Conservation of Priority Birds in Sagebrush Ecosystems1

Conservation of Priority Birds in Sagebrush Ecosystems1

Conservation of Priority Birds in Sagebrush Ecosystems1 Terrell D. Rich,2 Michael J. Wisdom,3 and Victoria A. Saab4 ________________________________________ Abstract Sagebrush ecosystems occupy over 62,000,000 ha of habitat. Estimated current population sizes are, not the western US. However, they have been degraded or surprisingly, drastically reduced from historic numbers. completely eliminated by agricultural conversion, over- The Western Meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta) showed grazing by domestic livestock, invasion of exotic the least percent reduction and Grasshopper Sparrow plants, expansion of pinyon and juniper woodlands, un- the most. For six species that had significant or near characteristic wildfires, and fragmentation. This habitat significant declines in the Columbia Plateau since 1966 loss has led to an increasing number of special status and for which we had historic and current habitat species, including 630 plant and animal species of con- estimates, the estimated historical declines were all servation concern. In this paper, we focus on the 22 remarkably similar to recent trends. Trends and man- taxa of sagebrush associated birds that are priorities in agement activities on public lands in Idaho, Oregon, Partners in Flight Bird Conservation Plans. These and Washington that may be contributing to dispro- range from sagebrush obligates–Greater Sage-grouse portionate declines in priority birds include an increase (Centrocercus urophasianus), Gunnison Sage-grouse in the area burned annually by wildfire, an increase in (C. minimus), Sage Thrasher (Oreoscoptes montanus), the biomass of grazing cattle, and continued fencing Sage Sparrow (Amphispiza belli), Brewer’s Sparrow and water development that spread negative impacts (Spizella breweri)–to grassland associates such as over an ever greater portion of the landscape. We Short-eared Owl (Asio flammeus) and Vesper Sparrow suggest that conservation of sage-grouse populations in (Pooecetes gramineus). Partners in Flight has identified reasonable numbers well distributed across their five of these species for the continental Watch List– historical ranges also will provide substantial benefits Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni), both sage-grouse, for many, or even most, other bird species that co- the Short-eared Owl, and Brewer’s Sparrow–which occur with these grouse. Given that more than 57 places them among the highest priority species for con- percent of this habitat is in public ownership and that servation action in North America. We also examine concern for the future of sage-grouse continues to the extent to which sage grouse may serve as classic build, we have all the information and opportunity we umbrella species for shrubsteppe avifauna. These spe- need to take action. Indeed, if we cannot successfully cies tended to occur together–83 pairwise correlations conserve sage-grouse and the sagebrush ecosystem in of relative abundance were significant (8.55 expected). the US given our theory, our knowledge, and our large Factor analysis of these data showed that species blocks of public land, then one wonders how we can formed groups based on habitat associations much as succeed for other species elsewhere. expected, although sage-grouse aligned more closely with the Vesper Sparrow than expected. Population trends for three major physiographic strata that encom- pass sagebrush ecosystems–the Columbia Plateau, Key words: Artemisia, Columbia Plateau, conservation plans, Great Basin, Greater Sage-grouse, landbirds, Wyoming Basin, and Basin and Range–showed the Columbia Plateau to have many more declining popul- Partners in Flight, population trends, public land, ation trends. Habitat associations for declining species sagebrush. included both sagebrush and grassland types. Historic (1850) and current population sizes were estimated for 12 priority taxa in the Interior Columbia Basin based on predicted areas of historic and current source Introduction __________ In this paper, we summarize species assessments 1A version of this paper was presented at the Third Interna- (Carter et al. 2000) and conservation planning for tional Partners in Flight Conference, March 20-24, 2002, priority birds of sagebrush ecosystems, particularly Asilomar Conference Grounds, California. from Partners in Flight (Bonny et al. 2000, Rich et al. 2U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, ID 83709. E-mail: [email protected]. 2004) and the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem 3U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 1401 Management Project (Wisdom et al. 2000). We also Gekeler Lane, La Grande, OR, 97850. present some new analyses on population trends, habi- 4U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, tat trends, and the concept of using Greater Sage- Bozeman, MT 59717. