Papers of the NIXON

Papers of the NIXON

Papers of the NIXON Part 6, The President's Office Files Series B: Daily News Summaries Annotated by the President 1969-1973 RESEARCH COLLECTIONS IN AMERICAN POLITICS William Leuchtenburg General Editor PAPERS OF THE NIXON WHITE HOUSE Joan Hoff-Wilson Series Editor Parte. The President's Office Files Series B. Daily News Summaries Annotated by the President, 1969-73 Project Coordinator Paul Kesaris STAFF President Paul P. Massa Executive Vice President James F. Connolly Vice President and Editorial Director Susan I. Jover Director of Congressional and Legal Services Steven F. Daniel Vice President, UPA Paul Kesaris Managing Editor Margaret A. Lynch Indexer John Montegu Production Coordinator Dorothy W. Rogers Asst. Production Coordinator Debra G. Türneil Applications Programming Manager Andrew M. Ross Systems and Operations Manager Mojtaba Anvari Computer Operators Nahid Hamedani, Stephanie Hiñes, S. Allen Paige Administrative Services Manager Lee Mayer Micropublishing Projects Production and Services: Vice President, Manufacturing William C. Smith Plant Operations Manager William Idol Administrative Assistant Sharon Foster Supervisor, Document Preparation Bea Lamkin Published by: UPA, an imprint of Congressional Information Service 4520 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, U.S.A. Copyright © 1991 by University Publications of America All rights reserved. Printed and Bound in the United States of America International Standard Book Number 1-55655-076-6 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. General Introduction p. v Introduction to Daily News Summaries Annotated by the President p. ix User Instructions p. xiii BIBLIOGRAPHY OF DOCUMENTS p. 1 INDEX BY SUBJECTS AND NAMES p. 47 GENERAL INTRODUCTION Once the bulk of the papers and tapes from the five-and- dramatically altering the control that previous Presidents had one-half years Richard Milhous Nixon served in the White exercised over materials produced during their time in office, House are released, his presidency will become the best thus ultimately producing new archival procedures for process- documented in United States history. Because of Nixon's un- ing such papers. This 1974 Presidential Recordings and Mate- precedented forced resignation from office in 1974, little about rials Preservation Act: 1) authorized the seizing of all Nixon his truncated administration appears normal in retrospect, in- documents and tapes, placing them in control of the federal cluding the complicated problems surrounding his presiden- government; and 2) mandated that any abuse-of-power infor- tial papers. The sheer magnitude of the collection overwhelms mation in this presidential material be made available to the scholars and nonspecialists alike. There are, for example, forty public as soon as possible. Consequently, federal archivists of million pages of documents in the White House Central Files the National Archives and Records Service of the GSA (now and 4,000 hours of recorded conversations. At the end of 1987, an independent agency known as the National Archives and only three million documents and 12 Vi hours of tapes had been Records Administration, or NARA) began to establish guide- opened, because unlike other sets of presidential papers, lines for reviewing all of the documents and tapes from the Watergate-related congressional legislation and a web of liti- White House Central Files. gation have prevented the release for research of a vast ma- This review process was complicated by the fact that the 1974 jority of the least controversial of this unique collection of Act was not exclusive; that is, it included both the official and Nixon White House documents and tapes. As Watergate events the unofficial Nixon material in the government's custody. This unfolded in 1973 and 1974, questions about access to, and pro- has meant that archivists have had to cull from these presiden- tection of, documents generated by the Nixon administration tial papers all private and personal material relating solely to assumed prominence. In May 1973, both presidential counselor the President's family or other nonpublic activities, including Leonard Garment and Elliot Richardson, then Attorney "private political associations." The latter category proved General, advised Nixon to place the papers of H. R. Haldeman, particularly troublesome in the processing of not only the John Ehrlichman, and John Dean under the protection of the "Special Files," but also for the bulk of the Central Files as FBI. Nixon agreed on the condition that there be no access well, because most of the Nixon documents have some political to these papers "without written presidential consent." Ex- content and few are concerned exclusively with the private ecutive privilege became the issue of the day as Congress political association of the person who wrote or received the demanded and the President refused to produce those records document. The new review process has also delayed the release and tapes deemed pivotal for the resolution of an unprece- of Nixon-related material. Since FDR, major portions of the dented national constitutional crisis. Although the courts ul- papers of other modern presidents have been opened within timately overruled Nixon's claims of executive privilege dur- a half-dozen years after the end of their terms in office, but ing the course of the various Watergate investigations, after the least controversial materials from the Nixon years have lan- Nixon left office he signed an agreement with Arthur Samp- guished unprocessed, in part because of this extremely com- son, head of the General Services Administration (GSA), that plicated and litigious review process. mandated the destruction of the tapes and allowed considerable For three years Nixon challenged the 1974 Act in the courts opportunity for destruction of some presidential papers as well. to prevent the release of the Special Files. Ironically, this Special This September 1974 Nixon-Sampson agreement came into ex- Files Unit had been originally created in September 1972 within istence when the National Archives and Records Service the Nixon White House to provide a separate storage location (NARS) was under the jurisdiction of GSA, and so the Ar- for documents removed from the Central Files and selected chivist of the United States had not been involved in its staff members' offices because they were considered "sen- negotiation. sitive." They included the complete files of the staff secretary, The Nixon-Sampson agreement created an archival firestorm the President's Office, and the offices of H. R. Haldeman, that swept through both the halls of Congress and the scholarly John Ehrlichman, John Dean, and Charles Colson. community of researchers. Signed without the knowledge of In 1977, after the Supreme Court upheld the 1974 Presiden- the National Archives, it not only gave Nixon wide latitude tial Recordings and Materials Act as constitutional, it took in controlling access to the papers of his controversial ad- another two years for attorneys representing the former Presi- ministration, but also left in doubt whether they would ever dent and federal archivists to work out an agreement permit- be donated through the National Archives to a presidential ting NARA to systematically screen and prepare for research library and made available for study, as had the papers of all purposes the Special Files and the White House tapes. In other occupants of the White House since Herbert Hoover. February 1979, this unusual "negotiated agreement" called Never before had the preservation of an entire documentary for the permanent removal of "any political document in the record of a single administration become an issue of national files that did not have a direct connection to the President's scholarly and journalistic concern; never before had access to constitutional powers or statutory duties" and the return of records been so personalized for the American public. these documents to Nixon with the understanding that "he In the immediate wake of the President's resignation over would donate them in the future to the National Archives." Watergate, criticism of the Nixon-Sampson agreement predic- Because of these and other unique procedures, the processing tably resulted in unparalleled congressional action. In of the Nixon papers did not begin until five years after he resign- December 1974, President Gerald Ford approved legislation ed as President. Nixon Papers, Part 6(B). Daily News Summaries Annotated by the President v Since that time, Nixon and/or his key aides have brought of the 1970s. Consequently, journalists, but not historians, were additional suits attempting to prevent the opening of generally disappointed and confused by the release of the first documents in these controversial Special Files. In the interim, records from the White House Central Files, because they did archivists have reduced the volume of the Nixon Special Files not contain sensational revelations. The initial 1.5 million pages by six percent; legal representatives of the former President of documents opened in December 1986 focused on domestic and members of his administration have withdrawn another subject files ranging from welfare and environmental issues ten percent. Although users can request mandatory reviews to Supreme Court appointments and desegregation of schools. of both sets of winnowed material, the

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    132 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us