Acetone in the Atmosphere:Distribution, Sources,And Sinks

Acetone in the Atmosphere:Distribution, Sources,And Sinks

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 99, NO. DI, PAGES 1805-1819, JANUARY 20, 1994 Acetone in the atmosphere:Distribution, sources,and sinks H. B. Singh,• D. O'Hara,2 D. Herlth,• W. Sachse,s D. R. Blake,4 J. D. Bradshaw,5 M. Kanakidou,• and P. J. Crutzen7 Acetone(CH3COCH 3) was foundto be the dominant nonmethaneorganic species present in the atmospheresampled primarily over easternCanada (0-6 kin, 35ø-65øN)during ABLE3B (July to August 1990).A concentrationrangeof 357to 2310ppt (=10 -12 v/v) with a meanvalue of 1140+ 413ppt was measured.Under extremelyclean conditions,generally involving Arctic flows, lowest (background) mixing ratios of 550 _+100 ppt were presentin much of the tropospherestudied. Correlationsbetween atmosphericmixing ratiosof acetoneand selectspecies such as C2H2, CO, C3H8, C2C14 and isoprene provided important clues to its possible sources and to the causes of its atmospheric variability. Biomassburning as a sourceof acetonehas been identified for the first time. By using atmospheric dataand three-dimensional photochemical models, a global acetone source of 40-60Tg (=1012 g)/yr is estimated to be present. Secondary formation from the atmospheric oxidation of precursor hydrocarbons(principally propane,isobutane, and isobutene)provides the single largest source (51%). The remainderis attributableto biomassburning (26%), direct biogenicemissions (21%), and primary anthropogenicemissions (3%). Atmosphericremoval of acetoneis estimatedto be due to photolysis (64%), reaction with OH radicals(24%), and deposition(12%). Model calculationsalso suggestthat acetonephotolysis contributed significantly to PAN formation(100-200 ppt) in .the middle and upper troposphereof the sampledregion and may be important globally. While the source-sink equation appearsto be roughly balanced,much more atmosphericand sourcedata, especially from the southern hemisphere,are neededto reliably quantify the atmosphericbudget of acetone. INTRODUCTION While several carbonyl species have been studied in polluted atmospheres[Vairavamurthy et al., 1992], formalde- Natural and anthropogenic nonmethane hydrocarbons hyde is the only one to receive significant attention in (NMHCs) are released into the atmosphereat a rate of nearly global tropospheric chemistry studies. One of the most 103Tg/yr [Duce et al., 1983;Singh and Zimmerman, 1992]. abundant reactive oxygenated species in the remote Atmosphericreactions of these NMHCs with ozone (03) and atmosphereis acetone.It was first measuredby Cavanagh et free radicals result in the formation of a variety of a l. [1969] at a concentration of about 1 ppb in the intermediate oxygenated species of which carbonyls uncontaminated Arctic air of Point Barrow, Alaska. Singh (RR'C=O) form an important group [National Academy of and Hanst [1981] used a photochemical model to suggest Sciences (NAS, 1976; Lloyd, 1979; Atkinson, 1990]. There that acetone is an ubiquitous atmospheric species resulting is further evidence that direct emissionsof carbonyl species from the oxidation of propane. They also showed that from both natural and manmade sourcesare also quite com- acetone can produce free radicals which sequester reactive mon [NAS, 1976; Isidorov et al., 1985; Sigsby et al., 1987]. nitrogen in the form of PAN. Recent photochemicalstudies Carbonyl compoundsare of interest to atmosphericchemists have used one-dimensional and two-dimensional models to because of their potential toxicity, their ability to photolyze describe its atmospheric structure based on its source and produce free radicals, their ability to form stable atmo- resulting from the oxidation of molecules such as propane spheric products, and their interactions in the smog cycles. and isobutane [Kasting and Singh, 1986; Chatfield et al., Because they are frequently intermediate products of atmo- 1987; Singh and Kasting, 1988; Henderson et al., 1989; spheric oxidation, these molecules can serve as excellent Kanakidou et al., 1991]. Data to support these model results tracers for the validation of photochemicalmodels. unfortunately are extremely sparse,in part becauseof lack of suitable measurement techniques [Vairavamurthy et al., 1992]. Table 1 summarizes available measurements of •NASA AmesResearch Center, Moffett Field, California. acetone,most of which were made at rural surfacesites using 2SanJose State University Foundation, Moffett Field, California. a variety of direct and indirect techniques. The only SNASALangley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia. measurementsthat are not made on the ground are those of 4Universityof California,Irvine. SGeorgiaInstitute of Technology,Atlanta. Arnold et al. [1986] who used an indirect chemical ionization SCentredes Faibles Radioactivit•s, Laboratoire mixte