Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for South Holland in Lincolnshire Further electoral review November 2005 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact The Boundary Committee for England: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee for England? 5 Executive summary 7 1 Introduction 13 2 Current electoral arrangements 17 3 Submissions received 21 4 Analysis and draft recommendations 23 Electorate figures 24 Council size 24 Electoral equality 27 General analysis 28 Warding arrangements 29 a Crowland, Deeping St Nicholas, Donington, Gosberton 30 Village, Pinchbeck, Surfleet, Weston & Moulton and Whaplode wards b Fleet, Gedney, Holbeach Hurn, Holbeach St John’s, Holbeach 33 Town, Long Sutton, Sutton Bridge and The Saints wards c Spalding Castle, Spalding Monks House, Spalding St John’s, 35 Spalding St Mary’s, Spadling St Paul’s and Spalding Wygate wards Conclusions 37 Parish electoral arrangements 38 5 What happens next? 39 6 Mapping 41 Appendices A Glossary and abbreviations 43 B Code of practice on written consultation 47 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. It is responsible for conducting reviews as directed by The Electoral Commission or the Secretary of State. Members of the Committee are: Pamela Gordon (Chair) Robin Gray Joan Jones CBE Ann M. Kelly Professor Colin Mellors Archie Gall (Director) When conducting reviews our aim is to ensure that the number of electors represented by each councillor in an area is as nearly as possible the same, taking into account local circumstances. We can recommend changes to ward boundaries, the number of councillors and ward names. We can also recommend changes to the electoral arrangements of parish and town councils. 5 6 Executive summary The Boundary Committee for England is the body responsible for conducting electoral reviews of local authorities. A Further Electoral Review of South Holland is being undertaken to provide improved levels of electoral equality across the district. This review aims to ensure that the number of voters represented by each district councillor is approximately the same. As a result of the poor levels of electoral inequality that existed in 2003, The Electoral Commission directed The Boundary Committee to undertake an electoral review of South Holland on 2 June 2004. Current electoral arrangements Under the existing electoral arrangements seven of the 22 wards have variances of more than 10% from the average. This is expected to worsen by 2009, with nine wards having variances of more than 10% from the district average. Every review is conducted in four stages: Stage Stage starts Description One 17 May 2005 Submission of proposals to us Two 9 August 2005 Our analysis and deliberation Three 29 November 2005 Publication of draft recommendations and consultation on them Four 7 March 2006 Analysis of submissions received and formulation of final recommendations Submissions received During Stage One we received 10 submissions. South Holland District Council and Councillor Walls both put forward proposals for the whole district. Crowland, Deeping St Nicholas and Long Sutton parish councils requested the retention of the existing electoral arrangements. Gosberton Parish Council requested that it be placed in a singe ward. Lutton and Holbeach parish councils supported the Council’s proposals. Analysis and draft recommendations Electorate figures The Council is predicting electorate growth of 5% over the next five years. This will be spread across the district, but significant developments in Spalding and Holbeach towns. The Committee considers that these are the best estimates currently available. Council size We received two proposals on council size. The Council proposed a reduction of one member to 37, while Councillor Walls proposed a reduction of 14 members to 24. On 7 the balance of the evidence we were not persuaded to adopt such a large reduction at this time and are therefore adopting the Council’s proposal for a 37 member council. General analysis We propose adopting a mixture of 18 one-, two- and three-member wards. In Spalding town we propose adopting the Council’s proposals subject to a number of amendments to improve electoral equality. In the east of the district we propose a minor amendment to the Council’s proposals to improve electoral equality in its Long Sutton and Sutton Bridge wards. In the rural west area, in the light of poor levels of electoral equality and limited community identity evidence, we propose moving away from the Council’s proposals and creating a number of three-member wards. We propose creating