RESEARCH Structural Modeling of the Western Transverse Ranges

RESEARCH Structural Modeling of the Western Transverse Ranges

RESEARCH Structural modeling of the Western Transverse Ranges: An imbricated thrust ramp architecture Y. Levy 1,2 , T.K. Rockwell 1, J.H. Shaw 3, A. Plesch 3, N.W. Driscoll 2, and H. Perea 2,4 1DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY, 5500 CAMPANILE DRIVE, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92182, USA 2SCRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA–SAN DIEGO, 9500 GILMAN DRIVE, LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92037, USA 3DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCES, HARVARD UNIVERSITY, 20 OXFORD STREET, CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02138, USA 4INSTITUT DE CIENCIES DEL MAR, CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS, PASSEIG MARITIM DE LA BARCELONETA, 37-49, 08003 B ARCELONA, SPAIN ABSTRACT Active fold-and-thrust belts can potentially accommodate large-magnitude earthquakes, so understanding the structure in such regions has both societal and scientic importance. Recent studies have provided evidence for large earthquakes in the Western Transverse Ranges of California, USA. However, the diverse set of conicting structural models for this region highlights the lack of understanding of the subsurface geometry of faults. A more robust structural model is required to assess the seismic hazard of the Western Transverse Ranges. Toward this goal, we developed a forward structural model using Trishear in MOVE ® to match the rst-order structure of the Western Transverse Ranges, as inferred from surface geology, subsurface well control, and seismic stratigraphy. We incorporated the full range of geologic observations, including vertical motions from uplifted uvial and marine terraces, as constraints on our kinematic forward modeling. Using fault-related folding methods, we predicted the geometry and sense of slip of the major faults at depth, and we used these structures to model the evolution of the Western Transverse Ranges since the late Pliocene. The model predictions are in good agreement with the observed geology. Our results suggest that the Western Transverse Ranges comprises a southward-verging imbricate thrust system, with the dominant faults dipping as a ramp to the north and steepening as they shoal from ~16°–30° at depth to ~45°–60° near the surface. We estimate ~21 km of total shortening since the Pliocene in the eastern part of the region, and a decrease of total shortening west of Santa Barbara down to 7 km near Point Conception. The potential surface area of the inferred deep thrust ramp is up to 6000 km 2, which is of sufcient size to host the large earthquakes inferred from paleoseismic studies in this region. LITHOSPHERE; v. 11; no. 6; p. 868–883 | Published online 4 November 2019 https://doi.org/10.1130/L1124.1 INTRODUCTION transects across a fold scarp have revealed that comparable to the magnitude of uplift observed very large and rapid uplift events have occurred in the 1999 M 7.6 Chi-Chi earthquake in Taiwan Active fold-and-thrust belts produce destruc- along the Pitas Point/Ventura fault system (Fig. (Ma et al., 1999), and scaling relations (Wells tive earthquakes, such as the M 7.9 Wenchuan 1B, localities a and b; Hubbard et al., 2014), and Coppersmith, 1994) suggest that these are earthquake in 2008 and the M 7.3 Gorkha earth- the offshore part of which is referred to as the the result of large earthquakes. Considering the quake in 2015 (Hayes et al., 2016). Estimating Pitas Point fault and the onshore part of which complex structural geology in the upper several the geometry of faults at depth is important for is referred to as the Ventura fault. The observed kilometers of the Western Transverse Ranges, risk assessment because the deep connectivity uplift events were estimated to be the result of the observed uplifts were suggested to be the in thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belts determines Mw 7.5–8 earthquakes (Rockwell et al., 2016; result of multisegment thrust fault ruptures the plausible sizes of earthquakes that a sys- McAuliffe et al., 2015). For instance, Holo- (Hubbard et al., 2014). However, this explana- tem can host (Wells and Coppersmith, 1994). cene coastal marine terraces near Punta Gorda tion has been questioned based on arguments of Furthermore, many structural predictive mod- between Ventura and Santa Barbara, California, fault complexity (Sorlien and Nicholson, 2015). els have been developed because this class of record four uplift events in the past 6.7 k.y., with Various structural models (e.g., Yeats et structures acts as potential hydrocarbon traps an average of 10 m per uplift event (Rockwell al., 1988; Namson and Davis, 1988; Shaw and (e.g., Suppe, 1983; Suppe and Medwedeff, et al., 2016), Punta Gorda (Fig. 1B, locality a) Suppe, 1994; Hubbard et al., 2014; Sorlien and 1990; Erslev, 1991; Groshong, 1994; Poblet is situated on the axis of the Pitas