Disease of Aquatic Organisms 116:243

Disease of Aquatic Organisms 116:243

Vol. 116: 243–249, 2015 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published October 27 doi: 10.3354/dao02920 Dis Aquat Org FREEREE ACCESSCCESS NOTE Analysis of Yersinia ruckeri strains isolated from trout farms in northwest Germany Yidan Huang1, Arne Jung2, Werner-Johannes Schäfer3, Dieter Mock3, Geovana Brenner Michael4, Martin Runge5, Stefan Schwarz4, Dieter Steinhagen1,* 1Fish Disease Research Unit, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany 2Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany 3Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz Nordrhein-Westfalen (LANUV), Fisheries Ecology, Heinsberger Straße 53, 57399 Kirchhundem-Albaum, Germany 4Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI), Höltystr. 10, 31535 Neustadt-Mariensee, Germany 5Lower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety (LAVES), Food and Veterinary Institute Braunschweig/Hannover, Eintrachtweg 17, 30173 Hannover, Germany ABSTRACT: Enteric redmouth disease (ERM), caused by Yersinia ruckeri, is among the most important infectious diseases in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss aquaculture in Europe. Our aim was to analyse the persistence of Y. ruckeri strains in trout farms in northwest Germany and their dissemination between farms based on a detailed molecular and phenotypical characterisa- tion scheme. The data on identification and characterisation of Y. ruckeri strains and examining the distribution of these strains in the field could serve as a basis for preventive disease monitoring plans. During the observation period from June 2011 until June 2012, we collected 48 Y. ruckeri isolates from 12 different rainbow trout hatcheries. In total, 44 (91.7%) of the isolates were non- motile; in particular, all isolates recovered during the sampling period in winter and early spring were non-motile. In several trout farms, characteristic farm-specific Y. ruckeri isolates from partic- ular typing groups were isolated throughout the year, while in other farms, which had a trading relationship between each other, ERM outbreaks were caused by Y. ruckeri from the same typing group. Our data indicate that in some farms, the causative Y. ruckeri strains persisted in the respective trout farm. The presence of Y. ruckeri from the same typing group in farms with a trad- ing relationship indicates a dissemination of the infection between the farms. KEY WORDS: Epidemiology · Enteric redmouth disease · Rainbow trout · Oncorhynchus mykiss Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher INTRODUCTION Clinical outbreaks of ERM are characterised by haemorrhages in various tissues, particularly around Enteric redmouth disease (ERM) is a serious dis- the mouth, in the muscles, the peritoneum and the ease of farmed rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss lower intestine. Mortality in rainbow trout farms that causes economic losses worldwide. The aetio- where ERM is present can reach up to 70% of the logic agent of ERM, the enterobacterium Yersinia total population (Furones et al. 1993). ERM outbreaks ruckeri, has been isolated from various fish species, can be treated with antibiotics, but it is difficult to including rainbow trout, lake trout Salvelinus eradicate the disease from a farm completely. In the namaycush, brown trout Salmo trutta and Atlantic farm environment, Y. ruckeri can survive for several salmon Salmo salar, but mainly affects rainbow trout. months outside the host in water, sediment or bio- *Corresponding author: [email protected] © Inter-Research 2015 · www.int-res.com 244 Dis Aquat Org 116: 243–249, 2015 films of fish tanks (Furones et al. 1993, Coquet et al. sues of clinically diseased fish by the NRW fish health 2002). In addition, infected fish may become asymp- service. An additional 3 farms had no previous ERM tomatic carriers and shedders, and may thereby disease history. Vaccines raised against motile and infect other fish. This may happen on the same farm non-motile strains of Y. ruckeri were applied in 4 or on other farms when such infected fish have been farms with ERM outbreaks, while trout in all other moved between facilities. Hence Y. ruckeri can eas- farms were not vaccinated (see Table 1). In addition ily spread from one trout population to another and to ERM, infections with Flavobacterium psychro- from one farm to another. In order to prevent devas- philum (causing rainbow trout fry syndrome, RFTS) tating disease outbreaks and massive antibiotic treat- and Aeromonas salmonicida (causing furunculosis) ment, appropriate vaccination and good husbandry were also present in rainbow trout on some farms is essential (Villumsen et al. 2014). For vaccination, (Table 1). For treatment of clinical outbreaks of