Mutual Mate Choice Can Drive Costly Signaling Even Under Perfect Monogamy: Online Appendix Paul L. Hooper, Geoffrey F. Miller Appendix Table 1. Species exhibiting 2. evidence for male choosiness or female ornamen- mutual mate choice or positive tation/display in non-role-reversed species; assortment by quality-related traits. 3. evidence for female choosiness or male ornamen- tation/display in role-reversed species; or Criteria for inclusion: 4. mutual ornamentation/display plausibly related to advertising individual quality. 1. non-random mating according to traits plausibly related to individual quality; This listing extends Table 2 in the published text. Spiders, Insects, and Crustaceans Species Relevant mating pattern Source Amphipoda Gammarus pulex Size assortative mating (Arnqvist, Rowe, Krupa, & Sih, and G. aquicauda, and other 1996; Hume, Elwood, Dick, & water striders Connaghan, 2002; Thomas, Liautard, Cezilly, & Renaud, 1998) Blister beetles Lytta magister and Size assortative mating (Bonduriansky, 2001; Brown, Tegrodera aloga, the leaf beetle 1990a, 1990b, 1993) Trirhabda canadensis, Brentis anchorago Chrysomelid beetle Timarcha Assortative mating by size and (Thomas, Oget, Gente, Desmots, maritima parasite load & Renaud, 1999) East African jumping spider Mutual display and mutual size (Cross, Jackson, & Pollard, 2007) Evarcha culicivora preferences Fruit fly Drosophila mela- Male preferences for larger, more (Byrne & Rice, 2006) nogaster fecund females Fruit fly Drosophila serrata Mutual expression and preferences (Chenoweth & Blows, 2005) for cuticular hydrocarbon signal traits Correspondence to: P. L. Hooper, Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, MSC01 1040, University of New Mexico, Copyright © 2008 International Society for Adaptive Behavior Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. E-mail: [email protected] (2008), Vol 16(1): 1–9. Tel.: +1 505 850 2869; Fax: +1 505 277 0874 DOI: 10.1177/1059712307087284 1 2 Adaptive Behavior 16(1) Spiders, Insects, and Crustaceans (Continued) Species Relevant mating pattern Source Jumping spider Phidippus clarus Size assortative mating; male pref- (Hoefler, 2007) erences for large females Species in the taxa Diptera (3), Mutual size preferences (Bonduriansky, 2001) Hemiptera (4), and Pieridae (2) Reptiles and Amphibians Species Relevant mating pattern Source Salamander Desmognathus Male preference for large females (Verrell, 1995) santeetlah Sand lizard Lacerta agilis Size assortative mating (Olsson, 1993) Striped plateau lizard Sceloporus Females display orange throat (Weiss, 2006) virgatus patches which predict condition, mite load, body size, and egg mass Fish Species Relevant mating pattern Source Cichlid fish Astatotilapia Male preferences for larger, more (Werner & Lotem, 2006) flaviijosephi fecund females Cichlid fish Eretmodus Size assortative mating; larger (Morley & Balshine, 2003) cyanostictus females more fecund Deep-snouted pipefish Ornament display by both sexes; (Berglund, Widemo, & Syngnathus typhle (sex role female preferences for male size Rosenqvist, 2005; Sandvik, reversed) and brood patch thickness; greater Rosenqvist, & Berglund, 2000) offspring success where mate choice is allowed Pacific blue-eye Pseudomugil Male preference for large females (Wong, Jennions, & Keogh, 2004) signifer Peacock blenny Salaria pavo Female preference for large males (Fagundes, Gonçalves, & (sex role reversed) with larger head crests Oliveira, 2007) Redlip blenny Mutual size preferences (Cote & Hunte, 1989) Three-spined stickleback More attractive males choose larger (Kraak & Bakker, 1998) Gasterosteus aculeatus females Trinidadian guppy Poecilia Male preference for large females (Herdman, Kelly, & Godin, 2004; reticulata Ojanguren & Magurran, 2004) Two-spotted goby Gobiusculus Male preference for large, brightly (Amundsen & Forsgren, 2003; flavescens colored females; larger males pair Pelabon et al., 2003) with brighter females Hooper & Miller Costly Signaling Under Monogamy: Online Appendix 3 Birds Species Relevant mating pattern Source Alpine accentor Prunella collaris Female song displays (Langmore, Davies, Hatchwell, & Hartley, 1996) American goldfinch Carduelis Assortative mating by yellow plum- (MacDougall & Montgomerie, tristis age 2003) American kestrel Falco Assortative mating by size and condi- (Bortolotti & Iko, 1992) sparverius tion Barn owl Tyto alba Female plumage spottiness and male (Roulin, Richner, & Ducrest, plumage coloration associated with 1998) parasite resistance and other aspects of condition Barn swallow Hirundo rustica Male preference for female tail (Møller, 1993) length, associated with clutch success Bearded tit Panurus biarmicus Mutual (but dimorphic) preferences (Romero-Pujante, Hoi, for tail length Blomqvist, & Valera, 2002) Black