Holocene Glacier Fluctuations in Alaska

Holocene Glacier Fluctuations in Alaska

Quaternary Science Reviews 28 (2009) 2034–2048 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Holocene glacier fluctuations in Alaska David J. Barclay a,*, Gregory C. Wiles b, Parker E. Calkin c a Geology Department, State University of New York College at Cortland, Cortland, NY 13045, USA b Department of Geology, The College of Wooster, Wooster, OH 44691, USA c Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA article info abstract Article history: This review summarizes forefield and lacustrine records of glacier fluctuations in Alaska during the Received 9 May 2008 Holocene. Following retreat from latest Pleistocene advances, valley glaciers with land-based termini Received in revised form were in retracted positions during the early to middle Holocene. Neoglaciation began in some areas by 15 January 2009 4.0 ka and major advances were underway by 3.0 ka, with perhaps two distinct early Neoglacial Accepted 29 January 2009 expansions centered respectively on 3.3–2.9 and 2.2–2.0 ka. Tree-ring cross-dates of glacially killed trees at two termini in southern Alaska show a major advance in the AD 550s–720s. The subsequent Little Ice Age (LIA) expansion was underway in the AD 1180s–1320s and culminated with two advance phases respectively in the 1540s–1710s and in the 1810s–1880s. The LIA advance was the largest Holocene expansion in southern Alaska, although older late Holocene moraines are preserved on many forefields in northern and interior Alaska. Tidewater glaciers around the rim of the Gulf of Alaska have made major advances throughout the Holocene. Expansions were often asynchronous with neighboring termini and spanned both warm and cool intervals, suggesting that non-climatic factors were important in forcing these advances. However, climatic warming appears to have initiated most rapid iceberg-calving retreats. Large glaciers termi- nating on the forelands around the Gulf of Alaska may have had tidewater termini early in the Holocene, but have progressively become isolated from the adjacent ocean by the accumulation and subaerial exposure of their own sediments. Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction done in the past two decades, with glacier histories being recon- structed in new regions and new analytical and dating methods Glacier ice currently covers approximately 74,700 km2 of Alaska being applied to previously studied areas. Furthermore, ongoing (Kaufman and Manley, 2004). These ice fields and glaciers are glacier retreat throughout Alaska and concomitant erosion of distributed among multiple mountain ranges (Fig. 1) with the most forefields is continually providing new exposures of stratigraphy extensive ice complexes being in the south around the margins of and datable materials. Several other reviews (Mann et al., 1998; the Gulf of Alaska. Land-based glaciers in Alaska are sensitive Calkin et al., 2001; Wiles et al., 2008) have synthesized some of indicators of climate and their fluctuations have been used to assess these new data for specific time intervals or regions of Alaska; both contemporary and past climate change (e.g. Wiles et al., 2004, herein we emphasize both a statewide and Holocene-length 2008; Dyurgerov and Meier, 2005; Lemke et al., 2007). Moreover, perspective. volume changes of the ice complexes of southern Alaska have been Following a summary of late Wisconsinan deglaciation, we sufficiently large in recent centuries to affect both eustatic sea level divide the glaciers of Alaska into three groups for review of Holo- (Arendt et al., 2002; Meier et al., 2007) and to locally cause meters cene fluctuations. First, we consider the histories of valley and of glacioisostatic depression and rebound (Motyka, 2003; Larsen cirque glaciers that have been land-based throughout the Holo- et al., 2004; Mann and Streveler, 2008). cene. These termini occur in all major mountain ranges of Alaska The purpose of this paper is to update the review of Holocene and their fluctuations are most directly controlled by climate glaciation of Alaska by Calkin (1988). Considerable work has been change. Secondly, we review the histories of tidewater glaciers in southern Alaska; these large systems have iceberg-calving termini and are significantly affected by non-climatic forcing factors. Lastly, * Corresponding author. Tel.: þ1 607 753 2921; fax: þ1 607 753 2927. we consider the large foreland glaciers of the Chugach and Saint E-mail address: [email protected] (D.J. Barclay). Elias mountains that terminate on the fringe of the Gulf of Alaska, 0277-3791/$ – see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.01.016 D.J. Barclay et al. / Quaternary Science Reviews 28 (2009) 2034–2048 2035 Fig. 1. Shaded relief map showing areas mentioned in text. Dashed lines separate