i i “proc16” — 2016/12/12 — 10:17 — page I — #1 i i BLEJSKE DELAVNICE IZ FIZIKE LETNIK 17, STˇ . 2 BLED WORKSHOPS IN PHYSICS VOL. 17, NO. 2 ISSN 1580-4992 Proceedings to the 19th Workshop What Comes Beyond the Standard Models Bled, July 11–19, 2016 Edited by Norma Susana MankoˇcBorˇstnik Holger Bech Nielsen Dragan Lukman DMFA – ZALOZNIˇ STVOˇ LJUBLJANA, DECEMBER 2016 i i i i i i “proc16” — 2016/12/12 — 10:17 — page II — #2 i i The 19th Workshop What Comes Beyond the Standard Models, 11.– 19. July 2016, Bled was organized by Society of Mathematicians, Physicists and Astronomers of Slovenia and sponsored by Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana Society of Mathematicians, Physicists and Astronomers of Slovenia Beyond Semiconductor (MatjaˇzBreskvar) Scientific Committee John Ellis, CERN Roman Jackiw, MIT Masao Ninomiya, Okayama Institute for Quantum Physics Organizing Committee Norma Susana MankoˇcBorˇstnik Holger Bech Nielsen Maxim Yu. Khlopov The Members of the Organizing Committee of the International Workshop “What Comes Beyond the Standard Models”, Bled, Slovenia, state that the articles published in the Proceedings to the 19th Workshop “What Comes Beyond the Standard Models”, Bled, Slovenia are refereed at the Workshop in intense in-depth discussions. i i i i i i “proc16” — 2016/12/12 — 10:17 — page III — #3 i i Workshops organized at Bled . What Comes Beyond the Standard Models (June 29–July 9, 1998), Vol. 0 (1999) No. 1 (July 22–31, 1999) (July 17–31, 2000) (July 16–28, 2001), Vol. 2 (2001) No. 2 (July 14–25, 2002), Vol. 3 (2002) No. 4 (July 18–28, 2003) Vol. 4 (2003) Nos. 2-3 (July 19–31, 2004), Vol. 5 (2004) No. 2 (July 19–29, 2005) , Vol. 6 (2005) No. 2 (September 16–26, 2006), Vol. 7 (2006) No. 2 (July 17–27, 2007), Vol. 8 (2007) No. 2 (July 15–25, 2008), Vol. 9 (2008) No. 2 (July 14–24, 2009), Vol. 10 (2009) No. 2 (July 12–22, 2010), Vol. 11 (2010) No. 2 (July 11–21, 2011), Vol. 12 (2011) No. 2 (July 9–19, 2012), Vol. 13 (2012) No. 2 (July 14–21, 2013), Vol. 14 (2013) No. 2 (July 20–28, 2014), Vol. 15 (2014) No. 2 (July 11–19, 2015), Vol. 16 (2015) No. 2 (July 11–19, 2016), Vol. 17 (2016) No. 2 . Hadrons as Solitons (July 6–17, 1999) . Few-Quark Problems (July 8–15, 2000), Vol. 1 (2000) No. 1 . Selected Few-Body Problems in Hadronic and Atomic Physics (July 7–14, 2001), Vol. 2 (2001) No. 1 . Quarks and Hadrons (July 6–13, 2002), Vol. 3 (2002) No. 3 . Effective Quark-Quark Interaction (July 7–14, 2003), Vol. 4 (2003) No. 1 . Quark Dynamics (July 12–19, 2004), Vol. 5 (2004) No. 1 . Exciting Hadrons (July 11–18, 2005), Vol. 6 (2005) No. 1 . Progress in Quark Models (July 10–17, 2006), Vol. 7 (2006) No. 1 . Hadron Structure and Lattice QCD (July 9–16, 2007), Vol. 8 (2007) No. 1 . Few-Quark States and the Continuum (September 15–22, 2008), Vol. 9 (2008) No. 1 . Problems in Multi-Quark States (June 29–July 6, 2009), Vol. 10 (2009) No. 1 . Dressing Hadrons (July 4–11, 2010), Vol. 11 (2010) No. 1 . Understanding hadronic spectra (July 3–10, 2011), Vol. 12 (2011) No. 1 . Hadronic Resonances (July 1–8, 2012), Vol. 13 (2012) No. 1 . Looking into Hadrons (July 7–14, 2013), Vol. 14 (2013) No. 1 . Quark Masses and Hadron Spectra (July 6–13, 2014), Vol. 15 (2014) No. 1 . Exploring Hadron Resonances (July 5–11, 2015), Vol. 16 (2015) No. 1 . Quarks, Hadrons, Matter (July 3–10, 2016), Vol. 17 (2016) No. 1 . ◦ Statistical Mechanics of Complex Systems (August 27–September 2, 2000) ◦ Studies of Elementary Steps of Radical Reactions in Atmospheric Chemistry (August 25–28, 2001) i i i i i i “proc16” — 2016/12/12 — 10:17 — page IV — #4 i i i i i i i i “proc16” — 2016/12/12 — 10:17 — page V — #5 i i Contents Preface in English and Slovenian Language :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: VII Talk Section :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 1 1 DAMA/LIBRA Results and Perspectives R. Bernabei et al. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 1 2 Experience in Modeling Properties of Fundamental Particles Using Binary Codes E.G. Dmitrieff ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 8 3 Quark and Lepton Masses and Mixing From a Gauged SU(3)F Family Symmetry With a Light O(eV) Sterile Dirac Neutrino A. Hernandez-Galeana´ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 36 4 Nonstandard Cosmologies From Physics Beyond the Standard Model M.Yu. Khlopov :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 52 5 Gauge Fields With Respect to d = (3+1) in the Kaluza-Klein Theories and in the Spin-charge-family Theory D. Lukman and N.S. Mankocˇ Borstnikˇ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 66 6 Spin-charge-family Theory is Offering Next Step in Understanding Elementary Particles and Fields and Correspondingly Universe N.S. Mankocˇ Borstnikˇ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 77 7 Do Present Experiments Exclude the Fourth Family Quarks as Well as the Existence of More Than One Scalar? N.S. Mankocˇ Borstnikˇ and H.B.F. Nielsen ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 128 8 The Spin-charge-family Theory Offers Understanding of the Triangle Anomalies