Nested Quantifiers and Rules of Inference

Nested Quantifiers and Rules of Inference

PK 1.5 & 1.6 Nested Quantifiers and Rules of Inference By: Emily B and David R What Are Nested ● They are quantifiers within the scope of another quantifier. Quantifiers?? ● ∀x∃y(x + y = 0) ⇔ ∀xQ(x), where Q(x) = ∃y(x + y = 0). ● They come, but are not limited, in the following flavors: ○ ∀x ∀yQ(x,y) ○ ∀x ∃yQ(x,y) ○ ∃x ∀yQ(x,y) ○ ∃x ∃yQ(x,y) ○ ∀x ∀y ∃zQ(x,y,z) ○ Yada yada yada Order Matters! ● In all cases unless the type of quantification are the same ○ ∀x ∀yQ(x,y) ⇔ ∀y ∀xQ(x,y) ○ ∃x ∃yQ(x,y) ⇔ ∃y ∃xQ(x,y) ● Other than that, the order of quantifiers will affect the truth of the quantification ○ ∀x ∃yQ(x,y) != ∃y ∀xQ(x,y) ● Can be thought of as loops with the left most quantifier being the outer loop until the rightmost inner loop. ○ For example, in ∀x∃y(x + y = 0), you would loop through ALL the elements in the domain for x, searching for AT LEAST one element for y that satisfies the statement. ○ In ∃x∀yQ(x,y), you would loop through the domain, testing Work? every x until you find ONE x that satisfies the statement for ALL y How Do They A neat observation: ● After going through some observations, the book concludes that: ○ if ∃y∀xP(x, y) is true, then ∀x∃yP(x, y) must also be true ○ However, if ∀x∃yP(x, y) is true, it is not necessary for ∃y∀xP(x, y) to be true Table on how to read these quantifications Turning Sentences into Logical Expressions ● “The sum of two positive integers is always positive” x & y ϵ Z. ○ ∀x∀y((x > 0) ∧ (y > 0) → (x + y > 0)) ● “Every real number except zero has a multiplicative inverse” x & y ϵ Z. ○ ∀x((x ≠ 0) → ∃y(xy = 1)) Negating Nested Quantifiers ● Nested Quantifiers can be negated by using the same De Morgan’s laws for negating statements involving a single quantifier. ○ ¬∀xP(x) → ∃x¬P(x) ○ ¬∃xP(x) → ∀x¬P(x) Example ● ∀x∃y(xy = 1) negated is: ○ ¬∀x∃y(xy = 1) ⇔ ∃x¬∃y(xy = 1) ∃x¬∃y(xy = 1) ⇔ ∃x∀y[¬(xy = 1)] ∃x∀y[¬(xy = 1)] ⇔ ∃x∀y(xy ≠ 1) Swap the quantifier types! Wrap-up of Nested Quantifiers ● They are essentially just sequential single quantifiers that can be read as if they were nested loops ● Order does matter for the quantifiers ● Negation rules are the same as single quantifiers, just that this one chains one after another. ● Arguments ○ Sequence of statements ● Valid Proofs! ○ When statements lead to a true conclusion ● Fallacies ○ Incorrect reasoning Valid arguments Valid Arguments in Propositional Logic ∴ Denotes “Therefore” ∴ is used in the Argument Form Example: ( (p → q) ∧ p ) → q p → q p ∴ q Rules of Inference in Propositional Logic Rules of Inference ● Used as building blocks ● Tautology is the basis Using the Rules to Build Arguments Premises- p→q, ᅟᅠᆨp→r, and r→s and conclusion q→s Steps Reason 1. p→q Premise 2. ᅟᅠᆨq→ᅟᅠᆨp Contrapositive 3. ᅟᅠᆨp→r Premise 4. ᅟᅠᆨq→r Hypothetical... 5. r→s Premise 6. ᅟᅠᆨq→ᅟᅠᆨs Hypothetical... Fallacies Fallacy of Affirming the Conclusion Fallacy of Denying the Hypothesis Example: Example: ((p→q) ∧ q ) → p ((p→q) ∧ ᅟᅠᆨp ) → ᅟᅠᆨq False when p = False & q = True False when p = False & q = True Watch out for these fallacies! Blurry Table... Quantified Statements Universal Instantiation Universal Generalization ● P(c) is true, where c is the ● ∀xP(c) is true, given the premise particular member of the domain, that P(c) is true for all elements c given the premise ∀xP(c) in the domain Even More Quantified Statements! Existential Instantiation Existential Generalization ● There’s an element c in the ● Used to conclude that ∃xP(x) is domain for which P(c) is true if we true when a particular element c know that ∃xP(x) is true with P(c) true is known How to Use Quantified Statements Take it step by step! Steps Reason Example: 1. ∀x( D(x)→C(x) ) Premise 2. D(y)→C(y) Universal Instantiation Premises-∀x( D(x)→C(x) ) and D(y) 3. D(y) Premise conclusion C(y) 4. C(y) Modus Ponens Let’s Recall... ● There are many rules to know! ○ 8 total rules in Rules of Inference ○ 4 total rules in Rules of Inference for Quantitative Statements ● These rules are quite useful when finding the solution ○ Use the premises to lead to the desired conclusion! ○ 1 step at a time!.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    20 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us