On the Middle Atlantic Bight Outer Continental Shelf

On the Middle Atlantic Bight Outer Continental Shelf

W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles Virginia Institute of Marine Science 1982 Spatial and Temporal Resource Use by Dominant Benthic Amphipoda (Ampeliscidae and Corophiidae) on the Middle Atlantic Bight Outer Continental Shelf LC Schaffner Virginia Institute of Marine Science DF Boesch Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Schaffner, LC and Boesch, DF, Spatial and Temporal Resource Use by Dominant Benthic Amphipoda (Ampeliscidae and Corophiidae) on the Middle Atlantic Bight Outer Continental Shelf (1982). MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 9, 231-243. 10.3354/meps009231 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MARINE ECOLOGY - PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 9: 231-243, 1982 Published September 15 1 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. I Spatial and Temporal Resource Use by Dominant Benthic Amphipoda (Ampeliscidae and Corophiidae) on the Middle Atlantic Bight Outer Continental Shelf *** Linda C. Schaffner and Donald F. Boesch8** Virginia Institute of Marine Science and School of Marine Science, The College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point. Virginia 23062, USA ABSTRACT: The study was designed to investigate ecological relationships among numerically dominant species of amphipods in the families Ampeliscidae and Corophiidae on the outer continental shelf of the Middle Atlantic Bight. USA. It assesses the importance of biot~cinteractions by examining spatial and temporal patterns in abundance and distribution. A complex set of physical and biological factors govern distribution and abundance of these species within the outer shelf zone. In outer shelf swale (topographic depression) habitats the ampeliscid Ampelisca agassizi effectively excludes other members of the family. This may be the result of the species' superior ability to utilize spatial resources. Outside of swale habitats the abundances of the ampelisclds Ampelisca vadorum and Byblis serrata may be limited by the availability of trophic resources. The corophiids exhibited little evidence of resource partitioning. Some differences in microhabitat distribution may facilitate coexistence of the species in this family, as well as between families. The corophiids Unciola irrorata and Erichthonius rubricornis are known to comprise a major portion of the diet of benthic fishes on the outer shelf. It is suggested that populations of these species may be held below the levels at which biotic interactions become important by both benthic predators and physical disturbance. INTRODUCTION dators in hard-substrate systems has also been documented (Menge, 1972; Menge and Menge, 1974). Identifying the factors responsible for species coex- In many of these studies, and numerous others (e.g. istence in communities is a major focus of ecology. In Paine, 1966, 1969, 1974; Dayton, 1971; Menge and the marine environment the structuring roles of both Sutherland, 1976; Lubchenco and Menge, 1978) preda- competitive interactions and predation have been tion has been shown to mediate competitive interac- documented for hard- and soft-substrate benthic com- tions by maintaining low densities of species poten- munities. A number of studies have shown that com- tially limited by the same resources. petition for space in the rocky intertidal zone can lead It has been more difficult to identify clearly the to spatial monopoly by the competitively superior factors which facilitate species coexistence and main- species (Connell, 1961; Stimson, 1970; Dayton, 1971). tain organization in soft-substrate benthic com- Competition for trophic resources among motile pre- munities. The observed partitioning of potentially limiting resources among species in many of these A portion of a thesis (LCS) submitted in partial fulfillment communities supports the contention that a cornpeti- of the Masters degree, School of Marine Science, College of tive structuring mechanism is involved (Schoener, William and Mary, Gloucester Point, Virginia, USA 1974; Woodin, 1974; Ivester, 1980; Whitlatch, 1980). Contribution No. 1063 from the Virginia Institute of Additionally, predation has been increasingly iden- Marine Science .. ' Present address: Louisiana Universities Marine Consor- tified as an important mechanism structuring com- tium, Marine Research and Education Center, Cocodrie. munities, particularly in shallow subtidal and interti- Louisiana, USA dal habitats (Peterson, 1979). O Inter-Research/Printed in F. R. Germany 232 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser 9: 231-243, 1982 Amphipods in the families Ampeliscidae and 1977), while Station B5 