Self-Deception Within the Predictive Coding Framework

Self-Deception Within the Predictive Coding Framework

Self-deception within the predictive coding framework Iuliia Pliushch Mainz 2016 Table of contents Table of contents __________________________________________________ ii List of figures ____________________________________________________ iv List of tables _____________________________________________________ v Introduction ______________________________________________________ 1 1 Review: Desiderata for the concept of self-deception _________________ 4 1.1 Motivation debate: intentionalists vs. deflationary positions __________ 5 1.1.1 Intentionalist positions ________________________________________________ 5 1.1.2 Deflationary positions _______________________________________________ 24 1.1.3 Constraints on a satisfactory theory of self-deception ______________________ 51 1.2 “Product” or kind of misrepresentation debate ____________________ 62 1.2.1 Belief (Van Leeuwen) vs. avowal (Audi) ________________________________ 66 1.2.2 Belief decomposed: regarding-as-true-stances (Funkhouser) and degrees of belief (Lynch, Porcher) ___________________________________________________________ 69 1.2.3 Dispositionalism (Bach, Schwitzgebel) vs. constructivism (Michel) __________ 73 1.2.4 Pretense (Gendler) __________________________________________________ 76 1.2.5 Emotional micro-takings (Borge) ______________________________________ 78 1.2.6 Self-deceptive process: belief formation or narrative construction? ___________ 82 1.2.7 Non-doxastic conception of self-deception _______________________________ 88 1.3 Classic psychological experiments testing self-deception _____________ 96 1.3.1 Questionnaires testing self-deception: SDQ (Gur & Sackeim) and BIDR (Paulhus) 97 1.3.2 Two classic testing paradigms ________________________________________ 106 1.3.3 Does motivation influence quantity or quality of processing? _______________ 113 1.3.4 Inference from the subpersonal to the personal level ______________________ 116 2 Self-deception – goal-directed subpersonal hypothesis testing ________ 122 2.1 Simplifying an explanandum for a theory of self-deception _________ 122 2.1.1 Role of intuitions for explanations of self-deception ______________________ 123 2.1.2 Explanandum: behavior and phenomenology ____________________________ 127 2.1.3 Tension as an epistemic feeling with an indicator function _________________ 136 2.2 The building blocks: Motivation? Process? Product? ______________ 147 2.2.1 Motivation: goal representations ______________________________________ 150 2.2.2 Process: subpersonal hypothesis-testing ________________________________ 161 2.2.3 Properties of self-deceptive misrepresentations __________________________ 175 3 Functions of self-deception ___________________________________ 182 3.1 Non-evolutionary theories of self-deception ______________________ 183 3.1.1 Cognitive dissonance _______________________________________________ 184 3.1.2 Stability of the self-concept __________________________________________ 190 3.1.3 Self-esteem – a central feature of the self-concept ________________________ 198 3.1.4 Terror-management theory __________________________________________ 211 3.2 Evolutionary theories of self-deception __________________________ 218 3.2.1 Constraints on the validity of an evolutionary psychological explanation _____ 219 3.2.2 Trivers’ evolutionary theory of self-deception ___________________________ 225 3.2.3 Criticism of Trivers’ evolutionary theory of self-deception _________________ 250 3.3 Comparison of the adaptation, byproduct and exaptation explanations 261 4 Modelling self-deception ______________________________________ 265 4.1 Connectionist models _________________________________________ 266 4.2 FTL model: Error minimization account ________________________ 272 4.3 Types of Bayesian explanations and their implications _____________ 277 4.4 Conceptual tools extracted from the predictive coding approach _____ 287 4.5 Application of conceptual tools extracted from predictive coding to self- deception _________________________________________________________ 312 5 Conclusion _________________________________________________ 331 6 References _________________________________________________ 333 I would very much like to thank both my supervisors for their impeccable guidance and the Barbara-Wengeler foundation for more than generous financial support, without which this work might not have seen the light of day. List of figures Figure 1. Bermúdez: types of self-deceptive intentions. ....................................................................................... 17 Figure 2. Talbott: characterization of divisionist approaches to self-deception ................................................. 19 Figure 3. Talbott: Defining assumptions for an ideally coherent self ................................................................. 21 Figure 4. Talbott: biased mechanism for selecting hypotheses ........................................................................... 22 Figure 5. Different kinds of motivation ................................................................................................................. 56 Figure 6. Schwitzgebel: phenomenological, dispositional account of belief ....................................................... 74 Figure 7. Drayson: kinds of explanations ............................................................................................................ 119 Figure 8. Phenomenology of SD. ......................................................................................................................... 134 Figure 9. Ingredients of a personal level explanation of self-deception. .......................................................... 149 Figure 10. Andersen: processes determining knowledge use. ........................................................................... 153 Figure 11. Balcetis: influence of motivation on cognition. ................................................................................ 163 Figure 12. Balcetis: limitation criteria for SD. .................................................................................................... 163 Figure 13. Price & Norman: multidimensional space of mental processes ...................................................... 167 Figure 14. Cognitive dissonance paradigm ......................................................................................................... 188 Figure 15. Scott-Kakures: sources of cognitive dissonance ................................................................................ 189 Figure 16. Taylor: information division .............................................................................................................. 201 Figure 17. Sedikides: kinds of self-evaluation motivation .................................................................................. 206 Figure 18. Kinds of self-esteem ............................................................................................................................ 211 Figure 19. The notion of a module. ..................................................................................................................... 220 Figure 20. Kinds of environmental constraints .................................................................................................. 222 Figure 21. Trivers: self-driven and imposed self-deception ............................................................................... 227 Figure 22. Trivers: categories of self-deception. .................................................................................................. 229 Figure 23. Trivers: detection-deception circle ..................................................................................................... 233 Figure 24. Byrne & Kurland: Simplest Non-Trivial Modular Mind. ................................................................ 238 Figure 25. Von Hippel & Trivers: Information processing biases. ................................................................... 246 Figure 26. Van Leeuwen: categorization of self-deception. ............................................................................... 253 Figure 27. Van Leeuwen: Essential features and they function in practical rationality .................................. 255 Figure 28. Van Leeuwen: Facilitators of self-deception...................................................................................... 256 Figure 29. Friedrich: How motivation could influence hypothesis testing. ..................................................... 273 Figure 30. Trope & Liberman: hypothesis testing model .................................................................................. 275 Figure 31. Carhart-Harris & Friston: Relationship between DMN, Attention and Sensory areas. ............... 308 Figure 32. Phenomenology of the self-deceiver .................................................................................................. 316 Figure 33. Relationships between phenomenal models. .................................................................................... 318 List of tables Table 1. Hypothetical examples of self-deception .................................................................................................. 3 Table 2. Davidson: weakness of the warrant vs. weakness of the will. ................................................................ 8 Table 3. Davidson: self-deception vs. wishful thinking. .......................................................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    365 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us