At- Home Telemedicine for Medical Abortion in Australia

At- Home Telemedicine for Medical Abortion in Australia

Original research At- home telemedicine for medical abortion in Australia: a qualitative study of patient experiences and recommendations Laura Fix ,1 Jane W Seymour,1 Monisha Vaid Sandhu,2 Catriona Melville,2 Danielle Mazza,3 Terri- Ann Thompson1 1Ibis Reproductive Health, ABSTRACT Cambridge, Massachusetts, Key messages Introduction This study aimed to explore patient United States 2 Marie Stopes Australia, experiences obtaining a medical abortion using ► Delivery of medical abortion using Melbourne, Victoria, Australia an at- home telemedicine service operated by telemedicine at- home is convenient and 3Department of General Practice, Marie Stopes Australia. Monash University, Notting Hill, acceptable to patients. Victoria, Australia Methods From July to October 2017, we ► At- home telemedicine may improve conducted semistructured in- depth telephone access to medical abortion in settings Correspondence to interviews with a convenience sample of medical where travel distance and travel costs Laura Fix, Ibis Reproductive abortion patients from Marie Stopes Australia. impede patient access to services. Health, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA; lfix@ ibis repr oduc tive health. We analysed interview data for themes relating ► Additional provider education about org to patient experiences prior to service initiation, medical abortion, and the use of at- during an at- home telemedicine medical home telemedicine for its delivery, can Received 10 February 2020 Revised 13 May 2020 abortion visit, and after completing the medical help support patient access to care. Accepted 14 May 2020 abortion. Results We interviewed 24 patients who obtained care via the at- home telemedicine BACKGROUND medical abortion service. Patients selected The Australian Therapeutic Goods Admin- at- home telemedicine due to convenience, istration approved a mifepristone and ability to remain at home and manage personal misoprostol combination pack for termi- responsibilities, and desires for privacy. A few nation of pregnancy up to 63 days gesta- 1 telemedicine patients reported that a lack of tion in 2014. Approval of this regimen general practitioner knowledge of abortion and its subsequent availability on the Phar- services impeded their access to care. Most maceutical Benefits Scheme, a Depart- telemedicine patients felt at- home telemedicine ment of Health programme subsidising was of equal or superior privacy to in- person medication costs for eligible residents, has care and nearly all felt comfortable during the increased access to early medical abortion in Australia.2 However, access remains telemedicine visit. Most were satisfied with the limited, particularly for those in rural home delivery of the abortion medications and Australia who face logistical barriers to would recommend the service. ► http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ abortion care, including difficulty obtaining Conclusion Patient reports suggest that an at- bmjsrh- 2020- 200703 information about abortion, high proce- home telemedicine model for medical abortion dure and ancillary costs, and long travel is a convenient and acceptable mode of service distances to a provider.3 Although general © Author(s) (or their delivery that may reduce patient travel and out- practitioners (GPs) in Australia can legally employer(s)) 2020. No of- pocket costs. Additional provider education provide medical abortion, they may have commercial re- use. See rights about this model may be necessary in order and permissions. Published by concerns about stigma, scope of practice or 4 BMJ. to improve continuity of patient care. Further may personally oppose the practice. Some study of the impacts of this model on patients medical abortion patients in Australia have To cite: Fix L, Seymour JW, Sandhu MV, et al. BMJ Sex is needed to inform patient care and determine encountered stigma or received inadequate Reprod Health whether such a model is appropriate for similar information about abortion methods and 2020;46:172–176. geographical and legal contexts. services from a GP; such experiences may 172 Fix L, et al. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2020;46:172–176. doi:10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200612 Original research limit or delay abortion access even in cases where finan- Table 1 Respondent characteristics cial or geographic barriers are not present.5 Clinic- to- clinic telemedicine to deliver medical abor- Characteristics (n=24) tion, where patients at one site meet via video with Age, mean (range) 28 (20–43) physicians at another site, has been shown to improve Children at home 6 7 access to abortion in the US. An evaluation of an 0 12 Australian direct- to- patient telephone- based telemedi- 1–2 7 cine model for medical abortion found it to be accept- able to patients; many who used the service resided ≥3 5 outside of major urban areas and accessed the service Marital status 8 via a referral from another healthcare provider. Single 16 In 2015, Marie Stopes Australia (MSA) launched Married/de facto 7 an at- home telemedicine for medical abortion service. Separated 1 Patients are eligible for this