Therapeutic Alternatives for Drug-Resistant Cabapenemase- Producing Enterobacteria

Therapeutic Alternatives for Drug-Resistant Cabapenemase- Producing Enterobacteria

THERAPEUTIC ALTERNATIVES FOR MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT AND EXTREMELY All isolates resistant to carbapenems were evaluated Fig. 1: Susceptibility (%) of Carbapenemase-producing MDRE Fig. 3: Susceptibility (%) of VIM-producing MDRE to Alternative DRUG-RESISTANT CABAPENEMASE- for the presence of genes encoding carbapenemases to Alternative Antibiotics Antibiotics PRODUCING ENTEROBACTERIA OXA-48-like, KPC, GES, NDM, VIM, IMP and GIM. M. Almagro*, A. Kramer, B. Gross, S. Suerbaum, S. Schubert. Max Von Pettenkofer Institut, Faculty of Medicine. LMU Munich, München, Germany. RESULTS BACKROUND 44 isolates of CPE were collected: OXA-48 (n=29), VIM (n=9), NDM-1 (n=5), KPC (n=1) and GES (n=1). The increasing emergence and dissemination of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli has From the 44 CPE isolates, 26 isolates were identified reduced significantly the options for sufficient as Klebsiella pneumoniae (68% of the OXA-48 CPE), 8 Fig. 2: Susceptibility (%) of OXA-48-producing MDRE to Fig. 4: Susceptibility (%) of NDM-producing MDRE to Alternative antibiotic therapy. The genes encoding most of these as Escherichia coli, 6 as Enterobacter cloacae, 2 as Alternative Antibiotics Antibiotics carbapenemases reside on plasmids or transposons Citrobacter freundii,1 as Providencia stuartii and 1 as carrying additional resistance genes which confer Morganella morganii. multidrug resistance to the isolates. 31 isolates (70%) were causing an infection, including urinary tract infection (20%), respiratory tract MATERIALS AND METHODS infection (18%), abdominal infection (18%), bacteraemia (9%) and skin and soft tissue infection In the present study, we tested the in vitro activity of (5%). 13 isolates were believed to be colonizers. antimicrobial agents against a well-characterized c o l l e c t i o n o f c a r b a p e n e m a s e - p r o d u c i n g Isolates were classified as 32 MDRE and 13 XDRE. Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) collected from clinical The majority of the XDRE were OXA-48 encoding In vitro activity of MDRE and XDRE CRE to the antibiotics tested: Meropenem (MERO), Imipenem (IMI), Ertapenem (ERTA), Fosfomycin (FOSFO), Colistin (COL), Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CAZ- samples of a tertiary care hospital in Germany during AVI), Tygecicline (TYGE), Gentamycin (GENTA), Tobramycin (TOBRA), Amikacin (AMIKA), Ceftolozane-Tazobactam (CTT), Chloramphenicol (CHLOR) and Aztreonam (AZTRE) isolates (n=9). However, the NDM-1 encoding CPE 2016-2017. Multidrug resistant enterobacteria isolates showed higher resistance to a major number (MDRE) and extremely drug resistant enterobacteria of antimicrobials. Overall, the isolates showed high (XDRE) were defined following the ESCMID criteria. rates of resistance to many antimicrobial agents Ceftazidime-avibactam showed an outstanding CONCLUSIONS tested. The rank order of in vitro activity was as activity only against OXA-48 positive isolates (93%). The in vitro activity of the antimicrobial agents follows: colistin (89% susceptible), amikacin (82%), In this group colistin did also show a good activity. The remaining therapeutic options for CRE tested was determined using broth microdilution and fosfomycin (80%), ceftazidime-avibactam (70%), Overall fosfomycin was a good alternative drug. It infections are scarce, but still available. Overall E-Test methods. Susceptibility testing was chloramphenicol (58%), tigecycline (55%), was very active (MIC90, <16 μg/ml) against isolates colistin, amikacin, fosfomycin show the best activity. determined for all the antimicrobials needed for the meropenem (50%), gentamycin (41%), ceftolozane- carrying metallobetalactamases (93% susceptible), S u s c e p t i b i l i t y v a r i e s d e p e n d i n g o n t h e MDRE definitions, including ertapenem, imipenem, tazobactam, imipenem, aztreonam, tobramycin (23%) especially VIM-carbapenemases (100%). In this later carbapenemase-type. CRE were causing an infection meropenem, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane- and ertapenem (5%). group amikacin was also very active (100%). in most of the cases. tazobactam, fosfomycin, colistin, tigecycline, Surprisingly, chloramphenicol (80%) showed good gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, chloramphenicol S u s c e p t i b i l i t y p a t t e r n s d e p e n d e d o n t h e activity (MIC90, 12 μg/ml) against NDM-1 encoding and aztreonam. carbapenemase-type. CPE. Max Von Pettenkofer Institut o Faculty of Medicine of Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (Germany) )o Contact us by E-mail: [email protected].

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us