Cypress Species in Oregon

Cypress Species in Oregon

Cypress Species in Oregon Frank Callahan PO Box 5531, Central Point, OR 97502 lthough not widely known, four species of cypress are native in southwestern AOregon, a northern extension of the California Floristic Provence. These are Baker cypress (Hesperocyparis bakeri), Mendocino cypress (H. pygmaea), MacNab cypress (H. macnabiana), and Sargent cypress (H. sargentii). (New World cypresses, formerly Cupressus, are currently classified as Hesperocyparis; see sidebar.) I will tell the story of how and where they were discovered and named, what is known about their ecology and management, and speculate on the prospects for their survival. Baker Cypress1 In 1914 Forest Ranger William “Bill” C. Fruit discovered the first cypress found in Oregon on Steve Peak in the Siskiyou Mountains while clearing the route for a phone line to the lookout. Unfortunately, he did not document his discovery Bob Adams standing next to a Baker cypress trunk; note the characteristic flaking bark. Photo by Frank Callahan. with specimens (Matthews 1963). Three years later, on 24 August 1917, Forest Ranger Joseph two botanists from Southern Oregon College (SOC) who concluded L. Mackechnie and Matt W. Gorman, Superintendent of the that they were Baker cypress. This site is the northernmost cypress Forestry Building in Portland, collected voucher specimens from population in North America. Ted Maul, state forest patrol ranger, the site. Dr. Elmer Applegate also collected specimens there on Sam Taylor of Elk Lumber Company and Ed Marshal, US Forest 29 July 1930. Unfortunately, all of the foresters and Applegate Service, measured the Baker cypress at Flounce Rock in 1953; the misidentified these trees as MacNab cypress when in fact the trees were Baker cypress. I traced the misidentification to Forest Trees of the Pacific Slope (1908) by George B. Sudworth, US Forest Service dendrologist, where he described the northern extent of Macnab Cypress as “on the west end of the Siskiyous, at a point about 10 miles from the mouth of Seiad Creek.” Even though the discoveries in Oregon were all made after Jepson’s 1909 publication (see footnote), none of the foresters caught the error. Adding to the confusion, Jepson (1923) subsequently submerged Cupressus bakeri into C. macnabiana as var. bakeri. In 1965, James Griffin correctly annotated Mackechnie’s collections as C. bakeri. In 1926 Nelson Nye (1871-1946) found an “an old juniper patch” on Willits Ridge, north of Flounce Rock near Prospect in Jackson County, Oregon, about 70 miles northeast of Steve Peak. When Nye’s trees were shown to Dave Neville (1902-1985), he told 1 Milo Samuel Baker (1868-1961) discovered Baker cypress in 1898 on basaltic lava flows in the Timbered Crater Grove in southwestern Siskiyou County, Cali- fornia. Jepson (1909) named the species in Baker’s honor, using the following Wind-thrown Baker cypress at Willits Ridge; the trees were exposed to wind collection as a type specimen: California, Siskiyou Co., Near Dana, between damage when the area to the northeast was clearcut in 1986 in a timber sale called Hills Farm and Little Hot Springs Valley, Aug 1898, Baker s.n. (JEPS). the Cypress Garden. Photo courtesy of the Medford District BLM archives. 16 Kalmiopsis Volume 20, 2013 Flounce Rock. The trees were well spaced with trunks exceeding 2 feet in diameter at chest height.” Not long afterwards, Jim moved away, and I lost contact. I checked with the Prospect and Butte Falls Ranger Districts, but no one had ever heard of Iron Lake. An intensive search of the Sky Lakes Basin map produced over 100 unnamed lakes or small ponds, any of which could be Iron Lake. To date, these cypress have not been relocated. Mendocino Cypress2 Oregon’s second cypress might never have been discovered but for a series of serendipitous events. In the early 70’s, I had purchased property near Gold Hill about the same time as my new neighbors, Earl and Ruby Millhouse. Soon after Earl and I met, I learned that he was a certified millright and licensed electrician. In return for his assistance in preparing for a house on my property, I helped him landscape his property with junipers, pines and Arizona cypresses. These prompted Earl to tell about logging in the redwoods in 1947 and 1948 in the Brookings/Harbor area where he had encountered a stand of trees on the lower Winchuck River that really puzzled him. After felling several of the trees he examined the foliage and cones and concluded that they must be cypress. He took the samples to the foreman, who was unimpressed and remarked, “We will market the logs as Port Orford cedar as the price is right.” Earl kept quiet about it because “In those days, you Female cones of Baker cypress (Hesperocyparis bakeri) are covered with resin- did not argue the issue, I needed