Capital Plan 2022 Update Tonight’s Agenda • Overview of the Current Capital Program • Facility Planning Process/Background – Methodology – Condition and Adequacy Assessments – Enrollment Projections – Review of Instructional Program Support – Facility Plan Components of the Proposed Capital Plan • Other Components of the Proposed Capital Plan • Feedback 2 Capital Planning 101 A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a short-range plan (5 years in our case) which identifies capital projects and equipment purchases, provides a planning schedule and suggests options for financing the plan. Funding or financing options include: • Bonds / Debt • Property Taxes • GaDOE Capital Outlay Funds • Special-Purpose Local-Option Sales Tax (SPLOST) – 1 cent sales tax 3 Capital Plans support our students daily 4 Meeting our enrollment needs Fulton County Capital Programs Since 1997 100,000 Capital Program 2017 New Schools = 8 Additions = 6 Capital Program 2012 95,000 New Schools = 10 Additions = 10 Capital Program 2007 90,000 New Schools = 10 Additions = 6 Capital Program 2002 85,000 New Schools = 17 Additions = 12 Enrollment 80,000 75,000 70,000 65,000 60,000 5 Capital funded facilities College Park ES Replacement New Hwy. 9 ES Opened 2014 Opened 2015 as Esther Jackson ES Heards Ferry ES Replacement Opened 2015 Asa Hilliard ES Opened 2015 Esther Jackson ES Replacement Opening 2016 New Derrick Road ES Opening 2016 McNair MS Replacement Gullatt ES Replacement Opened 2015 Opening 2017 6 Capital funded improvements Middle School Additions CTE Additions • Taylor Road MS • Banneker HS • Autrey Mill MS • Cambridge HS • Sandy Springs MS • Hopewell MS Main Entrance Security Renovations Enhancements • HVAC • Tri-Cities HS • Roofs • Chattahoochee • Interior Finishes • Creekside HS • Pavement • Roswell HS • Cabinets/Casework • Centennial HS Elementary Administrative School Consolidation Playgrounds Transportation Furniture and Equipment • Replace 122 buses • Furnishings • Replace 79 support • Instructional vehicles equipment 7 Technology accomplishments Transforming learning. Powered by technology. Digital Repository Mobile Learning • Launched digital repository that aids the • Deploying 65,000 student devices district in its delivery of electronic material • Provided over 7,000 laptops to teachers for instructional and professional • Provided Office 365 email and collaboration development purposes tools Career & Technical Education 21st Century Skills / Interactive • Upgraded middle and high schools with new • Installed 7,000 interactive projectors in technology (480 desktops & 208 classrooms laptops/carts) to support Career & Technical • Supporting growth of Fulton Virtual School Education program engineering labs for online and blended learning Infrastructure • Tripled number of wireless access points (over 9,000) • Deployed district-wide unified communication system • Built new data center in support of student access to technology • Refreshed 750 printers / copiers and all school network hardware • Enhanced information security 8 Capital Plan 2022 STEM Focus Campuses High School Campus Master Plan Instructional Facility Educational State of Initiatives and Specifications Facilities Master Requirements Plan Student Enrollment Projections Technology Plan Land / Reserves Furniture Capital Plan and Debt Service Equipment 2022 Safety and Transportation Security New component for Capital Plan 2022 Funding / Financing 9 Capital Plan 2022 STEM Focus Campuses High School Campus Master Plan Instructional Facility Educational State of Initiatives and Specifications Facilities Master Requirements Plan Student Enrollment Projections Technology Plan Land / Reserves Furniture Capital Plan and Debt Service Equipment 2022 Safety and Transportation Security New component for Capital Plan 2022 Funding / Financing 10 Facility Planning Process Assessment Team • Specialized K-12 facility • Educational Specification assessment group Alignment, Master • National portfolio: Planning – 855M sq. ft. assessed – Assessed 13,167 of 98,700 public schools • MAPPSTM capital • Architectural, Electrical, planning software Mechanical & Plumbing 11 Community Input Online Survey Focused on: . Community Perception of condition of schools . Community Perception of quality of program spaces . Core Academics, Special Education, Media, Fine/Performing Arts, Athletics . Community Priorities for planning decision making Results: . 1,795 responses . 624 Northwest . 574 Northeast . 407 Central . 