Cancellation in the Standard Model N.S. Mankocˇ Borstnikˇ and H.B.F. Nielsen ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 147 9 The New LHC-Peak is a Bound State of 6 Top + 6 Anti top H.B. Nielsen :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 157 10 Progressing Beyond the Standard Models B.A. Robson ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 177 i i i i i i “proc16” — 2016/12/12 — 10:17 — page VI — #6 i i VI Contents Discussion Section :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 189 11 Discreteness of Point Charge in Nonlinear Electrodynamics A.I. Breev and A.E. Shabad:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 191 12 The Hypothesis of Unity of the Higgs Field With the Coulomb Field E.G. Dmitrieff ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 201 13 What Cosmology Can Come From the Broken SU(3) Symmetry of the Three Known Families? A. Hernandez´ Galeana and M.Yu. Khlopov ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 204 14 Phenomenological Mass Matrices With a Democratic Warp A. Kleppe ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 210 Virtual Institute of Astroparticle Physics Presentation ::::::::::::::::::: 219 15 Virtual Institute of Astroparticle Physics — Scientific-Educational Platform for Physics Beyond the Standard Model M.Yu. Khlopov :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 221 i i i i i i “proc16” — 2016/12/12 — 10:17 — page VII — #7 i i Preface The series of workshops on ”What Comes Beyond the Standard Models?” started in 1998 with the idea of Norma and Holger for organizing a real workshop, in which participants would spend most of the time in discussions, confronting different approaches and ideas. It is the nineteenth workshop which took place this year in the picturesque town of Bled by the lake of the same name, surrounded by beautiful mountains and offering pleasant walks and mountaineering. In our very open minded, friendly, cooperative, long, tough and demanding dis- cussions several physicists and even some mathematicians have contributed. Most of topics presented and discussed in our Bled workshops concern the proposals how to explain physics beyond the so far accepted and experimentally confirmed both standard models - in elementary particle physics and cosmology. Although most of participants are theoretical physicists, many of them with their own sug- gestions how to make the next step beyond the accepted models and theories, experts from experimental laboratories were very appreciated, helping a lot to understand what do measurements really tell and which kinds of predictions can best be tested. The (long) presentations (with breaks and continuations over several days), fol- lowed by very detailed discussions, have been extremely useful, at least for the organizers. We hope and believe, however, that this is the case also for most of participants, including students. Many a time, namely, talks turned into very ped- agogical presentations in order to clarify the assumptions and the detailed steps, analyzing the ideas, statements, proofs of statements and possible predictions, confronting participants’ proposals with the proposals in the literature or with proposals of the other participants, so that all possible weak points of the propos- als showed up very clearly. The ideas therefore seem to develop in these years considerably much faster than they would without our workshops. This year experiments have not brought much new, although a lot of work and effort has been put in, but the news will come when the analyses of the data gathered with 13 TeV on the LHC will be done. The analyses might show whether there are the new family and the new scalar fields (both predicted by the spin- charge-family theory and discussed in this proceedings), as well as whether the two events, the ≈ 750 GeV resonance decaying into two photons (predicted by Multiple-Point-Principle) and the ≈ 1:8 TeV resonance decaying into several products, are nontheless real, manifesting new scalar fields. They may see the dark matter constituents, or rather not since they are much heavier neutral baryons. i i i i i i “proc16” — 2016/12/12 — 10:17 — page VIII — #8 i i The new data might answer the question, whether laws of nature are elegant (as predicted by the spin-charge-family theory and also — up to the families — other Kaluza-Klein-like theories and the string theories) or she is “just using gauge groups when needed” (what many models do). While the spin-charge-family theory predicts the fourth family members as well as several new scalar fields which determine the higgs and the Yukawa couplings, the high energy physicists do not expect the existence of the fourth family members at all. Their expectation relies on the analyses of the experimental data grounded on the standard model assumptions with one scalar and the perturbativity, or on slight extensions of the standard model assumptions. These analyzes manifest that the results when only three families are included are in better agreement with the experimental data than those, which include also the fourth family.