was sampled quarterly for 1 yr Corophiidae comprise a major portion of the (November 1976 through August 1977). Additionally. Peracarida, the numerically dominant crustacean 48 samples were collected in the study area based on a taxon on the Middle Atlantic outer continental shelf stratified random sampling scheme during November (Boesch, 1979a).They also are among the most impor- 1976. The area was first divided into 6 habitat strata tant prey items for juvenile bottom feeding fishes based on a priori data concerning sediment grain size (Edwards, 1976; Boesch, in press). Understanding the as well as detailed bathymetric charts developed by mechanisms facilitating coexistence among these the U.S. Geological Survey (Knebel and Spiker, 1977). tubicolous, surface feeding amphipods would increase Sampling positions within each stratum (Fig. I) were our knowledge of the fundamental processes structur- then determined by random selection of two Loran C ing soft-substrate communities. This study was coordinates. SIXreplicate 0.1 m2 Smith-McIntyre grab designed to investigate the ecological relationships samples were collected during each season at Stations among these species, and to assess the importance of B1 to B5; 1 sample was collected at each of the biotic interactions, by examining spatial and temporal stratified random stations. Following the removal of patterns in abundance and distribution. An examina- small cores for sediment and organic carbon analyses, tion of feeding habits and functional morphologies of samples were sieved through 0.5 mm mesh screen, the species considered herein will be treated sepa- narcotized in MgC1, and preserved in 10 % buffered rately (Schaffner, in prep.). formalin. Sediment grain size distribution was determined by wet-sieving to separate silt-clay and gravel fractions STUDY AREA followed by measuring of sand size distribution by rapid sediment analyzer. Total organic carbon content The study area is a region of the Middle Atlantic of surface sediment was measured by infrared analyzer Bight outer continental shelf (depth 50 to 100 m) off (Oceanography International Carbon Analyzer) fol- New Jersey, designated Area B in a larger study by lowing heated (125 'C) oxidation by phosphoric acid. Boesch (1979a) (Fig. 1). The study site and most of the The amphipods utilized in this study - including the Middle Atlantic continental shelf is topographically ampeliscids Arnpelisca agassizi, A. vadorum, Byblis complex as a result of both historic and contemporary serrata, and corophiids Unciola irrorata, U. inermisand geological processes. Tiger Scarp (Fig. 1) is a promi- Erichthonius rubricornis - were sorted from samples, nent feature of the eastern portion of Area B and is enumerated and stored in 70 % ethanol. thought to be an erosional feature marking shoreline Multivariate analyses were employed after prelimi- position during a major sea level stillstand during nary examination indicated that amphipod distribution Holocene transgression (Milliman, 1973). Below the patterns within the study were not obviously related to scarp a series of linear sand ridges trending roughly any single environmental parameter. Numerical clas- northeast to southwest further increases the topo- sification was used to group collections from 47 graphic complexity. These major ridges on the outer stratified random stations and the November 1976 New Jersey shelf have an average spacing of 6.1 km quarterly collections (mean abundances) on the basis and a relief of 6.0 m from crest to swale (Duane et al., of abundance of the 6 species in those samples. The 1972; Swift et al., 1972). It is thought that these linear collection from Station D8 contained none of the ridges were generated at the shoreface and later species and was, therefore, not included in the analy- stranded by transgressing seas (Swift et al., 1972; sis. In actuality, 7 taxa were considered in the classifi- Swift, 1975). Contemporary hydrodynamic processes cation since juvenile Unciola (individuals 5 3 mm may be responsible for their further modification and could not be identified to species) were considered maintenance (Duane et al., 1972; Swift et al., 1972; separately. Stubblefield et al., 1975; Stubblefield and Swift, 1976). Log-transformed (loglox+l) species counts (adjusted to comparable surface areas) were used to calculate Bray-Curtis similarity measures for each pair of sta- METHODS tions. Both group-average and flexible sorting strategies were used to cluster the stations (Clifford Stations representative of 5 different sedimentary and Stephenson, 1975; Boesch, 1977). The cluster habitats relate$ to shelf topography were sampled intensity coefficient in the flexible sorting

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us