CNR$/CEA, Gif- technique, applicable in the upper troposphereand the lower sur-Yvette, France. stratosphere, to estimate acetone abundances. The wet ?MaxPlanck Institute for Chemistry,Mainz, Germany. chemical derivative techniques such as the DNPH/HPLC method have also been used for aldehydes and ketones in Copyfight1993 by the AmericanGeophysical Union. semipolluted environments, but these require long sampling Paper number 93JD00764. times and suffer from potential interferences[Vairavamurthy 0148-0227/93/93JD-00764505.00 et al., 1992]. Overall, few reliable measurements of acetone 1805 1806 SINGH ET AL.' ACETONE IN THE ATMOSPHERE TABLE 1. AcetoneConcentrations in the Rural/RemoteAtmospheres Acetone Mixing Ratio, ppb N Altitude Method Location Source 1.0 .(ND-2.9) 25 Surface 'grabsample ' PointBarrow' Alaska, Cavanaghet al. GC/FID 71 øN [19691 1-3 - surface grab sample westernUnited States Robinson et al. GC/FID [1973] 0,47+0.09 5 surface grab sample Atlantic air, Penkett GC/MS 35øN [1982] 2.8+0.8 18 surface condensate rural sites in Arizona Snider and Dawson GC/FID [1985] 0.1-0.2 19 upper troposphere, CIMS, over Europe, 45øN ArnoM et al. 6-10 km indirect method [1986] 1.7+0.8 96 surface DNPI-I/HPLC, rural sites in Shepsonet al. wet chemical southern Canada, 45øN [1991] 1.14_+0.41 , 123 free troposphere, cryosample North America, this study 0-6 km GC-RGD 35-65øN ND,not detectable; N, number of datapointsl CIMS, chemical ionizatioh mass spectrometery; DNPH, Dinitrophenyl hydrazine;HPLC, high performanceliquid chromatography;RGD, reductiongas detector. are available in the global troposphereand very little about key species with glass capillary column, and sensitivedetec- its sources and sinks is known. tion by a mercuric oxide reduction gas detector (RGD). The During the summer (July to August) of 1990, NASA RGD is based on the UV detection of mercury vapor released GTE/Arctic BoundaryLayer Expedition(ABLE)3B experiment when a speciesX reacts with heated (285øC) mercuric oxide provided an opportunity to utilize a recently developed (X+HgO(solid) --> XO+Hg(vapor)). It has been previously instrument to perform real-time airborne measurementsof shown by O'Hara and Singh [1988] that RGD can detect acetone between 35øN and 65øN to an altitude of 6 km. In acetone and acetaldehyde(and possibly formaldehyde) with a addition, a comprehensiveset of trace chemical (03, NOx, sensitivity that is 20 to 30 times greater than that of FID. NOy, PAN, HNO3, C2-C6 NMHC, CO, halocarbons)and Since the RGD is also sensitive to other species such as meteorological parameters were also measured. Here we alkenes, sulfur compounds, and some higher hydrocarbons, present the first airborne measurementsof acetone based on the analytical technique devised used a precolumn (with time- its direct real-time detection and use these to characterize its programmed backflush) to reduce potential chromatographic distributions and variabilities in the troposphere. interferences. Relationships between the atmospheric concentrations of Species of interest, such as acetone, were cryogenically acetone and other key chemical parameters are explored. (-170øC) enrichedfrom a 300 ml (0øC, 1 atm) air samplein a Based on the interpretation of these field measurementsand multistage open tube trap connectedto a ten-port gas sample the exercise of photochemicalmodels, we construct a rough valve. The concentrate was then injected into a precolumn picture of its sources and sinks. containing two stationary phases. The first section of the packed precolumn was 20 cm x 0.18 cm ID section of 10% EXPERIMENT carbowax 600 on Supelcoport connectedto a second section of 30-cm length containing 0.2% carbowax 1500 on ABLE3B utilized a Lockheed Electra for all aircraft Carbopack. The precolumnsand valve assemblywere held at measurements.Instrument integration and flight tests were 42øC. The compoundsflushed through the precolumn were performed at Wallops Island, Virginia. Aircraft missionswere cryofocusedin second dual stage trap attached to a six-port conducted from July 5 to August 15, 1990, primarily from valve. When acetone was collected in the secondtrap (time North Bay (46.3øN, 79.5øW) and Goose Bay (53.3øN, program), the two phase precolumn was backflushed to 60.4øW), Canada. Field missions were divided into generic substantially eliminate potential interferences such as water types that included boundary layer flux measurements, and high boiling organics. Trapped material from the second midtroposphericdistributions, and vertical profiles. A lati- precolumn was injected into the main analytical column by tude of 35ø-65øN over 60ø-80øW longitude was covered during heating it to 70øC. The main analytical column itself was a this experiment. Transit flights provided limited opportuni- 30 m x 0.75 mm 1/•m

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    15 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us