A Competency-Based Approach to Leadership Development in Schools in the East Riding of Yorkshire

A Competency-Based Approach to Leadership Development in Schools in the East Riding of Yorkshire

THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL An exploration of competency-based leadership development and its application in education exemplified by a case study of the East Riding of Yorkshire Local Authority being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Hull by David Arthur Stork M.A. (Cantab.), M.Ed., F.R.S.A. November 2013 1 An exploration of competency-based leadership development and its application in education Contents List of tables, figures and charts ............................................................................. 3 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................6 Glossary of acronyms.................................................................................................7 Preamble .............................................................................................................. 10 Chapter 1: Context and background to the research .............................................. 12 Chapter 2: Contextual issues influencing the research ........................................... 20 Chapter 3: Development of a competency based approach to leadership development in the East Riding ............................................................................ 61 Chapter 4: Methodology ..................................................................................... 139 Chapter 5: Results of the field-work ................................................................... 181 Chapter 6: The post-empirical phase: answers to the research questions ............. 224 Chapter 7: Conclusions and implications ............................................................ 244 Appendix 1: Written request to two individuals to take part in pilot interviews ... 254 Appendix 2: Ethics documentation ..................................................................... 256 Annex 1: Comparison between the National Standards for Headship and the East Riding Competency Framework ......................................................................... 267 Annex 2: The East Riding Competency Framework............................................ 297 References .......................................................................................................... 316 2 An exploration of competency-based leadership development and its application in education List of tables, figures and charts Tables Table 2.1: Catchment areas of East Riding Secondary School partnerships...................21 Table 2.2: January 2009 pupil numbers (totals per year group)......................................32 Table 2.3: Summary totals: Primary School Pupil numbers, (East Riding) 1996 – 2013.....................................................................................................................33 Table 2.4: Summary totals: Secondary School Pupil numbers, (East Riding) 1996 - 2013......................................................................................................................33 Table 2.5: a summary of teachers’ traditional career progression compared with current issues...........................................................................................................54 Table 3.1: Development Centre Activities and their manifestation in the East Riding.................................................................................................................75 Table 3.2: Key Features of Development Centres and their manifestation in the East Riding.................................................................................................................75 Table 3.3: Issues in Development Centre usage and how they are addressed in the East Riding:...............................................................................................................76 Table 3.4: The Hay McBer competency clusters reproduced from West-Burnham and O’Sullivan (1996) p. 11...................................................................................................79 Table 3.5: School Management South Competence Framework (reproduced from West-Burnham and O’Sullivan (1996, p.12)......................................80 Table 3.6: The NEAC Competency framework (reproduced from West-Burnham and O’Sullivan (1996) p.13:......................................80 Table 3.7: Characteristics of highly effective headteachers (TTA 1998) reproduced from Male (2000 p.6)....................................................................................82 Table 3.8: Comparison of leadership and management (reproduced from Alimo-Metcalfe and Alban-Metcalfe (2002), p.317 (adapted by them from kotter 1990)...............................................................................87 Table 3.9: A comparison between the original and revised East Riding competency frameworks.................................................................................................95 Table 3.10: The East Riding Competency Framework...................................................96 Table 3.11 The Communication competency from the East Riding Framework...........98 Table 3.12: Myers-Briggs dichotomies.........................................................................109 3 An exploration of competency-based leadership development and its application in education Table 3.13: The competencies and the activities at the LDC which are used to measure them....................................................................................................118 Table 3.14: ER Competencies not related to actions in the Headteacher Standards..................................................................................................126 Table 3.15: competencies, professional standards and their relationship to OFSTED inspection criteria......................................................................................130 Table 4.1: Cohort numbers, March 2008 – May 2009..................................................159 Table 4.2: Proportions of the workforce by gender (ER/National, 2007 GTC)............160 Table 4.3: Staff breakdown by category........................................................................161 Table 4.4: Routes to the Leadership Development Centre (Sample population)..........161 Table 4.5: Numbers and percentage of study population who have changed status.....169 Table 4.6: Current status of those (32) who have progressed in their career following the Centre .....................................................................................................169 Table 4.7: List of reasons for non-progression where progression was at least temporarily precluded (11 individuals).............................................................170 Table 4.8: determination of the proportion of interviewees in each category...............171 Table 5.1: Interviewees’ profile data.............................................................................182 Table 5.2: Interviewees’ characteristics: MBTI profiles and competencies.................183 Table 5.3: Frequency of “self” scores which are below the overall average by competency...............................................................................................................193 Table 6.1 West-Burnham’s taxonomy of the requirements for successful leadership at systems level..................................................................................................................233 Figures Figure 3.1: The relative importance of power, affiliation and achievement in a “good” leader (NCSL)..............................................................................................63 Figure 3.2: A model of effective job performance reproduced from Boyatzis (1982) p.13.......................................................................................................65 Figure 3.3: Better than chance? adapted from Smith (1989)..........................................71 Figure 3.4: Model of Leadership Effectiveness (TTA 1998) adapted from Male (2000 p.7).........................................................................................83 4 An exploration of competency-based leadership development and its application in education Charts: Chart 4.1 Analysis of initial impact responses: Cohorts 1-8 (57) and all delegates (130)...............................................................................................................................163 Chart 4.2a: Distribution of Myers-Briggs personality characteristics...........................165 Chart 4.2b: Myers-Briggs personality type indicators compared..................................165 Chart 4.3: Strengths and Areas for development identified for sample cohort (2007-9) and all LDC delegates (2007-11)....................................................................167 Chart 5.1: Summary of initial impact evaluations 2007-2011 by year: percentage of delegates giving the highest score.................................................................................176 Chart 5.2: Composite results from the follow-up questionnaire...................................185 Chart 5.3: Comparison of strengths and areas for development, all delegates cohorts 1-18..............................................................................................199 Chart 5.4: Strengths/Areas for development (from chart 5.3) shown as operational competencies compared to interpersonal competencies...............................................201 5 An exploration of competency-based leadership

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    320 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us