Pathogens of Dikerogammarus Haemobaphes Regulate Host Activity and Survival, but Also Threaten Native Amphipod Populations in the UK

Pathogens of Dikerogammarus Haemobaphes Regulate Host Activity and Survival, but Also Threaten Native Amphipod Populations in the UK

Vol. 136: 63–78, 2019 DISEASES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS Published online October 2§ https://doi.org/10.3354/dao03195 Dis Aquat Org Contribution to DAO Special 8 ‘Amphipod disease: model systems, invasions and systematics’ OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Pathogens of Dikerogammarus haemobaphes regulate host activity and survival, but also threaten native amphipod populations in the UK Jamie Bojko1,2, Grant D. Stentiford2,3, Paul D. Stebbing4, Chris Hassall1, Alice Deacon1, Benjamin Cargill1, Benjamin Pile1, Alison M. Dunn1,* 1Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK 2Pathology and Microbial Systematics Theme, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Weymouth Laboratory, Weymouth, Dorset DT4 8UB, UK 3European Union Reference Laboratory for Crustacean Diseases, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Weymouth Laboratory, Weymouth, Dorset DT4 8UB, UK 4Epidemiology and Risk Team, Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Weymouth Laboratory, Weymouth, Dorset DT4 8UB, UK ABSTRACT: Dikerogammarus haemobaphes is a non-native amphipod in UK freshwaters. Studies have identified this species as a low-impact invader in the UK, relative to its cousin Dikero gammarus villosus. It has been suggested that regulation by symbionts (such as Microsporidia) could explain this difference in impact. The effect of parasitism on D. haemobaphes is largely unknown. This was explored herein using 2 behavioural assays measuring activity and aggregation. First, D. haemobaphes were screened histologically post-assay, identifying 2 novel viruses (D. haemo baphes bi-facies-like virus [DhbflV], D. haemobaphes bacilliform virus [DhBV]), Cucumispora ornata (Micro sporidia), Apicomplexa, and Digenea, which could alter host behaviour. DhBV infection burden increased host activity, and C. ornata infection reduced host activity. Second, native inver- tebrates were collected from the invasion site at Carlton Brook, UK, and tested for the presence of C. ornata. PCR screening identified that Gammarus pulex and other native invertebrates were positive for C. ornata. The host range of this parasite, and its impact on host survival, was addition- ally explored using D. haemobaphes, D. villosus, and G. pulex in a laboratory trial. D. haemo baphes and G. pulex became infected by C. ornata, which also lowered survival rate. D. villosus did not become infected. A PCR protocol for DhbflV was also applied to D. haemobaphes after the survival trial, associating this virus with decreased host survival. In conclusion, D. haemobaphes has a complex relationship with parasites in the UK environment. C. ornata likely regulates populations by decreasing host survival and activity, but despite this benefit, the parasite threatens susceptible native wildlife. KEY WORDS: Cucumispora · Population regulation · Behaviour · Pathogen profile · Virus · Wildlife pathogen · Emerging disease 1. INTRODUCTION & Mooney 2004). An often-overlooked concept in invasion biology, particularly in behavioural assess- Invasive species impact negatively on the environ- ment, is the complex relationships that invasive alien ments they encounter, causing damage to biodiver- species share with their parasites and pathogens (Vil- sity (Molnar et al. 2008) and ecosystem services (Dukes cinskas 2015). In some invasions, symbionts are left © The authors 2019. Open Access under Creative Commons by *Corresponding author: [email protected] Attribution Licence. Use, distribution and reproduction are un - §Advance View was available online March 1, 2018 restricted. Authors and original publication must be credited. Publisher: Inter-Research · www.int-res.com 64 Dis Aquat Org 136: 63–78, 2019 behind in the native range (parasite release), increas- 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS ing the fitness of an invasive population (Torchin et al. 2003, Lee & Klasing 2004, Heger & Jeschke 2014). Due to the wide range of methods utilised in this Alternatively, symbionts are sometimes introduced study, we have provided a flow chart of how the ex- along with their host in an invasion event, and can periment was conducted in Fig. S1 in the Supplement form part of a disease introduction event, resulting in at www. int-res. com/ articles/ suppl/ d136 p063_ supp .pdf. the potential for host switching events and the emer- gence of wildlife pathogens (Roy et al. 2017), or could help regulate the impact of their invasive host in the 2.1. Field sampling invasive range (Dunn & Hatcher 2015). Co-introduced pathogens can regulate an invasive Dikerogammarus haemobaphes were collected from host population, and its impact, by decreasing inva- Carlton Brook (Leicestershire, UK) (British National sive behaviours and increasing mortality rates (Dunn Grid [BNG] ref: SK3870004400) for behavioural assess- & Hatcher 2015). Parallels can be drawn between this ment prior to histological screening and to take part in process and biological control, which aims to decrease a survival trial with the microsporidian parasite Cuc u - the impacts and population size of a pest through the mi spora ornata (Table 1). In addition, freshwater mus- use of its natural enemies, such as microsporidians sels, beetle larvae, fly larvae, annelids, isopods, fresh- and viruses (Lacey et al. 2001, de Faria & Wraight water snails, and the freshwater amphipod Crangonyx 2007, Hajek et al. 2007). One group of invaders that pseudo gracillis were also collected and fixed on site in require control are invasive amphipods in the UK. ethanol for microsporidian PCR diagnostics (Table 1). The identification of symbionts that regulate invasive Dikerogammarus villosus were collected from Graf- amphipod behaviour and survival will help to pro- ham Water (BNG ref: TL1442767283), and 2 collec- vide information on how to control their populations tions were also made of Gammarus pulex — one from at invasion sites. a population found co-occurring at the Carlton Brook The invasive ‘demon shrimp’ Dikerogammarus site alongside D. haemobaphes and a second popula- haemo baphes is an amphipod native to the Ponto- tion from Meanwood Park, Leeds (BNG ref: SE- Caspian region, which invaded the UK in 2012 and 2803737255), where D. haemobaphes have not been carried with it the microsporidian parasite Cucumis- detected to date — for a transmission and survival trial pora ornata (Bojko et al. 2015). D. haemobaphes is to observe potential infection with C. ornata (Table 1). considered a low-impact, non-native relative of Di - kero gammarus villosus (the ‘killer shrimp’), which invaded the UK in 2010 without microsporidian, 2.2. Behavioural trials for Dikerogammarus acanthocephalan, or viral symbionts (MacNeil et al. haemobaphes 2010, Bojko et al. 2013, Dodd et al. 2014, Bovy et al. 2015). Whether parasites are the determining factor Individual D. haemobaphes (n = 282) underwent amongst several possible factors (e.g. fecundity, niche measurement of various morphological characteris- occupation) that regulate D. haemobaphes popula- tics, including sex, presence and number of off- tions, and lower their impact relative to D. villosus in spring, length, weight, and pair status. Animals were the UK, is currently unclear. transported to the University of Leeds and acclima- In this study, we compare the activity, aggregation, tised in canal water with vegetation at 14°C for a and rate of survival between healthy and infected D. minimum of 24 h before use in behaviour trials. The haemobaphes, collected directly from their invasive activity trial included 120 animals, the aggregation habitat. First, histological diagnostics were applied to trial included 63 animals, and the remaining 99 were animal carcasses after behavioural trials to determine measured and screened using histology but not their individual symbiont profiles, to compare para- included in a behavioural trial. Each animal was only sitism and behaviour. Second, animals were collected used once, and on completion of the behavioural trial from the invasion site and screened for the presence of were fixed for histological screening. Microsporidia, to assess the host range of C. ornata in the environment. Finally, survival trials were used to assess the transmissibility of C. ornata and the effects 2.2.1 Activity assessment of selected parasites on host survival in 3 species: the type host D. haemobaphes, a close relative D. villosus, Activity assessment was conducted in a similar and the native keystone species Gammarus pulex. fashion to the study by Bacela-Spychalska et al. Bojko et al.: Pathogens of invasive Dikerogammarus haemobaphes 65 Table 1. A breakdown of the animals sampled during the study to explore the behaviour, transmission trial, survival, and host range experimentation. Dates given as dd/mm/yyyy Species/organism Sample date Sample location n Reason for collection Dikerogammarus 18/05/2015 Carlton Brook 282 Activity and aggregation behaviour trials and to haemobaphes 19/07/2015 Carlton Brook collect physiology data 27/07/2015 Carlton Brook 03/08/2015 Carlton Brook 14/08/2016 Carlton Brook 56 Survival trial (control n = 29, exposed = 27) Dikerogammarus villosus 20/09/2016 Grafham Water 87 Survival trial and on-site fixed samples (control n = 29, exposed = 28) Gammarus pulex 14/08/2016 Carlton Brook 36 Survival trial and on-site fixed samples (control n = 9, exposed = 10) 01/11/2016 Meanwood Park 57 Survival trial and on-site fixed samples (control n = 13, exposed = 14) Crangonyx pseudogracillis 18/05/2015 Carlton Brook 1 Cucumispora ornata screening Freshwater

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    16 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us