KC & Associates Investigations Research Associates Quinault Valley Guns & Blades / Urban Escape & Evasion Course International Relations * Military * Terrorism * Business * Security www.kcandassociates.org [email protected] Kathleen Louise dePass Press Agent/Publicist .360.288.2652 Triste cosa es no tener amigos, pero más triste ha de ser no tener enemigos porque quién no tenga enemigos señal es de que no tiene talento que haga sombra, ni carácter que impresione, ni valor temido, ni honra de la que se murmure, ni bienes que se le codicien, ni cosa alguna que se le envidie. A sad thing it is to not have friends, but even sadder must it be not having any enemies; that a man should have no enemies is a sign that he has no talent to outshine others, nor character that inspires, nor valor that is feared, nor honor to be rumored, nor goods to be coveted, nor anything to be envied. -Jose Marti Briefing Paper Saudi Arabian nation-state involvement in 9/11 Attacks on WTC From the desk of Craig B Hulet? September 12, 2011 Saudi Arabian nation-state involvement in 9/11 Attacks on WTC/WTO By Craig B Hulet? Although the use of the term al Qaeda remains dubious and as I’ve stated many times it was never used prior to the 9/11 attacks in any diplomatic cable, declassified documents, state department travel warnings, nor anywhere else for that matter, one is forced into this paradigmatically useful term after ten years of that forced usage. And bearing this in mind and that it was not Ussamah Bin Laden who orchestrated 9/11, please allow the point to be taken here for making my argument, which is all we can do these days. The FBI never claimed he did 9/11 under his [their] “Most Wanted” description, nor was there ever any grand jury indictment handed down as Alan M. Dershowitz charged in his diatribe against Noam Chomsky’s late arguments which mirrored my own of ten years. And nor was there any proper translations of any such “taking credit” for 9/11 by Bin Laden. But here below we are seeing someone recognize that there was no way anyone, no entity, no group no matter what they called themselves or didn’t call themselves that could have pulled off 9/11 without the Saudi state apparatus’s involvement: “Lloyd's insurance says the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and its banks and charities, which sponsored al Qaeda, should pay the more than $215 million the insurer has spent on insurance settlements to families of the victims of 9/11. "Absent the sponsorship of al Qaeda's material sponsors and supporters, including the defendants named herein, al Qaeda would not have possessed the capacity to conceive, plan and execute the September 11th Attacks," the insurer says. Named as defendants are the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina, the Saudi Joint Relief Committee for Kosovo and Chechnya, the Saudi Red Crescent Society, National Commercial Bank, Al Rajhi Banking and Investment Company, Prince Salman Bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud, Suleiman Abdel Aziz Al Rajhi [CEO of al Rajhi Bank], and Yassin Al Qadi [employee of al Rajhi Bank]. Plaintiff, The Underwriting Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 3500, says it has already paid more than $215 million in claims for the "9/11 Aviation cases." "Through the instant action, plaintiff seeks recovery of amounts paid on behalf of its insureds in settlement of the 9/11 Aviation cases, and amounts expended in relation to the defense of its insureds in the 9/11 Aviation Litigation, from parties who knowingly provided material support and resources to al Qaeda in the years leading up to the September 11th Attacks, and who by virtue of their intentional conduct bear primary responsibility for the injuries resulting from the September 11th Attacks." [end quote] (See: http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/09/12/Lloyds911.pdf ) That the charges do not include the Saudi’s highly sophisticated intelligence organizations, it is implied in the arguments made herein. One can only hope the Lloyds legal team finds its way to the classified documents removed from the 9/11 Commission’s possession by the FBI and classified for 30 years; this then is where Senator Bob Graham stated in his press conference immediately thereafter the documents were seized which detailed nation-state involvement in the act of 9/11. Senator Bob Graham argued on NPR regarding the 9/11 hearings: "I think there is very compelling evidence that at least some of the terrorists were assisted, not just in financing -- although that was part of it -- by a sovereign foreign government and that we have been derelict in our duty to track that down, make the further case, or find the evidence that would indicate that that is not true