ADELIC VERSION of MARGULIS ARITHMETICITY THEOREM Hee Oh 1. Introduction Let R Denote the Set of All Prime Numbers Including

ADELIC VERSION of MARGULIS ARITHMETICITY THEOREM Hee Oh 1. Introduction Let R Denote the Set of All Prime Numbers Including

ADELIC VERSION OF MARGULIS ARITHMETICITY THEOREM Hee Oh Abstract. In this paper, we generalize Margulis’s S-arithmeticity theorem to the case when S can be taken as an infinite set of primes. Let R be the set of all primes including infinite one ∞ and set Q∞ = R. Let S be any subset of R. For each p ∈ S, let Gp be a connected semisimple adjoint Qp-group without any Qp-anisotropic factors and Dp ⊂ Gp(Qp) be a compact open subgroup for almost all finite prime p ∈ S. Let (GS , Dp) denote the restricted topological product of Gp(Qp)’s, p ∈ S with respect to Dp’s. Note that if S is finite, (GS , Dp) = Qp∈S Gp(Qp). We show that if Pp∈S rank Qp (Gp) ≥ 2, any irreducible lattice in (GS , Dp) is a rational lattice. We also present a criterion on the collections Gp and Dp for (GS , Dp) to admit an irreducible lattice. In addition, we describe discrete subgroups of (GA, Dp) generated by lattices in a pair of opposite horospherical subgroups. 1. Introduction Let R denote the set of all prime numbers including the infinite prime ∞ and Rf the set of finite prime numbers, i.e., Rf = R−{∞}. We set Q∞ = R. For each p ∈ R, let Gp be a non-trivial connected semisimple algebraic Qp-group and for each p ∈ Rf , let Dp be a compact open subgroup of Gp(Qp). The adele group of Gp, p ∈ R with respect to Dp, p ∈ Rf is defined to be the restricted topological product of the groups Gp(Qp) with respect to the distinguished subgroups Dp. We denote this group by (GA, {Dp, p ∈ Rf }) or simply by (GA, Dp). That is, (GA, Dp) = {(gp) ∈ Gp(Qp) | gp ∈ Dp for almost all p ∈ Rf }. pY∈R As is well known, the adele group (GA, Dp) is a locally compact topological group. If G is a connected semisimple Q-group, then we mean by (GA, G(Zp)) the adele group attached to the groups Gp = G, p ∈ R with respect to the subgroups G(Zp), p ∈ Rf . It is a well known result of Borel [Bo1] that the diagonal embedding of G(Q) into (GA, G(Zp)), which we will identify with G(Q), is a lattice in (GA, G(Zp)). Furthermore 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification number: 20G35, 22E40, 22E46, 22E50, 22E55 1 2 HEE OH Godement’s criterion in an adelic setting, proved by Mostow and Tamagawa [MT] and also independently by Borel [Bo1], implies that G is Q-isotropic if and only if G(Q) is a non-uniform lattice in (GA, G(Zp)). In the spirit of Margulis arithmeticity theorem [Ma1], we show in this paper that any irreducible lattice in an adele group (GA, Dp) is essentially of the form described as above. We say that a lattice Γ in (GA, Dp) is irreducible if, for any finite subset S of R containing ∞, πS (Γ ∩{(gp) ∈ GA | gp ∈ Dp for all p∈ / S}) is an irreducible lattice in p∈S Gp(Qp) in the usual sense (see [Ma2, Ch III, 5.9] or definition 2.9 below) where Q πS denotes the natural projection (GA, Dp) → p∈S Gp(Qp). The following is a sample case of our main theorem:Q 1.1. Theorem. For each p ∈ R, let Gp be a connected semisimple adjoint Qp-group without any Qp-anisotropic factors and Dp a compact open subgroup for almost all p ∈ Rf . Assume that G∞ is absolutely simple. Then any irreducible non-uniform lattice Γ in (GA, Dp) is rational in the sense that there exist a connected absolutely simple Q-isotropic Q-group H and a Qp-isomorphism fp : H → Gp for each p ∈ R with fp(H(Zp)) = Dp for almost all p ∈ Rf such that Γ is a subgroup of finite index in f(H(Q)) where f is the restriction of the product map p∈R fp to (HA,H(Zp)). In particular, f provides a topological group isomorphism of (QHA,H(Zp)) to (GA, Dp). In order to define a rational lattice in an adele group in generality, we first de- scribe arithmetic methods of constructing irreducible lattices in adele groups. Let K be a number field. Let RK be the set of all (inequivalent) valuations of K. For each v ∈ RK, Kv denotes the local field which is the completion of K with respect to v and for non-archimedean v ∈ RK , Ov denotes the ring of integers of Kv. If H is a connected absolutely simple K-group, it