climate regions of Shulski and Wendler (2007). which may have changed from tidewater-calving to land-based continental Interior and Copper River Basin climate region where termini during the Holocene. winter temperatures and precipitation are significantly lower than in areas to the south and west, while the Brooks Range forms the 1.1. Geographic and climatic setting southern boundary of the Arctic climate region (Shulski and Wendler, 2007). Glacier activities reflect these climate zones, with The largest glaciers and ice fields of Alaska are in the south in the mass turnovers and flow rates being greatest in southern Alaska. Kenai, Chugach, Saint Elias and Coast mountains (Fig. 1). Large valley glacier systems also occur in the Alaska Range and Wrangell 1.2. Methods Mountains, whereas smaller glaciers are found in the Brooks and Aleutian ranges, Kigluaik, Ahklun and Talkeetna mountains, and on Most of the studies synthesized here are based on forefield islands rimming the Gulf of Alaska (Molnia, 2007). Peaks in Alaska’s mapping of glacial landforms and stratigraphy. Moraines define the mountain ranges are generally 1000–3000 m above sea level (asl), limits of advances (Fig. 2) and are dated by historical observations, while a few peaks in the Saint Elias, Wrangell and Chugach germination dates of trees, lichenometry, and in a few cases, mountains and Alaska Range reach 4000–6000 m asl. cosmogenic exposure ages and tephra layers (e.g. Bege´t, 1994; This distribution of glaciers reflects the Gulf of Alaska being the Wiles and Calkin, 1994; Evison et al., 1996; Viens, 2005). Calkin and main source of precipitation to the region (Shulski and Wendler, Ellis (1980) and Loso and Doak (2006) discuss the application and 2007). Additional moisture originates from Bristol Bay and the assumptions of lichenometric ages in Alaska, and Solomina and Bering Sea, while low air temperatures and sea ice cover on the Calkin (2003) present five revised lichen growth curves for distinct Chukchi and Beaufort seas limit moisture transport from the north. areas within the state. We use these revised growth equations in Snowlines similarly reflect these moisture sources and rise north- our data compilation and follow Ellis and Calkin (1984) in assuming wards from the south coast; snowlines in the interior and north also an age reliability of Æ20% with lichenometric data. rise eastwards away from the Bering Sea (Pe´we´,1975). Dendrochronologic dates from glacially damaged or killed trees Glaciers on the Gulf of Alaska side of the Kenai, Chugach, Saint (Fig. 3) are our preferred method for constraining late Holocene ice Elias and Coast mountains are in the Southern Coast climate region margin fluctuations in southern Alaska (e.g. Wiles et al., 1999a; (Fig. 1). The adjacent ocean moderates temperatures in all seasons Barclay et al., 2006). Composite tree-ring-width chronologies and annual precipitation is very high, with annual water equivalent composed of multiple overlapping generations of subfossil trees totals exceeding 5 m in some locations (Shulski and Wendler, now extend back almost two millennia (Table 1) and sites such as 2007). The maritime influence is also strong in the West Coast Glacier Bay have the potential to yield chronologies that will span climate region, although the lack of a continuous mountain barrier much of the Holocene (Lawson et al., 2006). Strengths of this reduces the regional orographic influence on precipitation. The method include the annual precision of tree-ring cross-dates and Bristol Bay and Cook Inlet climate region is transitional to the more the ability to derive both germination and kill dates for each log 2036 D.J. Barclay et al. / Quaternary Science Reviews 28 (2009) 2034–2048 Fig. 2. Okpilak Glacier in northeastern Brooks Range. Arrows indicate lateral moraines lichenometrically dated, respectively, to AD 1500 and 1890 (Evison et al., 1996). Fig. 3. Logs in outwash at Tebenkof Glacier. Cutbank is about 3 m high and logs were Moraine in center of valley was at the glacier terminus from 1947 to 1956. Photograph collectively alive from AD 338 to 712. by Nolan (2004). dated that serve as minimum and maximum dates for glacier (Kaufman and Manley, 2004). Most of this ice was in central to advances (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the abundance of cross-datable southern Alaska and on the adjacent continental shelf, where it material in southern Alaska means that tens of logs can be readily formed an inter-connected network of ice caps and piedmont lobes dated for some forefields, allowing ice margin fluctuations to be as a northwestern extension of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet (Hamilton reconstructed in considerable

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    15 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us