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-191. 2005 589 Conservation of Sagebrush Birds – Rich et al. grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) and Gunnison Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius ludovicianus)–have be- Sage-grouse (C. minimus) as umbrella species (Caro come of great concern to various coalitions of conser- and O’Doherty 1999) for the sagebrush avifauna. We vation activists. Partners in Flight (PIF) identified five conclude by suggesting that, because much of the sage- species for the continental Watch List (Rich et al. brush ecosystem still exists in very large blocks and is 2004)–Swainson’s Hawk (Buteo swainsoni), both sage managed by public land agencies, notably the U.S. grouse, the Short-eared Owl (Asio flammeus) and Bureau of Land Management, and because a substan- Brewer’s Sparrow (Spizella breweri)–which places tial amount of planning has already been done using them among the highest priority species for con- the best available science, we have an excellent oppor- servation action in North America. Rich et al. (2004) tunity to implement true multi-species, ecosystem man- also identified six additional Stewardship Species– agement (Odam and Wiens 2002, Groves 2003) to Gray Flycatcher (Empidonax wrightii), Sage Thrasher protect and restore portions of this ecosystem and its (Oreoscoptes montanus), Green-tailed Towhee (Pipilo avifauna. chlorurus), Black-throated Sparrow (Amphispiza bili- neata), Sage Sparrow (A. belli), and Grasshopper Spar- Sagebrush ecosystems, dominated by various species row (Ammodramus savannarum). Stewardship Species of woody Artemisia, occupy over 62,000,000 ha of the have a high percentage of their entire global population western US (Küchler 1970, West and Young 2000). within a relatively limited geographic area. Manage- Losses from the historical extent of these ecosystems ment entities are encouraged to particularly consider have been substantial (Tisdale and Hironaka 1981, needs of these species in land use planning and con- Miller and Eddleman 2000, Knick et al. 2003). For ex- servation action. ample, Hann et al. (1997) estimated that over 30 percent of the sagebrush vegetation in the Interior Management recommendations for birds of sagebrush Columbia Basin has been converted to agriculture, ecosystems can be found in a variety of recent publica- dominated by exotic invasive plants or otherwise lost. tions (Dobkin 1995; Paige and Ritter 1998; Bureau of West-wide, sagebrush has been degraded or completely Land Management 2000; Connelly et al. 2000; eliminated by agricultural conversion (Hann et al. Wisdom et al. 2002a, 2002b; Knick et al. 2003). Rich 1997), overgrazing by domestic livestock (Vale 1975, et al. (2004) provide continental population estimates Fleischner 1994, Young 1994, Donahue 1999, West and objectives for PIF Watch List and Stewardship and Young 2000), invasion of exotic plants (Mack Species while PIF Bird Conservation Plans for the 1981, Yensen 1981, Wisdom et al. 2000), expansion of western states provide detailed management recom- pinyon and juniper woodlands (Miller and Rose 1999), mendations at the state level (Neel 1999, Altman and uncharacteristic wild fires (Pellant 1990, Whisenant Holmes 2000, Beidleman 2000, Casey 2000, Ritter 1990, Johansen et al. 1993) and fragmentation (Knick 2000, Cerovski et al. 2001). Underlying these and Rotenberry 1995, Hann et al. 1997, Wisdom et al. conservation-oriented accounts is a substantial theoreti- 2000). cal base on sagebrush bird populations and ecology (e.g., Rotenberry and Wiens 1980, 1989, 1991; Wiens This habitat loss has led to an increasing number of and Rotenberry 1981, 1985). special status species. Rich (unpubl.) compiled a list of 630 plant and animal species of conservation concern In this paper, we focus on the 22 taxa of sagebrush that depend on sagebrush ecosystems. These include associated birds (table 1) identified by Paige and Ritter species identified by the U.S. Bureau of Land Manage- (1998). These range from sagebrush obligates–Greater ment, Partners in Flight (Paige and Ritter 1999), the Sage-grouse, Gunnison Sage-grouse, Sage Thrasher, Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Pro- Sage Sparrow, Brewer’s Sparrow–whose historical ject (Saab and Rich 1997, Wisdom et al. 2000), the ranges were closely tied to the distribution of woody Nature Conservancy (Nachlinger et al. 2001) and De- Artemisia, to species more typically associated with fenders of Wildlife (Defenders of Wildlife 1998). grasslands and whose historical ranges are very broad in North America, such as the Short-eared Owl and Concern over the status of sagebrush bird communities Vesper Sparrow (Pooecetes gramineus). Grassland as the result of multiple impacts was first recognized species are of interest

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    18 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us