And Boreioglycaspis Melaleucae (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), Biological Control Agents of the Invasive Tree Melaleuca Quinquenervia Author(S): K

And Boreioglycaspis Melaleucae (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), Biological Control Agents of the Invasive Tree Melaleuca Quinquenervia Author(S): K

Geographic Distribution and Regional Impacts of Oxyops vitiosa (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Boreioglycaspis melaleucae (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), Biological Control Agents of the Invasive Tree Melaleuca quinquenervia Author(s): K. M. Balentine, P. D. Pratt, F. A. Dray, Jr., M. B. Rayamajhi, and T. D. Center Source: Environmental Entomology, 38(4):1145-1154. 2009. Published By: Entomological Society of America DOI: 10.1603/022.038.0422 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1603/022.038.0422 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is an electronic aggregator of bioscience research content, and the online home to over 160 journals and books published by not-for-profit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. BIOLOGICAL CONTROLÑWEEDS Geographic Distribution and Regional Impacts of Oxyops vitiosa (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Boreioglycaspis melaleucae (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), Biological Control Agents of the Invasive Tree Melaleuca quinquenervia 1 K. M. BALENTINE, P. D. PRATT, F. A. DRAY, JR., M. B. RAYAMAJHI, AND T. D. CENTER USDAÐARS, Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, 3225 College Ave., Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314 Environ. Entomol. 38(4): 1145Ð1154 (2009) ABSTRACT The invasive tree Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) Blake is widely distributed through- out peninsular Florida and poses a signiÞcant threat to species diversity in the wetland systems of the Everglades. Mitigation of this threat includes the areawide release campaign of the biological control agents Oxyops vitiosa Pascoe and Boreioglycaspis melaleucae Moore. We summarize the results of this release effort and quantify the resulting geographic distribution of the herbivores as well as their regional impact on the target weed. A combined total of 3.3 million individual Melaleuca biological control agents have been redistributed to 407 locations and among 15 Florida counties. Surveys of the invaded area indicate that the geographic distribution of O. vitiosa encompasses 71% of the Melaleuca infestation. Although released 5 yr later, the distribution of B. melaleuca is slightly greater than its predecessor, with a range including 78% of the sampled Melaleuca stands. Melaleuca stands outside both biological control agentsÕ distributions occurred primarily in the northern extremes of the treeÕs range. Strong positive association between herbivore species was observed, with the same density of both species occurring in 162 stands and no evidence of interspeciÞc competition. Soil type also inßuenced the incidence of biological control agents and the distribution of their impacts. The odds of encoun- tering O. vitiosa or B. melaleucae in cells dominated by sandy soils were 2.2 and 2.9 times more likely than those predominated by organically rich soils. As a result, a greater level of damage from both herbivores was observed for stands growing on sandy versus organic-rich soils. KEY WORDS herbivory, invasive species, dispersal, weed biological control, postrelease evaluation Invasion of natural communities by exotic species is a Regional efÞcacy of biological control is dependent, severe threat to ecosystem integrity (Heywood 1989, in part, on the natural enemyÕs geographic distribu- OTA 1993, Wilcove et al. 1998, Myers and Bazely tion, its population densities, and the suppressive ef- 2003). Invasive alien plants, for instance, threaten na- fect per individual (Parker et al. 1999). In early stages tive ecosystems by altering hydrological patterns, dis- of a weed biological control program, the herbivoreÕs turbance regimens, nutrient cycling, energy budgets, geographic distribution is generally limited to initial and species diversity (Vitousek et al. 1997, Mack et al. release localities. However, as host plants deteriorate 2000). Tactics for mitigating the spread and negative or individuals enter a dispersive phase, herbivores effects of widely established exotic plants have in- seek new host patches and the distribution of the cluded mechanical, chemical, and, in some cases, bi- nascent population increases across the infested re- ological control approaches. However, landscape- gion. The inherent dispersal characteristics of natural level control efforts are often limited by the complex enemies are