three-member Crowland & Deeping St Nicholas; Donington, Quadring & Gosberton; and Pinchbeck & Surfleet wards. What happens next? There will now be a consultation period, during which we encourage comment on our draft recommendations on future electoral arrangements for South Holland contained in this report. We welcome views from all parts of the community and believe that the more feedback we receive, based on clear evidence, the better informed we will be in forming our final recommendations. We will take into account all submissions received by 6 March 2006. Any received after this date may not be taken into account. We have not finalised our conclusions on the electoral arrangements for South Holland and welcome comments from interested parties. In particular, we found our decisions regarding Crowland & Deeping St Nicholas, Donington, Quadring & Gosberton and Pinchbeck & Surfleet wards to be a difficult judgement between our statutory criteria. We would particularly welcome local views, backed up by demonstrable evidence, during Stage Three. We will consider all the evidence submitted to us during the consultation period before preparing our final recommendations. Express your views by writing directly to us: Review Manager South Holland Review The Boundary Committee for England Trevelyan House Great Peter Street London SW1P 2HW [email protected] This report is available to download at www.boundarycommittee.org.uk. 8 Table 1: Draft recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas councillors 1 Crowland & 3 Parishes of Crowland and Deeping St Deeping St Nicholas Nicholas 2 Donington, 3 Parishes of Donington, Gosberton and Quadring & Quadring Gosberton 3 Fleet 1 Parish of Fleet 4 Gedney 1 Parish of Gedney 5 Holbeach Hurn 1 The existing Hurn parish ward of Holbeach parish 6 Holbeach Town 3 The proposed Town parish ward of Holbeach parish 7 Long Sutton 3 Parishes of Long Sutton, Lutton and Tydd St Mary 8 Moulton, Weston 3 Parishes of Cowbit, Moulton and Weston & Cowbit 9 Pinchbeck & 3 Parishes of Pinchbeck and Surfleet Surfleet 10 Spalding Castle 1 Parts of the existing Spalding Castle and Spalding St John’s wards 11 Spalding Monks 2 Part of the existing Spalding Monks House House and Spalding Wygate wards 12 Spalding St 2 Part of the existing Spalding Castle, Spalding John's Monks House, Spalding St John’s and Spalding Wygate wards 13 Spalding St 2 Parts of the existing Spalding St Mary’s, Mary's Spalding St Paul’s and Spalding St John’s wards 14 Spalding St 2 Parts of the existing Spalding St Mary’s and Paul's Spalding St Paul’s wards 15 Spalding Wygate 2 Part of the existing Spalding Castle and Spalding Wygate wards 16 Sutton Bridge 2 Parishes of Sutton Bridge and Little Sutton 17 The Saints 1 Parishes of Gedney Hill, Sutton St Edmund and Sutton St James 18 Whaplode & 2 Parish of Whaplode and the proposed St Holbeach St John’s parish ward of Holbeach parish John’s Notes: 1. The whole of the borough is parished except for the town of Spalding. 2. The maps accompanying this report illustrate the proposed wards outlined above. 3. We have made a number of minor boundary amendments to ensure that existing ward boundaries adhere to ground detail. These changes do not affect any electors. 9 Table 2: Draft recommendations for South Holland District Number of Number of Number of Electorate Variance from Electorate Variance from Ward name electors per electors per councillors (2004) average % (2009) average % councillor councillor 1 Crowland & 3 4,609 1,536 -13 4,751 1,584 -15 Deeping St Nicholas 2 Donington, 3 5,625 1,875 6 5,818 1,939 4 Quadring & Gosberton 3 Fleet 1 1,734 1,734 -2 1,778 1,778 -5 4 Gedney 1 1,830 1,830 3 1,862 1,862 0 5 Holbeach Hurn 1 1,754 1,754 -1 1,791 1,791 -4 6 Holbeach 3 5,677 1,892 7 6,154 2,051 10 Town 7 Long Sutton 3 5,715 1,905 7 6,029 2,010 8 8 Moulton, 3 5,233 1,744 -2 5,358 1,786 -4 Weston & Cowbit 9 Pinchbeck & 3 5,321 1,774 0 5,379 1,793 -4 Surfleet 10 Spalding 1 1,546 1,546 -13 1,798 1,798 -4 Castle 11 Spalding 2 3,677 1,839 4 3,873 1,937 4 Monks House 10 Table 2: Draft recommendations for South Holland District 12 Spalding St 2 3,624 1,812 2 3,790 1,3790 1 John's 13 Spalding St 2 3,678 1,839 4 3,876 1,938 4 Mary's 14 Spalding St 2 3,679 1,840 4 3,836 1,918 3 Paul's 15 Spalding 2 3,173 1,587 -10 3,915 1,958 5 Wygate 16 Sutton Bridge 2 3,362 1,681 -5 3,627 1,814 -3 17 The Saints 1 1,877 1,877 6 1,977 1,977 6 18 Whaplode & 2 3,457 1,729 -2 3,521 1,761 -6 Holbeach St John’s Totals 37 65,571 – – 69,133 – – Averages – – 1,772 – – 1,868 – Source: Electorate figures are based on information provided by South Holland District Council.