grouse Tetrao tetrix Positive relationship between female (Rintamaki, Lundberg, Alatalo, condition and male rank; couples & Hoglund, 1998) highest in these two had greatest clutch success Black swan Cygnus atratus Mutual curled wing feather (Kraaijeveld, Gregurke, Hall, ornaments Komdeur, & Mulder, 2004) Blue tit Parus caeruleus Mutual crown ornaments and male (Andersson, Ornborg, & Anders- preference for ultraviolet head son, 1998) coloration Blue-footed booby Sula nebouxii Male preference for female foot (Torres & Velando, 2005) color, mutual foot display Bluethroat Luscinia svecica Male preference for female throat (Amundsen, Forsgren, & color, associated with condition Hansen, 1997) Burrowing parrot Cyanoliseus Assortative mating by physical (Masello, Pagnossin, Lubjuhn, patagonus condition and red abdominal & Quillfeldt, 2004; Masello & plumage; plumage color predicts Quillfeldt, 2003) male size and female condition Carolina wren Thryothorus Assortative mating by wing length (Haggerty, 2006) ludovicianus Common eider Somateria Female white wing plumage (Hanssen, Folstad, & Erikstad, mollissima correlated with body mass and 2006) immune competence 4 Adaptive Behavior 16(1) Birds (Continued) Species Relevant mating pattern Source Common goldeneye Bucephala Female wing plumage associated (Ruusila, Poysa, & Runko, clangula with hatching date and reproductive 2001) success Common tern Sterna hirunda Assortative mating by bill size (Coulter, 1986) Crested auklet Aesthia cristatella Mutual display of crest ornaments (Jones & Hunter, 1993, 1999) Dark-eyed junco Junco hyemalis Mutual conspicuous white tail (Wolf, Casto, Nolan, & plumage Ketterson, 2004) Eastern bluebird Siala sialis UV and melanin-based plumage (Siefferman & Hill, 2005) associated with condition and repro- ductive success in both sexes European shag Phalacrocorax Assortative mating by crest size, which (Daunt, Monaghan, Wanless, & aristotelis predicts condition and clutch success Harris, 2003) European starling Sturnus Mutual iridescent throat plumage (Komdeur, Oorebeek, vulgaris van Overveld, & Cuthill, 2005) Fowl Gallus gallus More ornamented females have better (Cornwallis & Birkhead, 2007) condition and are preferred by males, especially high ranking males Gouldian finch Erythrura goul- Assortative pairing by head color; head (Pryke & Griffith, 2007) diae color discrimination by both sexes House finch Carpadacus mexica- Male preference for plumage color (Hill, 1993) nus House sparrow Passer domesti- Assortative mating by tail length and (Moreno-Rueda, 2006) cus body size Inca tern Larosterna Monomorphic white feather mous- (Velando, Lessells, & Marquez, taches associated with condition; 2001) fleshy yellow wattles King penguin Aptenodytes pat- Mutual plumage ornaments, corre- (Viera, Nolan, Côté, Jouventin, agonicus lated with territorial success & Groscolas, in press) Moorhen Gallinula chloropus Mutual frontal shields, correlation (Eens, Van Duyse, Berghman, & between male and female condition Pinxten, 2000; Petrie, 1983) Northern cardinal Cardinalis Male preference for female underwing (Jawor, Linville, Beall, & cardinalis color, associated with care ability Breitwisch, 2003; Linville, Breitwisch, & Schilling, 1998) North American barn swallow Assortative mating by ventral plum- (Safran & McGraw, 2004) Hirundo rustica erythrogaster age coloration; plumage predicts annual reproductive success Hooper & Miller Costly Signaling Under Monogamy: Online Appendix 5 Birds (Continued) Species Relevant mating pattern Source Pied flycatcher Ficedula Assortative mating by white forehead (Morales et al., 2007; Potti hypoleuca patch size, associated with low para- & Merino, 1996) site load and number of surviving offspring in females Pinyon jay Gymnorhinus Female head coloration reflects dom- (Johnson, 1988) cyanocephalus inance in competition for access to males Red grouse Lagopus lagopus UV-reflecting combs in both sexes; (Mougeot, Redpath, & Leckie, scoticus brighter UV associated with fewer 2005) parasites in both sexes Red-tailed tropicbird Phaethon Exaggerated tail streamers, mutual (Boland, Double, & Baker, rubricauda preferences for streamer length 2004) Rock sparrow Petronia petronia Assortative mating by yellow (Griggio, Valera, Casas, & breast ornament, correlated with Pilastro, 2005; Pilastro, Griggio, body mass and fecundity in & Matessi, 2003) females Spotless starling Sturnus uni- Females display by carrying feath- (Polo & Veiga, 2006) color ers, behavior that correlates with condition; males display by carrying green plants Yellow-eyed penguin Assortative mating by carotenoid eye (Massaro, Davis, & Darby, Megadyptes antipodes coloration and plumage 2003) Zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata Male condition-related preferences; (Burley & Coopersmith,