Glucocorticoid Receptor and Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2 Cooperate to Regulate the Expression of C-JUN in a Neuronal Context

Glucocorticoid Receptor and Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2 Cooperate to Regulate the Expression of C-JUN in a Neuronal Context

J Mol Neurosci (2012) 48:209–218 DOI 10.1007/s12031-012-9809-2 Glucocorticoid Receptor and Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2 Cooperate to Regulate the Expression of c-JUN in a Neuronal Context Niels Speksnijder & Kenneth V. Christensen & Michael Didriksen & E. Ronald De Kloet & Nicole A. Datson Received: 17 April 2012 /Accepted: 7 May 2012 /Published online: 24 May 2012 # The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and myocyte c-JUN. In conclusion, for the first time, we show that enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) are transcription factors involved activated GR requires MEF2 to regulate c-JUN. At the in neuronal plasticity. c-JUN, a target gene of GR and same time, GR influences MEF2 activity and DNA binding. MEF2, plays a role in regulating both synaptic strength These results give novel insight into the molecular interplay of and synapse number. The aim of this study was to investi- GR and MEF2 in the control of genes important for neuronal gate the nature of this dual regulation of c-JUN by GR and plasticity. MEF2 in a neuronal context. First, we showed that GR mediates the dexamethasone-induced suppression of c- Keywords Glucocorticoid receptor . Myocyte enhancer JUN mRNA expression. Next, we observed that GR activa- factor 2 . c-JUN . Dexamethasone . PC-12 cells tion resulted in an increase in phosphorylation of MEF2, a post-translational modification known to change MEF2 Abbreviations from a transcriptional enhancer to a repressor. In addition, CDK5 Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 we observed an enhanced binding of MEF2 to genomic sites ChIP Chromatin immuno-precipitation directly upstream of the c-JUN gene upon GR activation. DEX Dexamethasone Finally, in primary hippocampal neuronal cultures, knock- GBS GR-binding site down of MEF2 not only reduced c-JUN expression levels GR Glucocorticoid receptor but abolished GR regulation of c-JUN expression. This GRE Glucocorticoid response element suggests that MEF2 is necessary for GR regulation of HPA-axis Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis IEG Immediate-early gene MBS MEF2 binding site Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12031-012-9809-2) contains supplementary material, MEF2 Myocyte enhancer factor 2 which is available to authorized users. PC-12 Pheochromocytoma cells N. Speksnijder : E. R. De Kloet : N. A. Datson (*) Division of Medical Pharmacology, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research (LACDR), Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Introduction e-mail: [email protected] : Neuronal plasticity, a change in the structure, function, and K. V. Christensen M. Didriksen organization of neurons in response to environmental stim- H. Lundbeck A/S R&D, 9 Ottiliavej, uli, underlies many key processes such as learning and DK-2500 Copenhagen-Valby, Denmark memory, adaptation, and behavioral sensitization. Changes in gene expression, governed by key transcription factors, N. A. Datson such as the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and myocyte en- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, hancer factor 2 (MEF2), underlie neuroplasticity. GR is Leiden, The Netherlands activated by glucocorticoid stress hormones, released by 210 J Mol Neurosci (2012) 48:209–218 the HPA-axis in response to stress. Upon activation, GR acts For GR blockade, cells were pretreated with VEH (0.1% as a ligand-activated transcription factor to influence expres- ethanol) or 1 mM RU486 (M8046, Sigma-Aldrich) for sion of a wide variety of genes, including genes involved in 60 min before addition of DEX or VEH. neuronal plasticity (Datson et al. 2008). MEF2 comprises a family of four members, MEF2a–d, showing distinct but Hippocampal Cultures partly overlapping expression patterns and is activated by neuronal activity. Upon activation, MEF2 regulates the ex- Newborn pups from NMRI mice were killed at postnatal pression of genes that control dendritic remodeling, result- day 1. Brains were isolated and kept in Hank’s balanced salt ing in the inhibition of synapse formation. Conversely, a solution on ice until dissection. Hippocampi were dissected decrease in MEF2 activity increases spine density (Flavell et in ice-cold dissection solution consisting of Krebs buffer al. 2006; Shalizi et al. 2006). supplemented with 3 mg/ml BSA, 1.2 mM MgSO4,and We previously showed that GR and MEF2 have several 2 mM HEPES. Hippocampi (n012) were transferred to a target genes in common, including the c-JUN gene (Datson conical tube containing 1.5 ml of dissection solution sup- et al. 2011a). c-JUN is a subunit of the transcription factor plemented with 184 μg/ml trypsin. The tissue was incubated AP-1 and is a ubiquitously expressed IEG