Point/ Ventura Nicholson, 2015) have been advanced over the and McClay, 1996). The Western Transverse Avenue anticline along a section where the Pitas years to describe the complex fault architecture Ranges (Fig. 1) of southern California is an Point fault is mostly or completely blind, so in the Western Transverse Ranges. Nevertheless, active fold-and-thrust belt (Namson and Davis, much or all of the fault slip is translated into there are ongoing debates regarding these pro- 1988; Shaw and Suppe, 1994) in a highly popu- uplift through folding and back-thrusting. Simi- posed models, mainly centered on the direction lated region, with 18 million people inhabiting larly, the onshore Ventura fault has produced of dip of the primary structures and their senses the Los Angeles Basin along its southern margin. up to 6 m of vertical deformation per event of slip. As a result, series of competing, alterna- Recent studies of coastal uplift and borehole (McAuliffe et al., 2015). These uplift events are tive models for these structures are represented Geological© 2019 The SocietyAuthors. of Gold America Open |Access:LITHOSPHERE This paper| Volume is published 11 | underNumber the 6 terms| www.gsapubs.org of the CC-BY-NC license. 868 Downloaded from https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/lithosphere/article-pdf/11/6/868/4873307/868.pdf by CSIC-Centre Mediterrani D'Invet. Marines I Ambientals user LEVY ET AL. | Structural modeling of the Western Transverse Ranges RESEARCH A Jackson, 1981; Namson and Davis, 1988; Sarna- Nevada Wojcicki and Yerkes, 1982; Schlueter, 1976; Yeats, 1983). From these sources, we con - S a n California structed seven geologic cross sections of the A n upper few kilometers, with sections across the d re Relative displacement vector eastern Ventura Basin westward to near Point a s lt Conception (Fig. 2). We then applied forward N F au a k F u oc modeling using the Trishear module in Move® lt arl G Eastern (https://www.mve.com/) to replicate or match California the primary structural elements of the Western Pacific Ocean Shear Zone Transverse Ranges, as shown in the geologic Western Transverse Ranges cross section, with the intent of developing a crustal-scale model of the entire seismogenic Channel Islands Los Angeles portion of the crust. Incorporated into this mod- eling was information on the local and regional vertical motions, which aided in constraining the fault dip at depth. The nal result is a retro - deformable, area-balanced kinematic model that Relative displacement vector matches and accounts for the surcial and shal- low subsurface geology, the local and regional Mexico structural relief, and late Quaternary vertical 0 100200 300 km motions as determined from geologic studies of uplifted and deformed marine and uvial terrace sequences. We applied this model to Western S N an A B ndrea test the possibility that the Western Transverse .78 s Transverse $ Fault 34 Ranges hosts a fault system that may be capable d Ranges $ $ of generating earthquakes responsible for the Big Pine Fault + + large uplift events observed in the region. Pine + + Lit Mt. + t + le P Fau $ in lt Santa Ynez Fault e F .55 a $ u lt$ GEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND 34 San Cayet $ Blind ano Fault Ojai Valley S + a+ Point + n Ca + y + f F F etan o Conception c n Fa+ult The Western Transverse Ranges are Lio + Fau F + e h l + t + + i + Santa Barbara+ Arroyo Parida Fault+ l + + lm F F o F composed of continental plutonic and meta - P g+ r + it entura Av ed F MF e S ( s Point/V e + R North Channel a + nue An ault S + F ticlin Mounta in + + + + + e F .32 + + morphic basement in the east and juxtaposed Fault P a+ + ita + + + s + + + ( -P F o ( 34 ( int/Ve b or accreted oceanic ophiolitic–Franciscan ( ntura ystem S ( Fault( Ventura ( 0 5 10 20 Oak Ridge Fault ( basement complex in the west, both overlain km ( by an ~13-km-thick section of Cretaceous and 120 .32 119 .96 119 .59 119 .23 w Cenozoic sedimentary and volcanic deposits Figure 1. (A) Regional fault map of California. The relative motion of the Pacic and North American (Fig. 3; Dibblee, 1982a). In the Mesozoic and plates is right lateral and is on the order of 45 mm/yr. The Western Transverse Ranges, located within early Cenozoic, the Transverse Ranges block, or the black box located south of the Big Bend of the San Andreas fault, accommodate the shortening blocks, occupied the forearc region of a subduc- resulting from the geometry of the Big Bend of the San Andreas fault and the right-lateral strike- tion zone collecting continental shelf sediments slip faults southeast of the channel islands. (B) Main faults in the Western Transverse Ranges and location of geomorphic studies in the region: a (Punta Gorda)—uplifted and tilted marine terraces (Atwater, 1998). During the Oligocene, the (Rockwell et al., 2016), b—location of the sections from McAuliffe et al.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    16 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us