124 South . (66) did not respond to school affiliation 12 Community Input - Northwest Northwest—624 responses Condition of Schools’ Perception Alpharetta Elementary School Alpharetta High School Excellent Good Poor Very Poor Don't Know Birmingham Falls Elementary School Elementary 34.6% 53.1% 7.6% 1.9% 2.7% Cambridge High School Middle 16.7% 54.4% 11.9% 2.6% 14.5% Cogburn Woods Elementary School High 29.8% 42.4% 12.8% 3.0% 12.0% Crabapple Crossing Elementary School Crabapple Middle School Creek View Elementary School Elkins Pointe Middle School Hembree Springs Elementary School Hopewell Middle School Planning Priorities (10 being the Highest) Lake Windward Elementary School Manning Oaks Elementary School Milton High School Mimosa Elementary School Mountain Park Elementary School New Prospect Elementary School Northwestern Middle School Roswell High School Roswell North Elementary School Summit Hill Elementary School Sweet Apple Elementary School Webb Bridge Middle School 13 Community Input - Northeast Northeast—574 responses Condition of Schools’ Perception Abbotts Hill Elementary School Autrey Mill Middle School Excellent Good Poor Very Poor Don't Know Barnwell Elementary School Elementary 24.0% 61.5% 8.1% 1.8% 4.6% Centennial High School Middle 25.3% 54.3% 10.2% 2.0% 8.2% Chattahoochee High School High 34.4% 46.0% 8.5% 2.3% 8.9% Dolvin Elementary School Findley Oaks Elementary School Haynes Bridge Middle School Hillside Elementary School Holcomb Bridge Middle School Planning Priorities (10 being the Highest) Johns Creek High School Medlock Bridge Elementary School Northview High School Northwood Elementary School Ocee Elementary School River Eves Elementary School River Trail Middle School Shakerag Elementary School State Bridge Crossing Elementary School Taylor Road Middle School Wilson Creek Elementary School 14 Community Input - Central Central—407 responses Condition of Schools’ Perception Conley Hills Elementary School Dunwoody Springs Elementary School Excellent Good Poor Very Poor Don't Know Frank McClarin High School Elementary 52.4% 29.1% 8.8% 1.1% 8.5% Hamilton E. Holmes Ele mentary School Middle 14.1% 48.7% 14.7% 4.0% 18.4% High 4.3% 27.1% 36.8% 26.1% 5.6% Hapeville Elementary School High Point Elementary School Ison Springs Elementary School Lake Forest Elementary School North Springs High School Planning Priorities (10 being the Highest) Parklane Elementary School Paul D. West Middle School Ridgeview Middle School Riverwood High School Sandy Springs Middle School Spalding Drive Elementary School Tri-Cities High School Woodland Elementary School Woodland Middle School 15 Community Input - South South—124 responses Bear Creek Middle School Condition of Schools’ Perception Benjamin Banneker High School Excellent Good Poor Very Poor Don't Know Brookview Elementary School Elementary 20.8% 44.6% 23.8% 4.0% 6.9% Camp Creek Middle School Middle 16.2% 61.6% 10.1% 5.1% 7.1% Campbell Elementary School High 31.9% 52.2% 8.8% 2.7% 4.4% Cliftondale Elementary School Creekside High School Evoline C. West Elementary School Feldwood Elementary School Heritage Elementary School Langston Hughes High School Planning Priorities (10 being the Highest) Liberty Point Elementary School Love T. Nolan Elementary School Mary M. Bethune Elementary School Oakley Elementary School Palmetto Elementary School Randolph Elementary School Renaissance Elementary School Renaissance Middle School Sandtown Middle School Seaborn Lee Elementary School SL Lewis Elementary School Stonewall Tell Elementary School Westlake High School 16 Facility Planning Process Project Objectives and Benefits • Primary Objectives – Align educational space standards with instruction – Deliver comprehensive facility assessment – Support FCS capital improvement program • Benefits – Promote districtwide equity – Foster objectivity and transparency – Provide data to prioritize capital investments 17 Facility Planning Process FCS Comprehensive Assessment Educational Adequacy Facility Portfolio Options Planning Assessment Campus & building Evaluation of scenarios to address Standards based evaluation to inventory condition, adequacy, and utilization determine facilities support of buildings curriculum Facility Master Plan FCS’ path forward Facility Condition Assessment Evaluation of each building’s condition Community Engagement Informing stakeholders 18 Facility Planning Process Updating Educational Space Standards FCS Staff and DeJong-Richter developed and executed an inclusive process to revise the District’s educational space standards (previously known as educational specifications). Subject matter expert interviews Series of workshops with teachers, experts, central office staff, principals, parents and community members Community web feedback Community meetings Board approval 19 Facility Planning Process Facility Assessment Methodology • Project Kick Off – Establish goals and objectives • Educational Adequacy Guidelines – Standards based on district specifications • Data Gathering – On site assessments • Data Analysis and Cost Estimating – MAPPS™