Avian Assemblages in Bamboo and Non-Bamboo Habitats in a Tropical Rainforest

Avian Assemblages in Bamboo and Non-Bamboo Habitats in a Tropical Rainforest

CSIRO PUBLISHING Emu http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MU12017 Avian assemblages in bamboo and non-bamboo habitats in a tropical rainforest Débora Cristina Rother A, Kaizer José Ferreira Alves B and Marco Aurélio Pizo C,D AUNESP – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Departamento de Botânica, 13506-900 Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil. BInstituto Adolfo Lutz – Regional de Rio Claro, 13500-090 Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil. CUNESP – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Departamento de Zoologia, 13506-900 Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Some species of bird are closely associated with bamboos (bamboo specialists) but community-wide studies comparing the avian assemblages in bamboo and non-bamboo habitats are lacking. Using point counts, we compared the species richness, abundance and composition of the avian assemblages in bamboo and non-bamboo habitats in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Apart from considering bamboo specialists and non-specialist species, we contrasted birds from different categories of forest dependence, forest strata and diet. We recorded a total of 81 species of birds (74 in bamboo, 55 in non- bamboo habitats), including 15 bamboo specialists. Species richness was greater in bamboo habitats in all categories of diet and forest dependence. Bamboo and non-bamboo habitats had a similar number of canopy species, but bamboo habitats had a greater number of non-canopy species. The abundance of the whole avian community or of each of the dietary categories did not differ between habitats. The overall species composition differed between habitats, with a more homogeneous composition in non-bamboo habitats. A great number of species use bamboo habitats, even if they are not bamboo specialists. The initial expansion of bamboos, forming discrete patches of bamboo within mature forest, represents an intermediate-level disturbance that enhances forest heterogeneity and promotes the diversity of avian communities. Additional keywords: Atlantic forest, Brazil, diet, forest dependence, forest strata, intermediate-disturbance hypotheses. Received 28 February 2012, accepted 26 September 2012, published online 3 January 2013 Introduction region, Stotz et al.(1996) respectively listed 19 and 24 bird Bamboos form distinct microhabitats in forests around the world species typical of bamboo-dominated microhabitats, but other (Stotz et al. 1996; Judziewicz et al. 1999). The particular archi- species of these forests may also be considered bamboo specia- tecture and growth form of bamboos can profoundly change the lists (Bodrati et al. 2010; Santana and Anjos 2010). In the local vegetation structure, alter forest dynamics and regeneration Amazonian region, 18 of 474 bird species recorded in Alta and reduce the diversity of plant species (Oliveira-Filho et al. Floresta, Brazil, were confined to bamboo patches (Zimmer 1994; Guilherme et al. 2004; Fantini and Guries 2007). The et al. 1997), and at the Tambopata Reserve, Peru, 25 bird species massive seed production of bamboos and colonisation by veg- were confined to forest patches dominated by the giant bamboo etative reproduction are characteristics that allow bamboos to G. weberbaueri (Kratter 1997). In the Tambopata Reserve, become dominant in forests, forming distinct and sometimes bamboo-dependent birds were a significant part (6%) of the total extensive patches. In south-western Amazonia, for example, bird community (Kratter 1997). ~180 000 km2 of forest are dominated by the bamboos Guadua To date, studies of the relationship of birds with bamboos have weberbaueri and G. sarcocarpa (Nelson 1994; Griscom and focussed on subsets of the avian community, especially under- Ashton 2003). storey insectivores and granivores (Reid et al. 2004; Santana Despite their effect on forest structure and function, bamboos and Anjos 2010). Frugivores have been neglected despite their provide foraging opportunities for insectivorous and granivorous importance for the successful colonisation of bamboo patches by birds, some of which are closely associated with bamboos and are non-bamboo plant species (Rother et al. 2009). However, patches considered bamboo specialists. Insectivores may find a variety of dominated by bamboos may be unattractive to frugivorous birds prey items in suspended dead leaves, in cavities in bamboos and because bamboos do not produce fleshy fruits. along the culms and foliage of bamboos (Kratter 1997; Díaz et al. Possibly facilitated by anthropogenic disturbance (e.g. log- 2005). Granivores profit from the massive production of seeds ging, harvesting of palm (Euterpe edulis) hearts) and natural that characterise bamboo reproduction (Janzen 