Annexe n°4 : Les déports de juges de la CEDH entre 2009 et 2019 Par Delphine Loiseau, janvier 2020. Figure ci-dessous la liste des affaires ayant donné lieu au déport d’un juge. Les cas d’empêchements ne sont pas mentionnés. Cette liste a été réalisée par une recherche sur HUDOC avec les termes : « déport », “withdrew from sitting in the case”, et “Rule 28”. Les affaires sont classées par ordre chronologique. Les affaires surlignées en vert sont à distinguer des déports en tant que tels, il s’agit d’affaires où il y a eu une demande de déport formulée par l’une des parties. • AFFAIRE IRIBARREN PINILLOS c. ESPAGNE 36777/03 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Third Section) | 08/01/2009 6. A la suite du déport de M. L. López Guerra, juge élu au titre de l’Espagne (article 28 du règlement). Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant. • CASE OF MANGOURAS v. SPAIN 12050/04 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Third Section) | 08/01/2009 THIS CASE WAS REFERRED TO THE GRAND CHAMBER WHICH DELIVERED JUDGMENT IN THE CASE ON 28/09/2010 6. Mr L. López Guerra, the judge elected in respect of Spain, withdrew from sitting in the case. The Government accordingly appointed Mr A. Saiz Arnaiz to sit as an ad hoc judge (Article 27 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 29 § 1). Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant • AFFAIRE VALKOV c. BULGARIE 72636/01 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Fifth Section) | 08/01/2009 5. La juge Kalaydjieva, juge élue au titre de la Bulgarie, s’étant déportée (article 28 du règlement de la Cour), le 1er octobre 2008 le Gouvernement a désigné une autre juge élue, la juge Lazarova Trajkovska, pour siéger à sa place (article 29 § 1 a) du règlement). Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant. • CASE OF KOPRINAROVI v. BULGARIA ECLJ, Annexe n°4 : Les déports de juges de la CEDH entre 2009 et 2019 1 57176/00 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Fifth Section) | 15/01/2009 5. Judge Kalaydjieva, the judge elected in respect of Bulgaria, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28 of the Rules of Court). On 1 October 2008, the Government, pursuant to Rule 29 § 1 (a), informed the Court that they had appointed in her stead another elected judge, namely Judge Lazarova Trajkovska. Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant. • CASE OF CEBOTARI AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA 37763/04 34350/04 35178/04... | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Fourth Section) | 27/01/2009 6. Judge Poalelungi, the judge elected in respect of Moldova, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28 of the Rules of Court). On 29 October 2008, the Government, pursuant to Rule 29 § 1 (a), informed the Court that they were content to appoint in his stead another elected judge and left the choice of appointee to the President of the Chamber. On 1 December 2008, the President appointed Judge Šikuta to sit in the case. Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant. • CASE OF SIMOVA AND GEORGIEV v. BULGARIA 55722/00 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Fifth Section) | 12/02/2009 5. Judge Kalaydjieva, the judge elected in respect of Bulgaria, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28 of the Rules of Court). On 1 October 2008, the Government, pursuant to Rule 29 § 1 (a), informed the Court that they had appointed in her stead another elected judge, namely Judge Lazarova Trajkovska. Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant. • CASE OF DIMITAR AND ANKA DIMITROVI v. BULGARIA 56753/00 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Fifth Section) | 12/02/2009 Judge Kalaydjieva, the judge elected in respect of Bulgaria, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28 of the Rules of Court). On 1 October 2008, the Government, pursuant to Rule 29 § 1 (a), informed the Court that they had appointed in her stead another elected judge, namely Judge Lazarova Trajkovska. Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant. • CASE OF MIHAYLOVI v. BULGARIA 6189/03 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Fifth Section) | 12/02/2009 5. Judge Kalaydjieva, the judge elected in respect of Bulgaria, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28 of the Rules of Court). On 1 October 2008, the Government, pursuant to Rule 29 § 1 (a), informed the Court that they had appointed in her stead another elected judge, namely Judge Lazarova Trajkovska. Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant. ECLJ, Annexe n°4 : Les déports de juges de la CEDH entre 2009 et 2019 2 • CASE OF MITEVA v. BULGARIA 60805/00 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Fifth Section) | 12/02/2009 5. Judge Kalaydjieva, the judge elected in respect of Bulgaria, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28 of the Rules of Court). On 1 October 2008, the Government, pursuant to Rule 29 § 1 (a), informed the Court that they had appointed in her stead another elected judge, namely Judge Lazarova Trajkovska. Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant. • CASE OF VLADIMIROVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 42617/02 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Fifth Section) | 26/02/2009 4. Judge Kalaydjieva, the judge elected in respect of Bulgaria, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28 of the Rules of Court). On 1 October 2008, the Government, pursuant to Rule 29 § 1 (a), informed the Court that they had appointed in her stead another elected judge, namely Judge Lazarova Trajkovska. Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant. • CASE OF DUCA v. MOLDOVA 75/07 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Fourth Section) | 03/03/2009 5. Judge Poalelungi, the judge elected in respect of Moldova, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28 of the Rules of Court) after it had been notified to the Government. On 31 January 2009, the Government, pursuant to Rule 29 § 1 (a), informed the Court that they were content to appoint in his stead another elected judge and left the choice of appointee to the President of the Chamber. On 1 February 2009, the President appointed Judge Šikuta to sit in the case. Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant • CASE OF DEIWICK v. GERMANY 7369/04 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Fifth Section) | 26/03/2009 4. Judge Jaeger, the judge elected in respect of Germany, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28 of the Rules of Court). On 20 June 2008, the Government, pursuant to Rule 29 § 1 (a), informed the Court that they had appointed in her stead another elected judge, namely Judge Mark Villiger. Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant • CASE OF RASMUSSEN v. POLAND 38886/05 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Fourth Section) | 28/04/2009 5. Mr L. Garlicki, the judge elected in respect of Poland, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28 of the Rules of Court). The Government accordingly appointed Mr R. Wieruszewski to sit as an ad hoc judge (Rule 29). ECLJ, Annexe n°4 : Les déports de juges de la CEDH entre 2009 et 2019 3 Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant, mais l’avocat (M. Pietrzak) fait partie des avocats pro bono de la Fondation Helsinki des droits de l’homme de Pologne (cf. rapport de la HFHR). • AFFAIRE BENDAYAN AZCANTOT ET BENALAL BENDAYAN c. ESPAGNE 28142/04 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Third Section) | 09/06/2009 5. A la suite du déport de M. L. López Guerra, juge élu au titre de l’Espagne (article 28 du règlement), le Gouvernement a désigné M. A. Saiz Arnaiz comme juge ad hoc pour siéger à sa place (articles 27 § 2 de la Convention et 29 § 1 du règlement). Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant. • AFFAIRE MORENO CARMONA c. ESPAGNE 26178/04 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Third Section) | 09/06/2009 5. A la suite du déport de M. L. López Guerra, juge élu au titre de l’Espagne (article 28 du règlement), le Gouvernement a désigné M. A. Saiz Arnaiz comme juge ad hoc pour siéger à sa place (articles 27 § 2 de la Convention et 29 § 1 du règlement). Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant. • AFFAIRE MIANOWICZ c. ALLEMAGNE (N° 2) 71972/01 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Fifth Section) | 11/06/2009 4. A la suite du déport de Mme R. Jaeger, juge élue au titre de l'Allemagne (article 28), le Gouvernement a désigné M. M. Villiger, juge élu au titre du Liechtenstein pour siéger à sa place (articles 27 § 2 de la Convention et 29 § 1 du règlement). Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant. • CASE OF EVELYNE DEIWICK v. GERMANY 17878/04 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Fifth Section) | 11/06/2009 On 7 February 2008, on account of the fact that Judge Renate Jaeger, the judge elected in respect of Germany, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28 of the Rules of Court), the respondent Government, pursuant to Rule 29 § 1 (a), informed the Court that they had appointed in her stead another elected judge, namely Judge Mark Villiger. Pas d’ONG en tierce intervention et comme représentant du requérant. • CASE OF GYULEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 76963/01 | Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) | Court (Fifth Section) | 25/06/2009 5.