Morphological and Ecological Patterns of Extinction and Recovery in Veneroid Bivalves

Morphological and Ecological Patterns of Extinction and Recovery in Veneroid Bivalves

Paleobiology, 30(4), 2004, pp. 507±521 The K/T event and infaunality: morphological and ecological patterns of extinction and recovery in veneroid bivalves Rowan Lockwood Abstract.ÐAlthough the causes of mass extinctions have been studied in detail, recoveries have received little attention until recently. In this study, I examine the in¯uence of extinction versus recovery intervals on ecological patterns across the end-Cretaceous (K/T) event in veneroid bi- valves. Systematic and stratigraphic data were collected for 140 subgenera of veneroids, ranging from the Late Cretaceous through Oligocene of North America and Europe. Morphological data were collected for 1236 specimens representing 101 subgenera. Extinction selectivity and differ- ential recovery were assessed with respect to morphology, and by extension, burrowing ecology in these bivalves. Eighty-one percent of veneroid subgenera went extinct at the K/T and diversity did not return to preextinction levels until 12 million years later. Despite the severity of the K/T extinction, I found little evidence of morphological or ecological selectivity. The K/T recovery, in contrast, was strongly biased toward taxa with deep pallial sinuses (i.e., toward deeper burrowers). For veneroids, the morphological and ecological effects of the K/T event are not tied to the ex- tinction itself, but to the recovery that followed. The K/T recovery initiated a trend toward deeper burrowing that helped to establish veneroids as one of the most abundant and successful groups of modern marine bivalves. Rowan Lockwood. Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Present address: Department of Geology, The College of William and Mary, Post Of®ce Box 8795, Wil- liamsburg, Virginia 23187. E-mail: [email protected] Accepted: 6 April 2004 Introduction boundary, and in the same clade crossing dif- ferent extinction boundaries (see for example To understand the role that mass extinctions Copper 1994a,b; Arnold et al. 1995; Erwin play in shaping morphological and ecological 1996; see papers in Hart 1996; Retallack et al. patterns, it is important to examine both the 1996; Smith et al. 1999; Arens and Jahren extinctions themselves and the recovery inter- 2000). Although the need for a more compre- vals that follow. Similar to extinctions, recov- hensive understanding of recovery is recog- eries can in¯uence the ecology and evolution- nized, few studies have used the data available ary history of a biota. Although the causes and to address large-scale ecological or evolution- immediate consequences of mass extinctions ary questions. have been studied in detail, recoveries have re- The goal of this study is to examine eco- ceived little attention until recently (Erwin morphological patterns of extinction and re- 1996, 1998a,b, see papers in Erwin 1999, 2001; covery across the end-Cretaceous (K/T) event see papers in Hart 1996; Kirchner and Weil in veneroid bivalves. The majority of vene- 2000). roids are infaunal suspension-feeding bi- Recent studies of recovery in the fossil re- valves that are abundant and extremely suc- cord have involved the collection of high-res- cessful in modern shallow-marine environ- olution community composition data from the ments. Although they originated in the De- ®rst one to two million years after an event vonian, these bivalves were a minor (e.g., Harries 1993; see papers in Hart 1996; constituent of shelf habitats until the early Ce- HaÊkansson and Thomsen 1999; Heinberg nozoic, when they diversi®ed rapidly and ra- 1999; Twitchett 1999; Wood 2000). Available diated into deeper burrowing niches (Palmer data suggest that the amount of time required 1927; Cox et al. 1969; Harte 1998a,b, 1999). for diversity to return to pre-extinction levels This shift in ecological dominance and diver- (ranging from 250 Kyr to 20 Myr) differs in sity after the K/T mass extinction, in addition different clades crossing the same extinction to the fact that these bivalves are well pre- q 2004 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved. 0094-8373/04/3004-0002/$1.00 508 ROWAN LOCKWOOD served and abundant in a variety of paleoen- 1923, 1941, 1952, 1954, 1955; Marwick 1927; vironments, makes the veneroids an ideal Palmer 1927; Frizzell 1936; Tremlett 1953; clade in which to study the relative in¯uence Palmer and Brann 1965; Moore 1969; Dockery of extinction versus recovery intervals on eco- 1977, 1982; Vokes 1980; Sohl and Koch 1983, morphological patterns. 