Nodal Liquid Theory of the Pseudo-Gap Phase of High-Tc Superconductors Leon Balents, Matthew P. A. Fisher, and Chetan Nayak Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4030 (June 9, 2004) We introduce and study the nodal liquid, a novel zero-temperature quantum phase obtained by quantum-disordering a d-wave superconductor. It has numerous remarkable properties which lead us to suggest it as an explanation of the pseudo-gap state in underdoped high-temperature super- conductors. In the absence of impurities, these include power-law magnetic order, a T -linear spin susceptibility, non-trivial thermal conductivity, and two- and one-particle charge gaps, the latter evi- denced, e.g. in transport and electron photoemission (which exhibits pronounced fourfold anisotropy inherited from the d-wave quasiparticles). We use a 2 + 1-dimensional duality transformation to de- rive an effective field theory for this phase. The theory is comprised of gapless neutral Dirac particles living at the former d-wave nodes, weakly coupled to the fluctuating gauge field of a dual Ginzburg- Landau theory. The nodal liquid interpolates naturally between the d-wave superconductor and the insulating antiferromagnet, and our effective field theory is powerful enough to permit a detailed analysis of a panoply of interesting phenomena, including charge ordering, antiferromagnetism, and d-wave superconductivity. We also discuss the zero-temperature quantum phase transitions which separate the nodal liquid from various ordered phases. I. INTRODUCTION tinction between the high-Tc and conventional SCs, sus- pected for many years and now generally accepted after a number of beautiful and compelling experiments,4,5 is The discovery of the cuprate high-temperature super- their d 2 2 (d-wave) pairing symmetry. This pairing 1 x −y conductors in 1986 was a watershed in the recent history symmetry is a crucial ingredient in a zero-temperature of condensed matter physics, an event which stimulated quantum description. In particular, d-wave symmetry intense experimental and theoretical activity. As sample leads to gapless quasiparticles residing at the four nodes quality and experimental precision have advanced, these of the pair wavefunction. materials’ rich phase diagram and phenomenology have come into focus.2 However, many theoretical efforts have not reached fruition because of a serious obstacle, namely, T that these materials are apparently in a strongly-coupled, T*(x) non-perturbative regime. To put it more bluntly: there is no obvious small parameter which facilitates an expan- sion about a tractable model. In this paper, we promul- gate the existence of a weakly-coupled ‘dual’ description Pseudo-Gap of a particularly exotic region of the phase diagram. This description paves the way for controlled calculations of arXiv:cond-mat/9803086 v1 8 Mar 1998 experimentally measurable quantities. DSC Before plunging into our exegesis of this dual descrip- AF tion and its consequences, let us briefly review the phe- nomena which we wish to explain. The phase diagram as X a function of temperature T and doping x (the nature of the doping varies from material to material, but is gener- ally believed to be proportional to the effective hole con- Fig. 1: Schematic phase diagram of a high-temperature superconductor as a function of doping x and tempera- centration in each CuO2 layer) is indicated schematically in Fig. 1. Best understood and in many cases very well ture T . characterized are the undoped (x = 0) materials, which are insulating antiferromagnets (AFs) below the N´eel Recent studies have revealed puzzling behavior temperature TN . At moderate dopings (0.1 < x < 0.3) in the underdoped region between the AF and ∗ and low temperatures (T <Tc(x)), superconductivity∼ ∼ SC. Below the high-temperature dotted line (T (x)) occurs. For many phenomenological purposes the super- in Fig. 1, angle-resolved photoemission (ARPES),6,7 conducting phase is adequately described by the same transport,8 NMR,9,10 optical conductivity,11,12 and other Ginzburg-Landau and London theory standard for con- measurements2 indicate a dramatic reduction of low- ventional superconductors (SCs).3 One important dis- energy (single-)electronic and spin degrees of freedom. 1 Furthermore, the ability of ARPES measurements to re- spin-ful) quanta we call nodons. In the dual variables, solve wavevector dependence exposes an angular varia- the fundamental Lagrangian of our model is tion similar to that of d-wave quasiparticles in the SCing † z x phase6,7. This portion of the phase diagram is commonly = ψ1[i∂t vF τ i∂x v∆τ i∂y]ψ1 + (1 2, x y) L κµ − −2 ↔ ↔ called the pseudo-gap region. The ultimate nature of the + (∂µ iaµ)Φ VΦ( Φ ) corresponding underlying quantum ground state is an in- 2 | − | − | | −1 1 2 2 triguing theoretical puzzle, and a principal subject of this +aµǫµνλ∂ν (Aλ κ Jλ)+ (ej b ) − λ 2κ − paper. 