Several questions at [email protected] were about hell. Will the wicked suffer forever in torments of flame? Will they be there as long as we are in heaven? What about people who don't know about Jesus? There were perhaps ten variations on this theme. I have been hesitant to answer these questions because I am in the middle of a major study on this myself. If you will offer me permission to "think aloud" on this difficult topic and be kind to offer me grace if I am wrong, I will go ahead and begin to answer. It may take several columns to deal with the issues involved. Full disclosure: I believe there are elements of ego and wish fulfillment that hover around any theological discussion. I want to be upfront about my own issues here. I was raised in the far right of the Church of Christ. All people who didn't follow our system were, I was assured, bound for eternity in flames. A million million years in torment, they would be no closer to the end of their suffering than they were on the day they died. This hell-bound group included more than the obvious candidates (smokers, drinkers, dancers, atheists, card players, Hitler). It also consisted of any person who went to any other church than our particular branch of the CoC. I didn't want that to be true. I agonized even as a young child about how God could burn people forever and yet say "God is love." I bring this up because, as I paw through this pile of books on my desk this cold, snowy morning, I want to be open and say that my desire to find an alternative view might be impacting me in subconscious ways. I first found an alternative theory when I read Edward Fudge's book "The Fire That Consumes." To have a fellow CoC member -- an elder, no less -- tell me that our traditional teaching wasn't scriptural was a wonderful relief. His book is not an easy read because he is so careful, so studious, and so determined to footnote and backtrack every point that you might need to back up and read something three times for it to sink in. It was -- and is -- well worth the effort required. Then I came across a survey of Bible translations and texts by Gary Amirault. He wrote an article entitled "Hell is Leaving the Bible 'Forever'" where he tracks how scholarship is opening up the original teaching in Scripture. The KJV uses the word 54 total times while the New KJV only uses the word 32 times. The American Standard Version of 1901 (that was the favored version of my branch of the CoC) uses it a mere 13 times, all in the New Testament. The NIV uses it 14 times. Once you leave these more mainstream versions and get into literal translations we find that "hell" disappears. Even Greek-English parallel versions such as Zondervan's Parallel NT in Greek and English and The NASB-NIV Parallel in Greek and English do not have the word "hell" even once. The closer we get to the Greek and Hebrew, the fewer times the word "hell" shows up. Not only is "hell" disappearing as we get more exact in our translations, the word "forever" is also changing radically and, in some instances, disappearing. Dr. G. Campbell Morgan (known as the prince of expositors) wrote "Let me say to Bible students that we must be very careful how to use the word 'eternity.' We have fallen into great error in our constant use of that word. There is NO word in the whole Book of God corresponding with our 'eternal', which as commonly used among us, means absolutely without end." ["God's Method With Men"] We normally run to passages that say "forever", "eternal", or "without end" when we describe the torments of hell. Is that fair? Is that Biblical or is it merely traditional, perhaps based on the translation and interpretation work of long dead scholars who are beyond our ability to cross examine? Look at these examples of how God uses these same words and see if we aren't working from two different sets of dictionaries. Sodom's fiery judgment is eternal (Jude 7) -- until -- God "will restore the fortunes of Sodom." (Ezekiel 16:53-55) Ammon is to become a wasteland "forever" and "rise no more" (Zeph.2:9; Jeremiah 25:27) -- until -- the Lord will "restore the fortunes of the Ammonites." (Jer. 49:6) An Ammonite or Moabite is forbidden to enter the Lord's congregation "forever" -- until -- the tenth generation (Deut.23:3). Habbakuk tells us of mountains that were "everlasting" -- until -- they were shattered (Hab.3:6). The Aaronic priesthood was to be an "everlasting" priesthood (Ex.40:15) -- until -- the Melchizedek priesthood superceded it (Heb.7:14-18). Many translations tell us that God would dwell in Solomon's temple "forever" (1 Kings 8:13) -- until -- it was destroyed. The Law of Moses was was an "everlasting covenant" (Lev.24:8) yet the New Testament tells us that the first was "done away" and "abolished" (2 Cor. 3:11,13) as God "made the first old." (Heb.8:13) God's wrath rolled over Jonah "forever" -- until -- the Lord delivered him from the belly of the fish on the third day. NOTE: forever lasted three days. Hmmm. A bondservant was to serve his master "forever" -- which meant until he ceased to "be", i.e. died. (Exodus 21:6) There are literally dozens more of these examples. Our word "eternal" just isn't the right word to use in most of these places. There is also that problematical saying of Jesus in Luke 12:47,48. He says that those who know the Father's and refuse to obey will be beaten with many stripes but those who disobey out of ignorance will receive "few stripes." Punishment isn't a "one size fits all" affair. In the last few years, when people ask me if hell is eternal, I have tended to reply "Yes, but those who are lost aren't." Whether they are destroyed or whether they are purified, I now believe that they do not inhabit a place of eternal torment forever... at least in the sense we usually mean when we say "eternal." Does hell last forever? It seems so. Do those who enter hell stay there forever? Not if we use the same kind of language in the same way that the writers of Scripture used it. It seems clear that "forever" meant, as one commenter stated, "until God's purpose has been fulfilled." Certainly, scripture uses a much more elastic definition of “forever” and “eternal” than we use. Then, some will counter, how long will we stay in heaven since God uses the same term for souls in glory as He does for souls in punishment? Again, referring back to a word in English to make your point is a reasoning error -- a common one and one I've made countless times, myself. If we understand "forever" to mean "until God's purpose has been fulfilled" then we have no problem here: we know that those in hell will be punished until God is done doing so and those in heaven will stay with God until He wants them elsewhere. I’m good with that. A God of love isn’t going to kick us out as if we were guests who stayed too long. And another thing… There are twelve gates to the city, we are told. Do you believe in a literal gate? Do you think God imported pearls and gold into heaven? Was God being descriptive or was God using symbols that we could understand? When I read John's descriptions of all the precious gems and stones used in heaven's construction I do not think that God used atoms and molecules and geology to make our new home; I think he is trying to tell us that it is beautiful, awe inspiring, and you should change your life so that you can get there. After we are there, God has every right to assign us some work to do, in or out of that city. We don't know what that work might be but, IF there is work for us to do, I am certain we will be thrilled to do it. Interesting, isn't it, that some who saw "beyond the curtain" were told that they could not speak of what they saw? Paul said it wasn't lawful to speak of the things he saw. John the Revelator said he saw some things but was told not to write about them. Can we admit that there isn't a whole lot that we KNOW about the afterlife? We have some warnings and some wonderful promises. That is supposed to be enough to help us walk in faith. I am comfortable with the mystery. But some still worry… “If souls will not be in torment as long as we are in heaven, then what happens to them?” There are a few ideas here, all with some scriptural support. One view is that all will eventually be saved. Those who knew God and left Him might spend a lot longer in hell than those who didn't even hear the name of God during their lives, but after they are cleansed, they will be brought into heaven. This teaching is usually called "universalism” and there are many versions of it.
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages28 Page
-
File Size-