The Seed Bank of Hemlock Forests: Implications for Forest Regeneration Following Hemlock Decline1 Kelley A

The Seed Bank of Hemlock Forests: Implications for Forest Regeneration Following Hemlock Decline1 Kelley A

Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 133(3), 2006, pp. 393–402 The seed bank of hemlock forests: implications for forest regeneration following hemlock decline1 Kelley A. Sullivan2 and Aaron M. Ellison3 Harvard University, Harvard Forest, 324 North Main Street, Petersham, MA 01366, USA K. A. SULLIVAN AND A. M. ELLISON (Harvard Forest, 324 North Main Street, Petersham, MA 01366, USA). The seed bank of hemlock forests: implications for forest regeneration following hemlock decline. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 133:393–402. 2006.—Soil seed banks are especially important for forest regeneration in stands with few understory species and individuals. The understory of hemlock (Tsuga canadensis)- dominated stands in New England primarily consists of hemlock seedlings and saplings, but all size classes of hemlock are attacked by the hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae). Prior to the initiation of a large-scale manipulative experiment designed to examine the impact of the adelgid on hemlock forest ecology, we documented the seed bank composition of eight large (0.81 ha) experimental hemlock-dominated and young hardwood-dominated plots. The seed bank samples from the hemlock-dominated plots contained significantly fewer species (rarefied species richness 5 24; 95% confidence interval 5 20–28) than those from the hardwood-dominated plots (species richness 5 30). Seed banks from all plots were dominated by Betula lenta, Rubus spp., and Carex pensylvanica. Among plots, there was little compositional relationship between the forest overstory and its understory on the one hand, and its seed bank on the other hand. Because seeds of hemlock and birch persist for only a few years in the seed bank, and because hemlock seedlings are readily attacked and killed by the adelgid, damaged hemlock stands are more likely to be replaced by stands of black birch and other hardwoods than by hemlock. Key words: Betula, birch, hemlock, hemlock woolly adelgid, regeneration, seed bank, Tsuga canadensis. The forests of central New England lie in Boose et al. 2001) with fine-scale environmen- the transition hardwood-white pine-hemlock tal variation. After various types of distur- region and are a heterogeneous mosaic of bance, interactions among species, their envi- deciduous trees (principally red oak Quercus ronment, land-use history, and successional rubra L., red maple Acer rubrum L., and black dynamics together contribute to the mainte- birch Betula lenta L.) and conifers (principally nance of the landscape-level variability in white pine Pinus strobus L. and eastern species composition. hemlock Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr.) (Cogbill At present, a novel disturbance agent is et al. 2002). The species composition across impacting eastern hemlock-dominated stands the landscape reflects the interaction of in the southern part of hemlock’s natural centuries of land-use, including agriculture range. From Massachusetts, southern New and forestry (Foster and Aber 2004), periodic Hampshire, and southern Maine through the insect outbreaks (Orwig and Foster 1998, Carolinas and into Georgia, eastern hemlocks Johnson et al. 2005), and occasional cata- are declining and dying because of infestation strophic storms (Foster and Boose 1992, by the hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae Annand) and from pre-emptive salvage log- ging (Orwig et al. 2002). The woolly adelgid is 1 Supported by the Harvard Forest and by NSF grants DEB 00-80592 and DEB 01-39495. a homopteran insect introduced from Japan to 2 We thank Peter Bettmann-Kerson for assisting the mid-Atlantic states in the 1950s (McClure with the vegetation and soil sampling in the field, 1987, McClure and Cheah 1999) that began to Audrey Barker-Plotkin for advice and guidance in heavily infest trees in New England in the mid- the field, and for providing data used in Tables 1 and 4; Jessica Butler for her assistance in the to-late 1980s (Orwig et al. 2002). This rapidly laboratory; Elizabeth Farnsworth and Jerry Jenkins spreading insect kills trees of all sizes and age for confirming seedling identifications; and Ramona classes within 4–20 years after infestation Latham for additional advice and support. Associ- (Orwig et al. 2002). Since the early 1990s, ate Editor John Burk, Editor-in-Chief Brian McCarthy, David Mladenoff, Glenn Motzkin, Dave hemlock, which is of low economic value, has Orwig, and an anonymous reviewer provided useful been logged by landowners throughout New comments on early versions of the manuscript. England in anticipation of future infestation 3 Author for correspondence: aellison@fas. by the adelgid (Orwig et al. 2002). harvard.edu Received for publication October 13, 2005, and in Suppressed saplings and soil seed banks are revised form March 3, 2006. an important source of forest regeneration 393 394 JOURNAL OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL SOCIETY [VOL.133 following disturbances