with important at 37°C for 6 min. Subsequently, 3.5 ml of dissection solu- functions in cell death, differentiation, and inflammation tion supplemented with 0.65 mg/ml soyabean trypsin inhib- (Beck et al. 2009; Sun et al. 2005). The AP-1 family of itor; 10 μg/ml DNAse and 0.19 mM MgSO4 were added. transcription factors is recruited in the activation of neuronal The trypsinated and DNase-treated hippocampi were centri- circuits leading to long-term changes, such as long-term fuged at 100×g for 3 min. The supernatant was discarded, memory formation (Alberini 2009). MEF2 is known to and the conical part of the tube was filled with 1.5 ml of induce transcription of c-JUN (Kato et al. 1997; Aude- dissection solution supplemented with 5.2 mg/ml soyabean Garcia et al. 2010; Han and Prywes 1995), while GR trypsin inhibitor, 80 μg/ml DNAse, and 1.5 mM MgSO4. on the other hand is known to repress the expression of c-JUN The cells were dissociated by pipetting and left for 5 min at in vitro in AtT-20 cells and mouse fibroblast cells (Autelitano room temperature (RT), allowing remaining tissue to settle. 1994; Wei et al. 1998). The aim of this study was to The supernatant was transferred to a new tube containing investigate the molecular interplay of GR and MEF2 in a 3.5 ml of dissection solution supplemented with 132 μM neuronal context, using the shared target gene c-JUN as a CaCl2 and 120 μMMgSO4 and centrifuged for 10 min at proof-of-principle. 100×g. The cell pellet was resuspended in 3.5 ml of MEM II+ B27 (MEM buffer supplemented with 0.5% D-glucose, 0.22% bicarbonate, penicillin–streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamate, Materials and Methods 10% NU-serum, and 2% B27). After resuspension, the concentrated cell solution was diluted to 7.5 ml MEM II+ Cell Culture and Treatment B27. Cells were plated at a density of 50,000 live cells/well in poly-D-lysine coated 96-well dishes. The yield from one pup Rat pheochromocytoma (PC-12) cells (passage # 15–29) (two hippocampi) was approximately 400,000 living cells. were cultured as described earlier (Morsink et al. 2006b). The day after plating, media was changed to MEM II+B27 In short, cells were grown in DMEM medium, supple- buffer supplemented with 1 μM AraC (cytosine arabinoside). mented with 0–10% fetal bovine serum and 0–10% horse The cells were left for 14 days in vitro before assaying. serum, dependent on the stage of neuronal differentiation. For mRNA and protein analysis cells were seeded at a Lentiviral shRNA Transduction, Stimulation, and RNA confluency of 30–50% in pre-coated six-well plates Purification (356400, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). For ChIP experiments, the cells were seeded at 50% confluency in High titer batches (>5×10−8 TU/ml) of lentiviral particles pre-coated 175 cm2 plates (356478, BD Biosciences). Neu- harboring gene-specific short hairpin RNA (shRNA) target- ronal differentiation was achieved by giving 50 ng/ml ing MEF2A (Sigma, TRCN0000095959) as well lentiviral Nerve Growth Factor Beta (NGF-ß) (N2513, Sigma- particles harboring control shRNA (Sigma, SHC002V) were Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) every other day for 10 days. purchased from Sigma. The day after plating, hippocampal Medium at day 9 of the differentiation was supplemented with cultures were transduced with lentiviral particles at the charcoal-stripped serum to deprive the medium of endoge- following concentrations: 150,000 lentiviral particles/well, nous steroids (Sarabdjitsingh et al. 2010b). At day 10, the cells 75,000 lentiviral particles/well, and 37,500 lentiviral particles/ were treated for 30, 60, 90, or 180 min, dependent on the well. At day 14, the hippocampal cultures were stimulated for experiment, with either vehicle (VEH) (0.1% ethanol) or 90 min with 100 nM dexamethasone diluted in astrocyte- 100 nM dexamethasone (DEX) (D1756, Sigma-Aldrich). conditioned media. The latter was to avoid glutamate-induced J Mol Neurosci (2012) 48:209–218 211 excitotoxicity by the media change. Subsequently, cells 1% NaDOC), and 2× with TE buffer (1 mM EDTA pH 8.0; were processed for RNA isolation using the Aurum Total 10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0). Subsequently, the DNA com- RNA 96 Kit (BioRad). plexes were eluted from the beads with 0.1 M NaHCO3 and 1% SDS, and the DNA was reverse-crosslinked o/n at 4°C in Real-Time Quantitative PCR 0.2 M NaCl. The samples were then treated for 1 h with RNAse at 37°C and the DNA purified using Nucleospin Total RNA was isolated using Trizol (15596, Invitrogen) columns. The DNA was eluted in TE buffer for RT-qPCR according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNAwas diluted analysis. RT-qPCR on chromatin immunoprecipitation to 50 ng/μl, and cDNA was synthesized using the iScript (ChIP) material was performed directly on purified DNA. cDNA synthesis kit (170–8897, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, ChIP results were obtained by performing three individual USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us