Observations on the Bourne Gutter 2014 Approx.)

Observations on the Bourne Gutter 2014 Approx.)

valley bottom from Bourne End to White Hill as valley gravels. Most likely these fluvial deposits are Late Devensian in age (26-12 ka Observations on the Bourne Gutter 2014 approx.). A synthesis of ideas and contemporary understanding of the hydrology in the area is detailed by Catt (2010, Chapter 9). In 2012 the summer was wet Nicholas Pierpoint and limited flow was observed in the Bourne Gutter from March The exceptionally high rainfall experienced in the flow in 2014, attempts to correlate local rainfall to April 2013. In the winter of southern England in the winter of 2014 has been data with corresponding flow periods, and for interest 2013/14 heavy rainfall resulted in well documented and described widely in the press. replicates some of the flow measurements documented full stream flow from the Banks For some in the Thames Valley this was traumatic. by Glennie (1960, 1962). Stream discharge data were Rise (SP 989051, Photo 1) all the However in west Hertfordshire it was interesting acquired using a Valeport Electromagnetic Flow Meter way to the confluence with the to see flow again in the Bourne Gutter, which flows at four stations. They were chosen to establish the flow River Bulbourne at Bourne End Photo 1. Banks Rise – pool/source of the Gutter. as a consequence of exceptional seasonal rainfall. contribution from Mounts Rise and identify if there (Photo 6). Chalk Rock is shown on Observational notes describing the extent of the flow was any contribution from the swallow-hole at Bottom the valley floor at Banks Rise on from 4 March to 23 April in 2013 were documented by Farm. The flow rates and stream temperatures are BGS sheet 238, in line with the idea Pierpoint (2013). detailed on Fig. 1. that the springs rise at or near the The Bourne Gutter is an occasional tributary Most of the springs in the Bourne Gutter catchment contact between the Chalk Rock ‘winterbourn’, which rises 3km to the west of area are thought to be in the upper reaches of the and the Lewes Nodular Chalk. Berkhamsted and flows into the River Bulbourne at valley near the contact between the Chalk Rock and My observations recorded Bourne End (Photo 6), which in turn meets the Gade at the Lewes Nodular Chalk, which have contrasting flow in the Bourne Gutter from Two Waters in Hemel Hempstead. The Bourne Gutter permeability characteristics. The Chalk Rock is 15 February (conversations with is a ‘woe water’ and is said to flow at times of war or fissured/fractured, whereas the Lewes Nodular Chalk local dog walkers suggested it disasters. If this were the case flow should be seen on includes the Caburn and Southerham Marls that form started 12/13th of that month). an annual basis! barriers to water flow. The British Geological Survey The initial flow was from Mounts This article provides observations of the extent of (BGS) Aylesbury Sheet 238 (1923) shows much of the Rise or Culvert Rise (Photos 2 & 3) downstream continuously to the Fig.1. A sketch map of the Bourne Gutter (Hertfordshire Bourne), Hertfordshire. River Bulbourne in Bourne End. By 1 March a large pool at Culvert Rise upstream of White Hill Lane had appeared. In fact it extended 300m and 5-30m wide to within 30-50m Photo 2. Culvert Rise –White Hill Lane. of the property boundary at Corner Spring described by Glennie (1960) (SP988051). It extended back through a stand of conifers, which are 40-50 years old, and were not mentioned by Glennie (1960 & 1962). They obscured the Larks Rise spring (SP995553), which was not possible to find. Flow was continuous from Banks Rise to the Bourne Gutter/ Bulbourne confluence in Bourne End on 8 March. The flow was continuous across the meadow downstream of Bottom Farm in contrast with the flow monitored in 2013. Flow started to wane after 10 April 2014. The source spring Photo 3. Mounts Rise Rise –White Hill Lane. 136 Trans. Herts. Nat. Hist. Soc. 46(2) 2014 Trans. Herts. Nat. Hist. Soc. 46(2) 2014 137 (Banks Rise – Photo 1) had dried up stream discharge, the rate of 0.1053 m3/sec measured active member of the Hertfordshire Natural History by then and there was no surface flow at Station 1 would fill an Olympic 50m (2500 m3) Society, suggested that flow in the Bourne Gutter to Corner Spring. Also the large pool swimming pool in 6.5 hours. required at least 32 inches of rainfall per year. I believe upstream of Culvert Rise/White Hill The water temperature upstream of Mounts Rise on the relationship is more complex. Further work is Lane had significantly diminished in size 1 March 2014 was 8.75°C, but at Mounts Rise itself the required, as several cycles of increasing or decreasing and depth. By 18 May there was no flow water temperature was 9.5°C, with an air temperature rainfall can be seen. at Bottom Farm across the ‘Buttercup’ of 6°C (Map 1). Glennie (1960) recorded