that cause death or In this study, we had three objectives: (1) to removal of overstory trees (Thompson 1987, describe the seed bank composition of hem- 1989, Lambers et al. 2005). The understory of lock and young hardwood stands in north- hemlock stands in the northern portion of central Massachusetts; (2) to determine how hemlock’s range (from Pennsylvania north- seed bank composition in these stands varied ward into southern Canada) is relatively with depth; (3) to provide base-line data for species-poor, and those species that are a long-term manipulative experiment examin- present grow at low densities (Rogers 1980, ing the impact of the hemlock woolly adelgid Mladenoff 1990, Yorks et al. 2000) and are and logging on regeneration of hemlock likely to contribute little to forest regeneration. stands. Following a disturbance, seedlings emerging Unlike previous studies of hemlock seed from the seed bank are likely to experience banks (Mladenoff 1990, Catovsky and Bazzaz little competition for light from these few 2000, Yorks et al. 2000), our soil samples suppressed saplings and thus seedlings are extended well into the mineral soil (B horizon), likely to contribute significantly to forest allowing us to quantify seed bank composition regeneration of declining hemlock stands. In as a function of soil depth. In order to assess contrast, hardwood stands have a relatively regeneration potential of these stands, we dense understory with suppressed saplings of compared seed banks among hemlock stands trees and a dense herbaceous layer, both of and nearby young hardwood stands, and which will likely outcompete seedlings emerg- contrasted the species pool of buried seeds ing from the seed bank. In New England, with the existing understory and overstory hemlock stands lost to logging and the adelgid layers in both hemlock and hardwood stands. are being replaced by stands of black birch Because this study was conducted in the (Betula lenta L.) and other hardwoods (Orwig context of a long-term manipulative experi- et al. 2002) that may alter both the supply of ment (described below), our results provide seeds into the seed bank and the subsequent testable predictions of changes in species regeneration of these former hemlock stands. composition that may occur following loss of In small light gaps caused by single-tree hemlock in New England forests. treefall gaps, seeds near the top of the seed bank are most likely to germinate, and so seeds Study Site. Field work was conducted within in the upper 5–10 cm of soil (O and A horizons) eight 90 3 90 m (0.81 ha) experimental plots have been the focus of previous studies of seed within the 121 ha Simes Tract at the Harvard banks and regeneration in hemlock stands Forest Long-Term Ecological Research Site in (Mladenoff 1990, Catovsky and Bazzaz 2000, Petersham, Massachusetts, USA (Figure 1). Yorks et al. 2000). These studies have found These plots are at the current northern range a relatively species-poor seed bank dominated limit of the hemlock woolly adelgid, and are by the tree Betula alleghaniensis Britton, the part of a long-term experiment in which we are shrubs Sambucus racemosa L. ssp. pubens examining the response of forest ecosystems to (Michx.) House and Rubus spp., and spores hemlock decline and increased harvesting of various ferns, including Dennstaedtia punc- (Barker-Plotkin et al. 2004). At the time of tilobula (Michx.) Moore and Dryopteris inter- this study, there was no adelgid present in any media (Muhl.) A. Gray. of the plots. These eight plots are grouped in As hemlocks succumb to the adelgid, two blocks, each consisting of three plots however, large-scale mortality of trees creates dominated by hemlock and one plot of mixed large, bright patches (Orwig and Foster 1998, northern hardwoods (Table 1). Block 1 (plots Kizlinski et al. 2002), providing opportunities 1–3 and 8) is in undulating terrain bordered on for establishment of more light-demanding its northern edge by a Sphagnum-dominated species. Logging operations further scarify the wetland. Block 2 (plots 4–7) is on a forested soil, exposing seeds buried deeper in the soil to ridge. These plots comprise a hemlock re- conditions suitable for germination (Kizlinski moval experiment: each block consists of et al. 2002). Thus, seeds buried more deeply in a hemlock control (unmanipulated) plot, a plot the soil could contribute significantly to stand in which all hemlock trees were girdled in May regeneration and reestablishment of the un- 2005 to simulate death-by-adelgid, a plot in derstory (Putz 1983, Thompson 1987, Cham- which all hemlocks .20 cm DBH and any bers and MacMahon 1994). merchantable hardwoods and white pine 2006] SULLIVAN AND ELLISON: SEED BANK OF HEMLOCK FORESTS 395 FIG. 1. Map of the study site at the Harvard Forest in north-central Massachusetts. Block 1 consists of hemlock plots 1–3 and hardwood plot 8, and Block 2 consists of hemlock plots 4–6 and hardwood plot 7. (Pinus strobus) were logged and mechanically collected from the central 30 3 30 m area of removed from the site in February–April 2005, each of the six hemlock and two hardwood and a hardwood control plot.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us