the job and could ill-afford to filled warty protuberances. Photo by Robert Korfhage. be fired or blacklisted.” But after work, he went about collecting cones, foliage and bark samples in order to get these trees identified; tallest trees were 75 feet tall and 22 inches in diameter (Anon. he also collected seeds for later planting. He put the dry foliage 1953). The trees varied from 30 to 40 years and older (Sam Taylor, samples in newsprint in a leather suitcase along with some bark pers. comm.). In a letter to Oliver Matthews, Warren R. Randall samples and about a pound and a half of seeds. He noted that the stated that there were “old cypress stumps throughout the stand that largest stumps were only about 300 to 500 years old and none of indicated that there had been cypress in the area for several hundred the trees showed any decline. They cleared the bottomland along years” (ltr. dated Sep. 23, 1953). the Winchuck, blasting, bulldozing and burning the stumps In 1948 Carl B. Wolf added subspecies matthewsii in C. bakeri because the landowner wanted to convert the area to pasture. At in honor of Oliver V. Matthews, who described morphological that point in our conversation, Earl opened his suitcase to display differences between populations of Baker cypress. (See more information on Matthews on pages 6-11) This subspecies is no longer recognized; C. bakeri is “treated as a monotypic species” (Afzal-Rafii 1994; Elbert L. Little and Jim Bartel, pers. comm.). In 1950 entomologist Dr. “Rosy” Robert George Rosensteil (1910-1995) visited the region west of O’Brien, Oregon, and collected about fifteen specimens of native plants including Baker cypress “8 miles west of O’Brien” (77599OSC). I verified the herbarium specimen at Oregon State University, annotated by Helen M. Gilkey. Although I have relocated all the other species he collected there, I have not found his cypress despite extensive searches of most of the roads and old trails. Much of this vast area of rocky, rugged ultramafic terrain burned in the 2002 Biscuit Fire. If the distance indicated on the label was air miles, the specimen was collected in Curry County, in the Baldface Creek drainage. In 1973 Jim Frazier and his wife reported discovering a small Female cones of Mendocino cypress (Hesperocyparis pygmaea) have an almost grove of Baker cypress in the Sky Lakes Wilderness, Klamath smooth surface and the scales bear a small broad prickle. Photo by Robert County, where an old wooden sign bolted to a tree read “Iron Korfhage. Lake.” Jim knew the species from Flounce Rock, but unfortunately, he did not collect specimens. He described the trees as “at about 2 Mendocino cypress was described as Cupressus pygmaea (Lemm.) Sargent 45 to 50 feet in height and branched with foliage nearly to the in 1901 in the Botanical Gazette 31:239: “Sparsely found on the ashen ‘white ground [without a] browse line like we observed at Willits Ridge, plains’ back from the coast near Mendocino” (1895) Lemmon and Wife [Plummer] s.n. (lectotype) designated by C.B. Wolf 1948. Kalmiopsis Volume 20, 2013 17 the specimens and asked “What cypress is this?” The samples certainly resembled the Mendocino cypress shown in Sudworth and McMinn (McMinn 1939) and I promised that I would collect Mendocino cypress specimens at Ft. Bragg for comparison, which I did in May 1975 and September 1976. The Winchuck and Ft. Bragg specimens were identical. MacNab Cypress3 During the 1970s I visited the UC Berkeley-Jepson Herbarium, where one of the curators brought me a specimen of Cupressus macnabiana from “Foothills west of O’Brien [homestead], Josephine County, Oregon, 1920.” The O’Brien homestead comprised about 80 acres located near the present town of O’Brien (Greg Walter, pers. comm., 2012). John Thomas Howell (1903-1994) annotated the specimen in 1926. There was a bold ink stamp on the sheet that read, EXTRALIMITAL, and the curator said to me, “You are Left to Right: Baker, MacNab, Mendocino, and Sargent cypress. from Oregon and what is your opinion of this, as we don’t think Photo by Cindy Roché and Robert Korfhage. it is valid.” I examined the specimen and verified that the species determination was certainly correct; however, the locality might be Foliage and Pollen Cones of Oregon Cypresses questionable because it is well out of the known range. On the other hand, the O’Brien area is characterized by ultramafic geology that is Cypress leaves are scale-like, toothed on margins, decussate a common habitat for the MacNab cypress. The curator told me that and closely appressed to the branch. The branching is the specimen was in transit (not part of the accessioned herbarium 4-angled, except MacNab cypress, which forms planar collection), so was slated for discard as they had no idea who the spraylets.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us