a constant Flow in the Bourne Gutter is not only dependent Meadow whereas the previous week temperature of 49°F (9.6°C from Mounts Rise). on the preceding year’s rainfall, but also when it falls, (May 11th) flow had been continuous At the Bottom Farm swallow-hole and at the pools and, critically, on the aquifer level. This is illustrated from Culvert Rise through to Bourne at Culvert Rise and Banks Rise, it was common to see in the second rainfall chart (Fig. 3). The rainfall in End. small bubbles less than 5mm across rising through the 2012 was principally in the summer, when there was The culvert under the A41 near Vale water. It is suggested these result from air expelled more vegetation cover, so that the aquifer was not so Farm was partially blocked for a period, from the unsaturated chalk as the water table rose. efficiently recharged. The duration and length of flow which resulted in a large pool upstream The bubbles cannot be biogenic gas of the A41 Motorway. At the rather as the pools had only existed for insignificant confluence with the River a few days. Mallard ducks quickly Bulbourne at Bourne End, the Bourne exploited this new habitat and Photo 4. Bottom Farm –White Hill Lane. Gutter flows through a circular culvert broods of ducklings have been seen into Mill Leet in the grounds of The at both Bottom Farm swallow- Watermill Hotel (Photo 6). hole and the pool above White Discharge flow data were acquired Hill Lane. Herons were also seen at four stations (Fig 1). At Station 4, hunting for Frogs (successfully). upstream of Mounts Rise (SP 995057), Two of the principal controls the flow was 0.0697 m3/sec and below on flow in the Bourne Gutter the spring (Station 3) it was 0.0818 are the rainfall distribution and m3/sec on the same day, suggesting the subsurface geology. Monthly an increase in discharge of 15% from rainfall data were provided by the spring at Mounts Rise. Photo 3 Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, shows a visible increase in the flow which is 11 miles to the east. above and below the spring. At Station This is not the nearest weather 2, downstream of the swallow-hole at station but it is likely that major Bottom Farm, there was a further 16.5% frontal systems provide the critical increase in discharge compared with precipitation that recharges Station 3. This suggests the swallow- the aquifer and that localised Fig. 2. Rothamsted Research monthly rainfall January 1995 to April 2014. hole at Bottom Farm was being fed differences in rainfall are not Photo 5. Looking upstream to Bottom Farm. by another spring. The difference in significant. Monthly rainfall discharge between the two sites on values at Rothamsted since 1995 Buttercup Meadow (Stations 2 and are shown in Fig. 2 and periods 1) was 6.9% (increase downstream), of Bourne Gutter flow are shown but this is interpreted as a measure of in red. The period since 2005 is natural variation in flow, not the result expanded in Fig. 3. of a further spring contribution. In 2004 a new aerodynamically Glennie (1961) quoted discharge data styled tipping bucket rain gauge for sites from above and below Mounts (TBR) was installed at Rothamsted Rise. The figures quoted were 60,000 Research to replace a manually gals/hr above Mounts Rise and 140,000 read cylindrical rain gauge. The gals/hr (0.101 m3/sec) below – implying team at Rothamsted estimate that 80,000 gals/hr were coming from the new TBR captures 10.5% that spring, which represents a 57% more rainfall than that of the increase in flow, much greater than the old cylindrical gauge, but no 15% increase I measured. The decrease adjustment has been made to the in contribution since 1961 may reflect data pre-2004 to bring it into line the increase in groundwater drawdown with recent values. over the last 50+ years. Based on his observations (1897 Photo 6. Bourne Gutter/River Bulbourne confluence. To help give some perspective on to 1917), John Hopkinson, an Fig. 3. Rothamsted Research monthly rainfall January 2005 to April 2014. 138 Trans. Herts. Nat. Hist. Soc. 46(2) 2014 Trans. Herts. Nat. Hist. Soc. 46(2) 2014 139 A soil quality comparison from agriculture to afforestation in Heartwood Forest Ashley Lydiate and Chantal V. Helm Introduction further afforestation projects occurring on abandoned The benefits of afforestation as mitigation for climate agricultural land in the UK in the future, it is crucial to change and the promotion of biologically diverse achieve a robust understanding of what management wildlife communities are becoming increasingly techniques may need to be employed to ensure healthy recognised as having global importance (Berthrong et woodland growth on and around altered and improved al., 2009; Malhi et al., 2002; Woodland Trust, 2011; soils, if any.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    3 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us