1984, 1987; Dhondt 1987; Saul and Popenoe The evolutionary impact of an extinction 1992; Saul 1993; Kirby and Saul 1995; Roop- event involves not only the number of taxa narine 1996; Harte 1998a,b; Roopnarine and lost, but also the elimination and subsequent Vermeij 2000, among others). A subgeneric exploration of areas of morpho- and ecospace. taxonomy is available online at http://dx. In this study, the consequences of the K/T doi.org/10.1666/02055.s1. event are examined, not only from the stand- Stratigraphic occurrences were compiled point of taxonomic diversity, but also with re- for 140 veneroid subgenera from museum col- spect to the morphology and ecology of ve- lections, ®eldwork, and the literature. First neroids. The close connection between shell and last appearance data (FAD and LAD, re- morphology and burrowing in these bivalves spectively) were established for each subge- makes this examination possible. Several au- nus on the basis of global occurrence data. thors (for example Stanley 1970, 1979; Kondo Stratigraphic range data for subgenera are 1987) have qualitatively or quantitatively de- available online in the Supplementary Online scribed the relationship between pallial sinus Material repository. The Late Cretaceous shape and burrowing depth in veneroids. As through Oligocene was divided into 28 inter- pallial sinus depth increases, burrowing vals, which range in duration from 2 to 4 Myr depth also increases. This ecomorphological and make it possible to compare diversity relationship will be used to document the im- across time intervals of roughly similar du- pact of the K/T extinction on the early Ceno- rations. These intervals were designed to co- zoic history of veneroid bivalves. incide with major chronostratigraphic and biostratigraphic boundaries, whenever possi- Methods ble. This study focuses on the late Mesozoic and Subgeneric diversity was calculated by tal- early Cenozoic evolutionary history of three lying taxa that cross boundaries (Foote 2000; closely related (Cox et al. 1969; Abbott 1974; see also Harper 1975; Bambach 1999). Esti- Harte 1998a,b; Slack-Smith 1998a,b; Abbott mated per-taxon rates of extinction (q) were and Dance 2000) superfamilies of heterodont calculated by using the number of taxa that bivalves: the Veneroidea, Arcticoidea, and range completely through an interval relative Glossoidea. For the sake of simplicity, these to the total number that range out of the in- superfamilies are collectively referred to here terval (see Foote 2000). as veneroids. Systematic data were collected Morphological data were collected from for 719 species and 140 subgenera of vene- 1236 museum and ®eld-collected specimens roids from the Late Cretaceous through Oli- representing 101 subgenera from the Late gocene of North America and Europe. Data Cretaceous through Oligocene of North collection was limited to extratropical regions America and Europe. Specimens were photo- to avoid the poor preservation and minimal graphed in standard orientation and shell sampling associated with tropical environ- shape was quanti®ed in two orientations, lat- ments during this time. Identi®cation of trop- eral and cross-sectional (Fig. 1), by using 100 ical regions was based on the geographic oc- equally spaced points distributed around each currences of large foraminifera in the Late outline. Pallial line shape was also quanti®ed Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene (Dilley by using 100 equally spaced points distribut- 1977; Hottinger 1977). ed around the pallial line, stretching from its Taxonomic identi®cations were based on intersection with the anterior adductor muscle personal observation and alpha-taxonomic in- scar to its intersection with the posterior ad- formation available in the literature (including ductor muscle scar. Images were recorded Dall 1902; Jukes-Browne 1908; Stephenson with a Sony Hi-8 video camera with a macro K/T AND INFAUNALITY IN VENEROID BIVALVES 509 original variation were retained and scores were interpreted by plotting sample outlines along each axis. The scores from these axes are referred to as PCA measures of morphology. A simple measure of pallial sinus perimeter was also derived by standardizing the pallial line data according to size and rotation and measuring distance (PD) around the pallial line. Taxa with larger pallial sinuses recorded higher values of PD. Multivariate analyses were performed with Statistica 5.0 and EFA (Rohlf and Ferson 1992) for Windows. EFA has been criticized recently on two counts (Haines and Crampton 2000): (1) that the method produces a relatively large num- ber of Fourier descriptors that are not com- putationally independent of each other and (2) that the method downweights all harmonics above the ®rst, effectively ignoring high-fre- quency information. Neither of these criti- cisms poses a substantial problem for the ap- plication of EFA in this study. The problem of redundancy is minimized by the use of PCA FIGURE 1. Morphological measures. One hundred to summarize shape change. Downweighting equally spaced points were

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    15 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us