is a well known fact that the set T (H) = {v ∈ RK | H(Kv) is compact} is finite. Let S be a subset of RK − T (H) containing all archimedean valuations in RK − T (H), and let (HS, H(Ov)) denote the restricted topological product of the groups H(Kv), v ∈ S with respect to the subgroups H(Ov). Then the subgroup H(K(S)), when identified with its image under the diagonal embedding into (HS, H(Ov)), is a lattice in (HS, H(Ov)) where K(S) denotes the ring of S-integers in K [Bo1]. The group H being absolutely simple, H(K(S)) is in fact an irreducible lattice in (HS, H(Ov)). Unless mentioned otherwise, throughout the introduction, we let Gp be a connected semisimple adjoint Qp-group for each p ∈ R and Dp a compact open subgroup for each p ∈ Rf . ADELIC VERSION OF MARGULIS ARITHMETICITY THEOREM 3 1.2. Definition. We call an irreducible lattice Γ in (GA, Dp) rational if there exist K, H, S as above and a topological group epimorphism f :(GA, Dp) → (HS, H(Ov)) with compact kernel such that f(Γ) is commensurable with H(K(S)). Remark. i (1) Since S ⊂ RK −T (H), H(Kv) is non-compact for each v ∈ S. If we denote by Gp the maximal connected normal Qp-subgroup of Gp without any Qp-anisotropic i i factors for each p ∈ R and let Dp = Dp ∩ Gp for each p ∈ Rf , then in the above i i definition the quotient (GA, Dp)/kerf is isomorphic to (GA, Dp). In particular, if Gp(Qp) has no compact factors for any p ∈ R, we may assume that f is an isomorphism in Definition 1.2. i i (2) If R0 = {p ∈ R | Gp(Qp) is non-compact}, then (GA, Dp) is naturally identified i with the restricted topological product of the groups Gp(Qp), p ∈ R0 with respect i i i i Q to the subgroups Dp. If R0 is finite, then (GA, Dp) = p∈R0 Gp( p). In this case, the above definition of a rational lattice in (GA, DpQ) coincides with that of i Q an R0-arithmetic (usually referred to as “S-arithmetic”) lattice of p∈R0 Gp( p) given in [Ma2, Ch IX, 1.4]. Q (3) If Γ is an irreducible lattice in (GA, Dp), then pr(Γ) is an irreducible lattice in i i i i (GA, Dp) as well where pr denotes the natural projection (GA, Dp) → (GA, Dp). Then an irreducible lattice Γ in (GA, Dp) is rational if and only if pr(Γ) is a i i rational lattice in (GA, Dp) in the sense of Definition A (or Definition B) in 4.1. The following is a special case of Corollary 4.10 below. 1.3. Main Theorem. If p∈R rank Qp (Gp) ≥ 2, any irreducible lattice in (GA, Dp) is rational. P That the adele group (GA, Dp) contains an irreducible lattice imposes a strong re- striction not only on the family of the ambient groups Gp but also on the family of distinguished subgroups Dp. The following presents a necessary and sufficient condition on those restriction: 1.4. Theorem. For each p ∈ R, assume that Gp(Qp) has no compact factors. The adele group (GA, Dp) admits an irreducible lattice if and only if there exist a connected semisimple Q-simple Q-group H such that Gp is Qp-isomorphic to a connected normal Qp-subgroup of H for each p ∈ R and Dp is a subgroup whose volume is maximum among all compact open subgroups of Gp(Qp) for almost all p ∈ Rf . See Theorem 4.13 below for a more general statement. 4 HEE OH Example. (1) If Gp is Qp-simple and Qp-isotropic for each p ∈ R and (GA, Dp) admits an irreducible lattice, then all Gp’s are typewise homogeneous, that is, their Dynkin types are the same. (2) Let n ≥ 2 and Gp = P GLn for each p ∈ R. Then (GA, Dp) has an irreducible lattice if and only if Dp is conjugate to P GLn(Zp) for almost all p ∈ Rf . For n = 2, for each p ∈ Rf , there are two conjugacy classes of maximal compact open subgroups of P GL2(Qp), represented by P GL2(Zp) and by a b 0 1 L = h ∈ P GL (Z ) , i p pc d 2 p p 0 respectively. Note that in the Bruhat-Tits tree associated to P GL2(Qp), the con- jugacy class of P GL2(Zp) corresponds to the stabilizer of a vertex and the conju- gacy class of Lp corresponds to the stabilizer of the middle point of an edge. If we 2 denote by µp a Haar measure of P GL2(Qp), then µp(Lp) = p+1 µp(P GL2(Zp)) a b because the common subgroup ∈ P GL (Z ) has index p +1 in pc d 2 p P GL2(Zp) while it has index 2 in Lp.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    25 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us