cited as a unique advantage of biological matrix of property owners, each with differing prior- control. Even in programs with rapidly dispersing ities and economic resources for the management of agents, however, redistribution efforts are often im- invasive plants. In such cases, biological control often plemented to expedite herbivore spread and impacts. represents the only invasive plant management ap- In 1988, a large-scale redistribution effort within the proach that can be uniformly implemented over a United States was initiated to disseminate nine Eur- large geographic area. asian insect species throughout the range of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.), resulting in releases of Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication these biological control agents in 188 counties across is solely for the purpose of providing speciÞc information and does not 19 states (Hansen et al. 1997). Through a similar effort, imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. introduced herbivores of purple loosestrife (Lythrum 1 Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]. salicaria L.) have been established in 33 states within 1146 ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 38, no. 4 the Unites States and Ͼ1500 wetlands across North A classical weed biological control program target- America (Blossey et al. 2001, Piper et al. 2004). In a ing Melaleuca was initiated in 1986, with expectations successful effort to reverse the socio-economic im- that introduced herbivores would limit invasion and pacts of water hyacinth invasion on shoreline com- compliment conventional control tactics (Balciunas et munities along the banks of Lake Victoria in eastern al. 1994). The curculionid O. vitiosa was the Þrst can- Africa, several million Neochetina bruchi Hustache and didate selected for quarantine-based host speciÞcity N. eichhorniae Warner weevils were released in col- testing (Purcell and Balciunas 1994) and, once laboration with the local Þshermen of Kenya, Tanza- deemed environmentally safe, was released in Florida nia, and Uganda (Cilliers et al. 2003). in 1997 (Center et al. 2000, Pratt et al. 2003). Eggs are Selection of release points for redistribution pro- deposited on the surface of expanding foliar buds, grams have been largely based on cooperator avail- young leaves, or elongating stems. Larvae are ectoph- ability, local site characteristics, and political pressures ages, feeding on one side of the leaf through to the (Hansen et al. 1997, Wright 1997). Only recently have cuticle on the opposite, producing a window-like feed- predictive models that incorporate weed distribution, ing scar. After the completion of Þve instars, larvae agent release points, and herbivore dispersal been drop to the forest ßoor and pupate in the soil. In the used to provide insight to optimal release strategies absence of suitable phenological stages of its host, (Nordblom et al. 2002). A simulation model developed larvae are uncommon during summer months (April by Pratt et al. (2003), for instance, predicted that to September) unless damage-induced regrowth is dispersal of the biological control agent Oxyops vitiosa present (Center et al. 2000). Adult weevils can live in Pascoe through the range of its host Melaleuca quin- excess of 1 yr, and females produce Ϸ350 eggs during quenervia (Cav.) Blake (hereafter referred to by the their lifetime (Wheeler 2003). Feeding by the weevil genus) in Florida would require Ϸ15 yr. However, the markedly reduces the treeÕs reproductive potential model indicated that weevil dispersal to remote (Pratt et al. 2005), but O. vitiosa pupates in the soil so Melaleuca stands was slow and in a few cases nonex- it is unable to thrive in permanently ßooded habitats istent. Therefore, an iterative process was used to where some Melaleuca stands persist. identify additional release locations, which resulted in To enhance landscape-level suppression of Melaleuca, the recommendation to release 5,000 weevils at each a second biological control agent, the psyllid B. of 16 additional releases points. This redistribution was melaleucae, was released in Florida during the spring predicted to expedite the weevilÕs spread throughout of 2002 (Center et al. 2006). By completing its life the treeÕs adventive range. In response to these results, cycle entirely on the plant, B. melaleucae is less vul- federal, state, and county agencies initiated a redis- nerable to hydrological conditions and it exploits a tribution campaign for O. vitiosa and incorporated wider range of leaf ages than the weevil (Wineriter et releases of the second Melaleuca biological control al. 2003). Like all psyllids, B. melaleucae passes

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us