service if they reside in an Australian territory where abortion via telemedicine Education is legal, are 16 years of age or older, reside within ≤High school 9 a 2- hour drive of emergency care and can read and ≥Some college 15 understand English. Eligible patients obtain a referral, ultrasound and lab testing through a GP. Patients consent before conducting each interview. The interview then meet remotely via secure videoconference or guide included questions about participant reproductive telephone call with the treating MSA clinician, have history, discovery of the index pregnancy, abortion deci- abortion medications delivered to their home for self- sion making, abortion information sources, experience administration, obtain follow- up beta human chorionic locating a provider, service experience including wait gonadotropin (bHCG) testing at a local laboratory and times and medication delivery, follow-up experiences and have a final telephone follow-up with MSA nursing recommendations. All interviews were audio recorded staff within 2 weeks of self-administration to confirm and transcribed verbatim. On interview completion, termination of pregnancy. All patients have access to a participants were eligible to receive an $A50 emailed 24- hour helpline. In 2017, videoconference consults gift card. The study team developed a priori codes and were discontinued due to the technology and internet refined the codebook iteratively as themes emerged. Two being inaccessible for some patients, and are instead researchers (JWS and LF) trained in qualitative research conducted by phone. independently coded each interview. The study team The aim of this study was to explore the experi- then conducted a thematic analysis to identify top-level ences of patients who obtained a medical abortion themes across interviews. using MSA’s at- home telemedicine service, and gain a nuanced understanding of the barriers and facilitators RESULTS of accessing care through this model. Demographics We interviewed 24 MSA patients who had a medical METHODS abortion via the at- home telemedicine model. Partici- Between July and October 2017, we conducted pant age ranged from 20 to 43 years old, half had no semistructured in- depth telephone interviews with a children, most were single and most had some college convenience sample of MSA medical abortion patients. or postsecondary education (table 1). These interviews comprise the qualitative component of a multimethods study. Participants were recruited Experiences prior to service initiation from a group of MSA medical abortion patients who Source of information had opted to enrol in the study and completed an Participants learnt where they could obtain abortion care online survey about their abortion experience; these from a variety of sources, with some consulting multiple survey data will be reported separately. Patients were sources (table 2). Most participants learnt where they eligible to participate in the study if they had obtained could obtain abortion care from a GP or other doctor. a medical abortion from MSA via the at-home tele- Some found information through online searches and medicine service, and had already completed the one from the Children by Choice website. Others learnt online English language self- administered survey. On about abortion services at MSA from a friend. completing the survey, respondents were invited to Participants learnt about the at-home telemedicine provide their contact information in an online form, service from different sources. Most first learnt about delinked from their survey responses, if interested in it on speaking with MSA staff, many from the MSA being contacted by a study coordinator for an inter- website, and a few from a GP. One heard about the view. telemedicine service from a friend, and another from An Australian- based study coordinator (MVS) trained MSA staff when she attended a clinic appointment for in human subjects research obtained verbal informed an assessment. Fix L, et al. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2020;46:172–176. doi:10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200612 173 Original research Table 2 Patient experiences throughout the care timeline Theme Illustrative quote Abortion information My doctor gave me a referral. And then, I called the call center and just said, hey. My doctor’s given me a referral, basically. And then, I asked about the options, and they explained the difference between a medical abortion and a surgical abortion…So then, I asked them because I was like, I had a look on your website. And it was like, the telemedicine one is cheaper. And they said, oh, yeah. That can be done over the phone. You need to get your scans and stuff done by a GP first. The scans and the blood work. And, at that point in time, I already had done my scans and blood work, or I had done all my blood work. And I was already booked in for a scan. So, yes. It was a cheaper option. Because I wanted to do the tele-abortion. The reason I went with telemedicine was because it was cheaper. (Participant 28) Decision making The option was to either go into the clinic, and if the times worked out to use the medication or if it was too late to do surgical.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us