WWW.LIVELAW.IN ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.3 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 154/2019 RAJEEV KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Respondent(s) Date : 24-05-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (VACATION BENCH) For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sunil Fernandes, AOR Mr. Suhaan Mukerji,Adv. Ms. Astha Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ravinder Singh,Adv. Ms. Nupur Kumar,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Manchanda,Adv. Ms. Kajal Dalal,Adv. Mr. Prastut Dalvi,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R A petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India cannot be said to be maintainable as the petitioner has also filed an application for extension of time before this Court. A bench of Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna, on 17.05.2019, has passed an order, which is at page Nos.155-162 of this petition. In view of the aforesaid, a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India should not have been filed. Be that as it may, since it is open to the petitioner to approach the concerned Court, as the Courts in the State of West Bengal are functioning, appear in person and seek the remedy before the concerned Court. 1 WWW.LIVELAW.IN With the liberty to seek remedy to approach the concerned Court in the State of West Bengal, this writ petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (NARENDRA PRASAD) (JAGDISH CHANDER) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2.