Report 2013–5018

Report 2013–5018

Prepared in cooperation with the Oklahoma Water Resources Board Hydrologic Drought of Water Year 2011 Compared to Four Major Drought Periods of the 20th Century in Oklahoma Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5018 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: North Canadian River near Calumet, Oklahoma, during drought conditions in July 2011 (photograph by J.A. Savoia, U.S. Geological Survey). Hydrologic Drought of Water Year 2011 Compared to Four Major Drought Periods of the 20th Century in Oklahoma By Molly J. Shivers and William J. Andrews Prepared in cooperation with the Oklahoma Water Resources Board Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5018 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2013 This and other USGS information products are available at http://store.usgs.gov/ U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 To learn about the USGS and its information products visit http://www.usgs.gov/ 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Shivers, M.J., and Andrews, W.J., 2013, Hydrologic drought of water year 2011 compared to four major drought periods of the 20th century in Oklahoma: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013-5018, 52 p., http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2013/5018/. iii Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank several people for their contributions to the data collection and data analysis presented in this report. Darrell Townsend and Wynema Potter of the Grand River Dam Authority provided hydroelectric power generation data for Grand Lake, Lake Hudson, and the Salina project on Chimney Rock Lake. Ashley Corker of the Southwestern Power Administra- tion provided hydroelectric power generation data for Fort Gibson Lake, Keystone Lake, Lake Eufaula, Lake Tenkiller, and Broken Bow Lake. Jennifer Rogers of the Oklahoma Municipal Power Authority provided hydroelectric power generation data for Kaw Lake. Gary McManus of the Oklahoma Climatological Survey provided customized maps of percentage of normal precipi- tation and departure from normal precipitation for water year 2011. U.S. Geological Survey personnel Jon Scott, S.J. Smith, and Joy Savoia provided low-flow and lake-level photographs taken in the late summer of 2011. iv Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Selected Consequences of the 2011 Drought ..................................................................................2 Wildfires ........................................................................................................................................2 Required Water Conservation, Burn Bans, and States of Emergency ...............................2 Agriculture ....................................................................................................................................2 Tourism ..........................................................................................................................................3 Wildlife ...........................................................................................................................................3 Purpose and Scope ..............................................................................................................................3 Progression of Drought ........................................................................................................................3 Drought Sequence .......................................................................................................................3 Progression of Water Year 2011 Streamflow ..........................................................................3 Statewide Precipitation and Streamflow ..........................................................................................4 Precipitation by Climate Division ..............................................................................................................14 Climate Division 1 Panhandle ...........................................................................................................14 Climate Division 2 North Central ......................................................................................................16 Climate Division 3 Northeast .............................................................................................................16 Climate Division 4 West Central .......................................................................................................16 Climate Division 5 Central ..................................................................................................................16 Climate Division 6 East Central .........................................................................................................16 Climate Division 7 Southwest ...........................................................................................................16 Climate Division 8 South Central ......................................................................................................16 Climate Division 9 Southeast ............................................................................................................16 Streamflow of Long-Term Stations ...........................................................................................................16 Salt Fork Arkansas River at Tonkawa ..............................................................................................20 Chikaskia River near Blackwell ........................................................................................................20 Cimarron River near Waynoka ..........................................................................................................20 Cimarron River near Ripley ...............................................................................................................20 Illinois River near Tahlequah .............................................................................................................20 Canadian River at Calvin ....................................................................................................................26 North Canadian River near Wetumka ..............................................................................................26 Salt Fork Red River at Mangum ........................................................................................................26 Red River near Gainesville, Texas ....................................................................................................26 Washita River near Dickson ..............................................................................................................26 Blue River near Blue...........................................................................................................................26 Red River at Arthur City, Texas .........................................................................................................33 Effects of Low Streamflows .......................................................................................................................33 Conditions at Major Reservoirs ........................................................................................................33 Hydroelectric Power Generation .....................................................................................................33 Groundwater Levels at Selected Long-term Stations ...........................................................................33 Summary........................................................................................................................................................41 References ....................................................................................................................................................41 Appendixes 1–4. Photographs of Selected Sites at Normal/High-Flow Conditions and Drought/Low-Flow Conditions, 2007–12 ..............................................................................47 v Figures 1. Schematic diagram showing sequence of drought development .......................................4 2. Map showing monthly streamflow by percentile class, from U.S. Geological Survey WaterWatch, October 2010 through September 2011 ..........................6 3. Barchart showing annual departure from the statewide long-term median annual precipitation of 33.62 inches and a 5-year weighted average for Oklahoma, water years 1925–2011 .......................................................................8 4. Barchart showing annual departure from the statewide long-term median annual runoff of 2.74 inches and a 5-year weighted average for Oklahoma, water years 1925–2011. ..............................................................................................................11

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    63 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us