0 +2λJ0 + N . (1.1) To proceed, we look to the experiments for guidance. L They indicate three types of excitations which are im- In the sections which follow, we will elucidate the physics portant below the dotted line in Fig. 1: the ordering of this Lagrangian in some detail, so we restrict our- fields related to antiferromagnetism and superconductiv- selves, in this introduction, to a whirlwind tour. The † ity, and d-wave quasiparticles near the four nodes. Con- fields ψj , ψj , j = 1, 2 are the nodon creation and anni- spicuously absent from this list are electrons and holes at hilation operators at the two antipodal pairs of nodes. an ordinary Fermi-surface. The physics of this omission Jλ is a bilinear in the nodon operators which has an in- is that pairing occurs (due to unspecified strong interac- terpretation in the d-wave superconducting phase as the tion physics) at the high energy T ∗(x). Given these in- quasiparticle electrical 3-current. Φ is the complex scalar gredients, one natural theoretical strategy is to attempt field representing the vortices, and aµ is the gauge field to approach the pseudo-gap state by increasing x from which is dual to the phase of the superconducting or- the AF at half-filling. Many researchers have already der parameter. The term proportional to λ describes the attempted this approach, but it remains inconclusive. effects of particle/hole asymmetries, and the N term de- We, instead, tackle the pseudo-gap state from the scribes the coupling of the nodons to antiferromagnetism,L right, literally. To do this, we must contemplate which we will return to presently. quantum-disordering the d-wave superconductor. For A remarkable result of calculations with Eq. 1.1 is that simplicity, we will assume for the moment a purely two- gapless nodons survive the quantum disordering of the dimensional model of a single CuO2 plane. We imagine SC! The nodons are like the smile of the Cheshire cat: that pairing establishes a local superconducting d-wave the dx2−y2 order parameter is gone, but the nodes re- order parameter ∆(~x, t) = ∆ eiϕ, where ~x is the two- main. The consequent Nodal Liquid (NL) described by dimensional coordinate and|t |is time. The experimen- Eq. 1.1 is a distinct and novel zero-temperature quan- tal properties of the pseudo-gap state can be interpreted tum phase with a number of fascinating properties. For as an indication that ∆ is large in this region, so that simplicity, consider first a hypothetical NL phase at half- quantum fluctuations of| the| phase of the order-parameter filling in the absence of impurities. The possibility of AF ϕ must be responsible for the lack of off-diagonal long- ordering will be included later via N . We hypothesize range-order ( ∆ = 0), even as T 0. The important that antiferromagnetism might beL avoided and the NL long-distanceh dephasingi is accomplished→ by vortex loops achieved in a half-filled square lattice model by adjusting and lines, around which ϕ winds by 2π. To destroy an attractive nearest-neighbor interaction and second- the long-range correlations in ∆, we must± unbind vortex neighbor electron hopping amplitude. The NL is a nomi- loops of arbitrarily large size, just as vortex-antivortex nally insulating state, with non-zero gaps ∆1 and ∆2 for pairs unbind above the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition adding both individual electrons/holes and Cooper pairs, temperature in a two-dimensional superfluid. To imple- respectively. Gapless nodons with anisotropic ballistic ment this unbinding, it is extremely helpful to use the dispersion (ω k), however, persist, and can carry both 2 + 1-dimensional duality13,14 relating an XY-model for spin and current.∼ With particle/hole symmetry (λ = 0 ∆ and a Ginzburg-Landau model with complex field Φ in Eq. 1.1), we expect power law ( 1/ x 4) spin cor- (“disorder parameter”) interacting with a gauge field a. relations at (0, 0), (π, π), (π, 0), and∼ symmetry-related| | The duality interchanges Cooper pairs and vortices, so points in the Brillouin zone. Scaling arguments lead us that the desired quantum disordered d-wave state is the to expect a weak dissipative dynamic contribution to the ordered (condensed) phase, Φ = 0, of the Ginzburg- conductivity which, in the presence of particle/hole sym- Landau theory. The imaginary-timeh i 6 effective action for metry, would vary as Re σ(ω,T = 0) ω6. Nodons ∼ 2 this dual theory is nothing but the Ginzburg-Landau free also contribute a quadratic specific heat Cnodon aT . energy functional for a three-dimensional superconductor Despite the similarity of the nodons to d-wave quasipar-∼ at finite-temperature. ticles, the single-particle spectral function is predicted to The fate of the d-wave quasiparticles in this construc- show a gap at the Fermi energy in the NL.