the ERM vaccines are mainly applied by the immersion bacterial infections, antimicrobial agents (sulphon- method, which allows vaccinating large numbers of amides/trimethoprim, amoxicillin or florfenicol) were juveniles in a fast and reliable manner (Chettri et al. applied in most farms, while trout in 1 farm were not 2012). Nevertheless, outbreaks of ERM are still peri- treated with antimicrobial agents at all (Table 1). odically observed, in particular in trout farms where Sampling was conducted during 6 campaigns from Y. ruckeri is endemic. These outbreaks have often June 2011 to June 2012. The water temperature var- been linked to the presence of non-motile isolates ied from 4°C in winter to 18°C in summer (Table 2). (assigned as biotype 2, BT 2, isolates). Non-motile BT In the farms, trout with clinical signs indicating a 2 isolates were found in trout populations in the UK, bacterial infection were selected from ponds with the European mainland (Austin et al. 2003, Fouz et clinical outbreaks of ERM, whereas trout from appar- al. 2006, Ström-Bestor et al. 2010) and North America ently healthy stocks were randomly sampled. An (Arias et al. 2007). The first isolation from a trout overview of the farm visits during the sampling cam- population in Germany dates back to 1994 (Klein et paigns, sampled tanks or ponds and the number of al. 1994). Recently, ‘vaccine-tolerant’ BT 2 isolates collected trout is given in Table S1 in the Supple- of Y. ruckeri were recorded from ERM outbreaks in ment, available at www. int-res. com/articles/ suppl/ trout farms in the German federal state of North d116p243_supp. pdf. Rhine-Westphalia (NRW; D. Mock pers. obs). In order to investigate the occurrence and further spreading of these ‘vaccine-tolerant’ isolates, Y. ruckeri strains Isolation of bacteria isolated from trout farms in NRW were analysed with the molecular and phenotypic characterisation Rainbow trout were transported to the laboratory scheme for Y. ruckeri developed by Huang et al. alive and examined for the presence of a Y. ruckeri (2013). infection following the diagnostic procedures of fin- fish and shellfish pathogens (American Fisheries Society Fish Health Section 2014). Kidney and spleen MATERIALS AND METHODS samples were collected from trout showing clinical signs and inoculated into tryptic soy agar. Y. ruckeri Sample collection were isolated and identified as described previously (Huang et al. 2013). Briefly, the isolates were exam- Rainbow trout were sampled from tanks or ponds ined by Gram staining and were biochemically char- of 12 different trout farms in NRW in 2011 to 2012 acterised by API 20E tests (bioMérieux). In addition, (Table 1). The farms were located at the headwaters repetitive sequence-based PCRs were performed, in - of the Lippe, Lenne, Ruhr and Agger Rivers, which cluding BOX-A1R-based repetitive extragenic palin- drain into the Rhine, and at the headwaters of the dromic-PCR (BOX-PCR), (GTG)5-PCR, enterobacter- Rur, which drains into the Maas (Fig. 1). All farms ial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) PCR and were monitored on a regular basis by the veterinari- repetitive extragenic palindromic (REP) PCR, as de - ans of the NRW fish health service. scribed by Amann (2007). Moreover, pulsed-field gel For stocking, all farms purchased eggs from sources electrophoresis (PFGE) of NotI-digested genomic certified as disease-free. In 9 of the examined farms, DNA of the Y. ruckeri isolates was performed as de- Yersinia ruckeri was endemic, and in 6 farms, the scribed previously (Huang et al. 2013). Subsequently, bacterium caused ERM outbreaks on a regular basis. the detailed molecular and phenotypical characteri- This was confirmed by isolation of Y. ruckeri from tis- sation scheme based on the API 20E profiles and the Huang et al.: Yersinia ruckeri strains from German trout farms 245 patterns received by PFGE macro - restriction analysis and the above mentioned repetitive sequence-based PCRs (Huang et al. 2013) was ap- plied to investigate the persistence of Y. ruckeri isolates in the farms and their dissemination between farms. RESULTS inarians of the North Rhine-West- Sample collection in NRW During the field study, 12 rainbow ; RTFS: rainbow trout; RTFS: fry syndrome (agent: trout hatcheries were visited in 6 sampling campaigns in different seasons between 2011 and 2012. In florfenicol total, 530 rainbow trout from 91 tanks, ponds or raceways were sam- Yersinia ruckeri) Yersinia amoxicillin, florfenicol amoxicillin, florfenicol amoxicillin, florfenicol pled. We were able to isolate Yer - sinia ruckeri from 183 trout collected from 39 tanks or ponds in 9 trout Aeromonas salmonicida) hatcheries, while Y. ruckeri could not be detected in trout from 3 hatch- eries (Tables

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us