and we can look for other reasons why the terrorists were able to function so effectively in the United States." GWEN IFILL: "Do you think that will ever become public, which countries you're talking about? " SEN. BOB GRAHAM: It will become public at some point when it's turned over to the archives, but that's 20 or 30 years from now. And, we need to have this information now because it's relevant to the threat that the people of the United States are facing today.” Though he failed at that press conference at the time to detail Saudi Arabia as one of the maybe more than one nation-state’s involved it is improbable that the evidence he did discover failed to include that nation. With the recent release of the documents titled “Al Qa’ida’s Foreign Fighters in Iraq: A First Look at the Sinjar Records (Source: November 2007, the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point ) which outline in some great detail, that well-over half of all foreign fighters fighting in Iraq (purportedly in Afghanistan and now in Libya) are of Saudi birth including the majority of suicide bombers in all cases, it is contestable that the Saudi regime and its most sophisticated intelligence operations have no knowledge or control over such combined asymmetric warfare. Add to that the Lloyds of London combined law suits against the Saudi regime and the Royal family the picture becomes clearer. Of course immediately after Bob Graham’s bombshells were dropped on Sept. 12th President Obama immediately went public Sept. 16th side by side with the most corrupt King Abdullah stating US and Saudi relationship was doing just fine even though the push for Palestinian statehood the same week has “upset” the little King to no end. And the Arab Spring? Well that too has upset the little King but President Obama has assured the King no Arab Spring will upset our “special relationship” we have with Saudi Arabia, no matter what they perpetrated on 9/11. The latter I added as it is clear Graham’s and Hulet’s remarks, per contra bear no weight at all. By Sept. 20th Lloyds had withdrawn the lawsuit without prejudice though they can always file it again if the Saudi’s do not settle the claim plus treble damages. Buy $1 billion to the Royal family is nothing but change and after all this Obama kissed the ring and with his blessing all is right in the Kingdom. Notwithstanding the gathering evidence! Here is but a bit of the evidence still coming. Former Sen. Bob Graham calls for new 9/11 investigation Former Democratic Senator Bob Graham on Monday called on the U.S. government to reopen its investigation into 9/11 after a report found that links between Saudi Arabia and the hijackers were never disclosed by the FBI to the 2002 joint Congressional intelligence committee investigating the attacks. “In the final report of the congressional inquiry, there was a chapter related primarily to the Saudi role in 9/11 that was totally censored, every word of the chapter has been withheld from the public,” Graham said on MSNBC’s The Dylan Ratigan Show. “Some of the other questions we ought to be asking are if we know that the Saudis who lived in San Diego and now apparently in Sarasota received substantial assistance, what about the Saudis who lived in Phoenix, Arizona? Or Arlington, Virginia? … What was happening in those places?” “I believe these are questions for which there are definitive answers, but the American people and largely their elected representatives have been denied that information.” Also watch this video, courtesy of MSNBC: http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/09/former-sen-bob-graham-calls-for-new-911- investigation/ Any law enforcement officer can point out that too often it is who gains the most by any criminal act that it is then discovered it is they who committed the act or participated in its commitment. Only Saudi Arabia and Israel truly have gained by 9/11 and the wars fought allegedly over this act of terror. While it can be argued US and Western multinational banks and corporations gained via pipelines and other discoveries of raw materials in, say Afghanistan, and that is obvious. (Recall JP Morgan’s elation over its discovery of Rubies and Gold, in the mountainous regions of Afghanistan during 2011!) Iraq’s oil reserves and major water thoroughfares the Tigris and the Euphrates rivers, its central landlocked location encircling Iran which must be isolated according to every US national security study, and the elimination of its war fighting capabilities inclusive of conventional capabilities according to the April 1990 Task Force Report to the White House [the meeting itself was held at the White House] on the Israeli Palestinian Issue, and other notable benefits to both nations already mentioned.