16. Ergodicity

16. Ergodicity

MATH41112/61112 Ergodic Theory Lecture 16 16. Ergodicity x16.1 Ergodicity In this lecture, we introduce what it means to say that a transformation is ergodic with respect to an invariant measure. Ergodicity is an important concept for many reasons, not least because Birkhoff's Ergodic Theorem holds: Theorem 16.1 Let T be an ergodic transformation of the probability space (X; B; µ) and let f 2 L1(X; B; µ). Then n−1 1 f(T jx) ! f dµ n Xj=0 Z for µ-almost every x 2 X. x16.2 The definition of ergodicity Definition. Let (X; B; µ) be a probability space and let T : X ! X be a measure-preserving transformation. We say that T is an ergodic transfor- mation (or µ is an ergodic measure) if, for B 2 B, T −1B = B ) µ(B) = 0 or 1: Remark. One can view ergodicity as an indecomposability condition. If ergodicity does not hold and we have T −1A = A with 0 < µ(A) < 1, then one can split T : X ! X into T : A ! A and T : X n A ! X n A 1 1 with invariant probability measures µ(A) µ(· \ A) and 1−µ(A) µ(· \ (X n A)), respectively. It will sometimes be convenient for us to weaken the condition T −1B = B to µ(T −1B4B) = 0, where 4 denotes the symmetric difference: A4B = (A n B) [ (B n A): The next lemma allows us to do this. Lemma 16.2 −1 −1 If B 2 B satisfies µ(T B4B) = 0 then there exists B1 2 B with T B1 = B1 and µ(B4B1) = 0. (In particular, µ(B) = µ(B1).) 1 MATH41112/61112 Ergodic Theory Lecture 16 Proof. For each j ≥ 0, we have the inclusion j−1 T −jB4B ⊂ T −(i+1)B4T −iB i[=0 j−1 = T −i(T −1B4B) i[=0 and so (since T preserves µ) µ(T −jB4B) ≤ jµ(T −1B4B) = 0: Let 1 1 −i B1 = T B: j\=0 i[=j We have that 1 1 µ B4 T −iB ≤ µ(B4T −iB) = 0: 0 1 i[=j Xi=j @ A 1 −i Since the sets i=j T B decrease as j increases we hence have µ(B4B1) = 0. Also, S 1 1 −1 −(i+1) T B1 = T B j=0 i=j \1 [1 −i = T B = B1; j\=0 i=[j+1 as required. 2 Corollary 16.3 If T is ergodic and µ(T −1B4B) = 0 then µ(B) = 0 or 1. Remark. Occasionally, instead of saying that µ(A4B) = 0, we will say that A = B a.e. or A = B mod 0. x16.3 An alternative characterisation of ergodicity The next result characterises ergodicity in a convenient way. Proposition 16.4 Let T be a measure-preserving transformation of (X; B; µ). The following are equivalent: 2 MATH41112/61112 Ergodic Theory Lecture 16 (i) T is ergodic; (ii) whenever f 2 L1(X; B; µ) satisfies f ◦ T = f µ-a.e. we have that f is constant µ-a.e. Remark. We can replace L1 in the statement by measurable or by L2. Proof. (i) ) (ii): Suppose that T is ergodic and that f 2 L1(X; B; µ) with f ◦ T = f µ-a.e. For k 2 Z and n 2 N, define k k + 1 k k + 1 X(k; n) = x 2 X j ≤ f(x) < = f −1 ; : 2n 2n 2n 2n Since f is measurable, X(k; n) 2 B. We have that T −1X(k; n)4X(k; n) ⊂ fx 2 X j f(T x) 6= f(x)g so that µ(T −1X(k; n)4X(k; n)) = 0: Hence µ(X(k; n)) = 0 or µ(X(k; n)) = 1. For each fixed n, the union k2Z X(k; n) is equal to X up to a set of measure zero, i.e., S µ X4 X(k; n) = 0; 2Z ! k[ and this union is disjoint. Hence we have µ(X(k; n)) = µ(X) = 1 2Z Xk and so there is a unique kn for which µ(X(kn; n)) = 1. Let 1 Y = X(kn; n): n=1 \ Then µ(Y ) = 1 and, by construction, f is constant on Y , i.e., f is constant µ-a.e. −1 1 (ii) ) (i): Suppose that B 2 B with T B = B. Then χB 2 L (X; B; µ) and χB ◦ T (x) = χB(x) 8 x 2 X, so, by hypothesis, χB is constant µ-a.e. Since χB only takes the values 0 and 1, we must have χB = 0 µ-a.e. or χB = 1 µ-a.e. Therefore µ(B) = χB dµ = 0 or 1; ZX and T is ergodic. 2 3 MATH41112/61112 Ergodic Theory Lecture 16 x16.4 Rotations of a circle Fix α 2 R and define T : R=Z ! R=Z by T (x) = x + α mod 1. We have already seen that T preserves Lebesgue measure. Theorem 16.5 Let T (x) = x + α mod 1. (i) If α 2 Q then T is not ergodic. (ii) If α 62 Q then T is ergodic. Proof. Suppose that α 2 Q and write α = p=q for p; q 2 Z with q 6= 0. Define f(x) = e2πiqx 2 L2(X; B; µ): Then f is not constant but f(T x) = e2πiq(x+p=q) = e2πi(qx+p) = e2πiqx = f(x): Hence T is not ergodic. Suppose that α 62 Q. Suppose that f 2 L2(X; B; µ) is such that f ◦T = f a.e. Suppose that f has Fourier series 1 2πinx cne : n=−∞ X Then f ◦ T has Fourier series 1 2πinα 2πinx cne e : n=−∞ X Comparing Fourier coefficients we see that 2πinα cn = cne ; 2πinα for all n 2 Z. As α 62 Q, e 6= 1 unless n = 0. Hence cn = 0 for n 6= 0. Hence f has Fourier series c0, i.e. f is constant a.e. 2 Exercise 16.1 Show that, when α 2 Q, the rotation T (x) = x + α mod 1 is not ergodic from the definition, i.e. find an invariant set B = T −1B which has Lebesgue measure 0 < µ(B) < 1. 4.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us