Political Culture POLITICAL IDEOLOGY AND POLITICAL CULTURE Political ideology – a system of political ideas, developed for the purposes of political action (governing a country, launching a social movement or a political party, organizing a revolution – or a counterrevolution, etc.) Political culture the broad pattern of political orientations shared by a large group of people (a nation, a region, a class, an ethnic group) Three levels of political culture* System Pride in a nation National identity Legitimacy of government Process Principles of government Role of citizens People’s basic political beliefs Policy Role of government Government policy priorities ------------------------------------------ *See Gabriel Almond, Bingham Powell, Kaare Strom, Russell Dalton, Comparative Politics Today: A World View. 7th edition. New York: Longman, 2000, p.50 National Pride In 2006, University of Chicago researchers asked people in various countries to what extent they agreed with such statements as, “I would rather be a citizen of my country than any other country in the world,” and “Generally speaking, my country is a better country than most countries.” World’s most and least patriotic countries (poll): http://www.forbes.com/2008/07/02/world-national-pride-oped- cx_sp_0701patriot.html Americans expressed the most national pride in five of the domains: democracy, political influence, economic system, science, the military. Venezuelans expressed the most pride in four categories: sports, the arts, history treatment of groups. WHAT THINGS DO YOU VALUE MOST ABOUT BEING CANADIAN? Freedom/choices: 59% Beauty/geography/climate/resources: 23% Health care/medical system: 20% Quality of life: 18% Opportunities/economic stability: 12% Peaceful/no war: 10% Multiculturalism/tolerance: 10% Democratic country: 8% People friendly/polite/kind: 8% Safety/low crime rate: 7% Social programs: 7% International reputation: 7% Good country (general): 6% Education system: 6% Clean: 3% Born here/identity: 3% Bilingual: 2% Negative comments: 2% (Environics poll, 1997) Flag, Forces and hockey make Canadians proud: http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=08a a6f89-f7f5-4b0c-939b-28e24bd54f2f Canadians and Americans differ on political correctness: http://www.angus- reid.com/polls/38540/canadians_americans_differ_on_politi cal_correctness/ Canadian values (as described by the Canadian Commission for UNESCO)*: the promotion of culture and democracy through the sharing of ideas and knowledge; justice and equality for all; freedom of thought, expression and communication; the promotion of tolerance; access to education and information; the affirmation of specific cultures and identities as integral parts of the richness of humanity; a respect for indigenous cultures; and the preservation of the world's heritage and natural environment. ----------------------------------- *A Code of Ethics/Values for Countries, Governments, Businesses. - http://www.peace.ca/codeofethics.htm National pride does not come from affluence What matters is a sense of history – every generation has its own readings of it – and its own historical myths Patriotism is a double-edged sword (“the last refuge of a scoundrel” – Samuel Johnson) National identity – a sense of a nation’s (ethnic group’s) uniqueness, particular qualities, place in the world, role in history Also a double-edged sword: “us vs. them” Legitimacy of government defines fundamental understanding between citizens and authorities High legitimacy makes society easier to govern, reduces conflicts in society Low legitimacy has opposite effects The Process Level Principles of government Major global question of the 20th century: democracy or authoritarianism? Solved in favour of democracy The next major global question: how to make democracy work? Role of citizens 3 types of citizen role, 3 types of political culture: participants – informed about politics, make political demands, expect politicians to deliver public goods subjects – passively obey the government and laws parochials* – are barely aware that the state exists ----------- *From “parish” – local church community Industrial democracies are generally characterized by the dominance of the participant orientation, although both subjects and parochials are present, too. In a preindustrial democracy (example – India), even though democratic institutions are present, most citizens behave as subjects or parochials In communist countries (authoritarian industrial), the level of political participation is usually high, but the vast majority of citizens act as subjects – in the absence of real political freedoms. Few citizens are allowed to be parochial: the state draws people into politics. In some democracies, too, voting is obligatory The concept of civic culture (Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba, 1958): democracy is stable when there is a mix of participant, subject and parochial cultures That is: too much participation exacerbates conflicts in society People should be free to opt out of political life The policy level The policy level of a political culture describes public attitudes to the role and functions of government These attitudes differ from country to country: %% agreeing that the government should ensure everyone is provided for*: 60-70% range: Chile, Latvia, Nigeria 50-60% range: Hungary, Turkey, Spain, Lithuania 40-50% range: Italy, Poland, Britain, Russia, Mexico, China 30-40% range: Argentina, Netherlands 20-30% range: South Korea, Germany, Canada, France Below 20%: USA --------------------------------------- See Gabriel Almond et al., Op.cit., p.54 Conflict and consensus Some political cultures are conflictual (more prone to conflict) Others, consensual (characterized by high levels of consensus in society about basic political values and principles) Existence of consensus does not mean absence of conflict: one can have consensus (rules) as to how to wage and manage conflicts Subcultures Within national political cultures, there are subcultures, characterizing political attitudes of different groups within society. In conflictual cultures, there are deep rifts between subcultures The rifts are caused by such factors as: Class Ethnicity or race Religion Regional differences Civilizations “Civilization” in the singular: French 18th-century usage: “civilization” as opposed to “barbarism”. Connotes “modern society” In the broadest terms, “the human civilization” as a product of development of the human species – there may exist other civilizations on other planets “Civilizations” in the plural: The largest, longest-living, transnational cultural entities which have emerged at different stages of history in different parts of the world Samuel Huntington: “A civilization is the broadest cultural entity. Villages, regions, ethnic groups, nationalities, religious groups all have distinct cultures at different levels of cultural heterogeneity. The culture of a village in southern Italy may be different from that of a village in northern Italy, but both will share in a common Italian culture that distinguishes them from German villages. European communities, in turn, will share cultural features that distinguish them from Chinese or Hindu communities. Chinese, Hindus, and Westerners, however, are not part of any broader cultural entity. They constitute civilizations… A civilization thus is the highest cultural grouping of people and the broadest level of cultural identity people have short of that which distinguishes humans from other species. It is defined both by common objective elements, such as language, history, religion, customs, institutions, and by the subjective self-identification of people. People have levels of identity: a resident of Rome may define himself with varying degrees of intensity as a Roman, an Italian, a Catholic, a Christian, A European, a Westerner. The civilization to which he belongs is the broadest level of identification with which he strongly identifies. Civilizations are the biggest “we” within which we feel culturally at home as distinguished from all the other “thems” out there.”* ------------------------------ *Samuel Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Touchstone Books, 1997, p.43 “A civilization… is neither a given economy nor a given society, but something which can persist through a series of economies and societies, barely susceptible to gradual change. A civilization can be approached, therefore, only in the long term, taking hold of a constantly unwinding thread – something that a group of people have conserved and passed on as their most precious heritage from generation to generation, throughout and despite the storms and tumults of history.” Fernand Braudel, A History of Civilizations, translated by Richard Mayne. Pengui Books, 1993, p.35 Civilizations emerge in the course of history under the combined impact of various factors:* Geographic – different types of interactions between man and the natural environment Sociological – different types of societies (rural or urban, degrees of inequality, etc.) Economic – what technologies are used, how productive is human labour, how wealth is distributed, etc. Mental – different ways of thought and belief *See Braudel, pp.9-23 Braudel again: “In every period, a certain view of the world, a collective mentality, dominates the whole mass of society. Dictating a society’s attitudes, guiding its choices, confirming its prejudices and directing its actions, this is very much a fact of civilization.