1976), typically disturbances (e.g. landslides, gaps resulting from tree falls), the tracking bamboo reproductive episodes (Areta et al. 2009). For native bamboo Guadua tagoara dominates large areas of the the lowland and montane Atlantic forests of the Neotropical Atlantic forest in south-eastern Brazil, with an estimated total area Journal compilation Ó BirdLife Australia 2013 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/emu B Emu D. C. Rother et al. of ~15 000 ha, and is considered a management problem inside habitats (40 plots in each) recorded average densities (Æs.d.) of forest reserves (Alves 2007; Lima et al. 2012). The growth of its 1007.5 Æ 541.8 trees ha–1 (139 species) in bamboo patches and rhizomes permits the formation of discrete patches (genets) 1278.8 Æ 541.8 trees ha–1 (153 species) in non-bamboo patches whose fusion may lead to the dominance of large expanses of (D.C. Rother, unpubl. data). The last reproductive episode of forest (Makita 1998). The dominance of G. tagoara exerts a G. tagoara in the study area was in 2004, and at the time of our strong influence on vegetation dynamics, damaging trees and study (2008–09), no seeds were present. The high density of saplings, changing the forest microclimate, promoting high rates bamboo culms in the understorey of bamboo patches makes it of litter deposition and a discontinuous canopy (Alves 2007; very hard to traverse such patches. Fantini and Guries 2007). However, there have been no studies examining the effect that the dominance of bamboos and the Census data consequent alteration of forest structure might have on faunal We collected data from the mosaic of bamboo and forest, assemblages. Such study is needed to determine if bamboo is a sampling both patches of bamboo and non-bamboo habitat. We problem within forest reserves. conducted 10-min point counts of all birds seen or heard within a In this study, we compare the species richness, abundance and 30-m radius; this radius allowed sampling within the limits of the composition of the avian assemblages in bamboo and non- smallest patches of bamboo. Five census points were placed at bamboo habitats of the Brazilian Atlantic forest. We seek to random in patches of bamboo and in non-bamboo habitat, with at determine if bamboo is a threat to avian communities or an least 100 m between neighbouring points. The five points in each important element that, by favouring the presence of bamboo habitat were sampled once each month from May 2008 to April specialists, enhances community diversity. Besides distinguish- 2009 (except October 2008 owing to weather conditions) be- ing bamboo specialists and non-specialists species, we compared tween 0600 and 0900 hours. Only diurnal birds were considered birds with different levels of forest dependence, and specialising in this study. All counts were done by one author (K. J. F. Alves). in different forest strata and dietary categories. Birds were classified according to diet, dependence on for- ested habitats and the forest strata most frequently used. Because Methods dietary studies were lacking for most species, we used only broad Study site categories of diet to reduce the probability of erroneous assign- ment of dietary class, based on published literature (Moojen et al. Field-work was conducted in the lowlands of the Parque Estadual 1941; Schubart et al. 1965) and personal observations of the Carlos Botelho (Carlos Botelho State Park; 24000–24150S, authors. Species were classed as frugivores, insectivores, nectar- 47450–48100W), in the state of São Paulo, south-eastern Brazil. ivores, or granivores; the latter were species for which seeds, The average annual temperature is 21.1C (range 17.4–25.2C), either from fleshy or dry fruits, formed an important part of the and average annual rainfall is ~2000 mm. Rainfall occurs diet. No carnivores were detected. Forest dependence was based throughout the year, but December–March are wetter and hotter mostly on Silva (1995), with a few modifications based on than the rest of the year (DAEE/SP 2009). The reserve contains personal observations of the authors. Categories of forest depen- >37 000 ha of well-preserved Atlantic rainforest (sensu Morellato dence were: (1) dependent, species found mainly in forest and Haddad 2000). Combined with other adjacent reserves, the habitats; (2) semi-dependent, species occurring in forest but also park forms a continuous block of 120 000 ha of forest, one of the often found in open habitats and (3) independent, species that do largest in the whole Atlantic forest. The study site comprises tall not need forest, and are often found in open vegetation such as (20–30 m) lowland old-growth forest with a wet and shady pastures and grasslands, although usually with scattered trees. understorey where palms (Euterpe edulis, Geonoma spp.) and Lastly, forest-dependent species only were classified based on

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us