OTA 2017 Complex Knee Dislocations Objectives

OTA 2017 Complex Knee Dislocations Objectives

OTA 2017 Complex Knee Dislocations Objectives: 1) Understand emergent treatment and associated injuries 2) Review acute, staged, and delayed treatment options for knee dislocation 3) Understand complications and long-term results of knee dislocations Description: Participants will understand emergent management as well as options of acute staged and delayed treatment of this complex injury. We will also review complications and expected long-term outcomes. Outline: 1) Emergent treatment – Frank Avilucea – 15 min Incidence and associated injuries NVstatus – ABIs, when to get CTA Compartment Syndrome Irreducible and open 2) Acute Treatment –Bill Obremskey 15 minutes Indications Associated injuries Technique and results of acute repair and reconstruction 3) Early Treatment –JD Adams– 15 minutes Repair sides and scope reconstruction of ACL/PCL Technique Indications and results 4) Staged Treatment – Jim Stannard – 15 minutes Initial treatment PCL and sides When to use ex fix Scope ACL and MUA Results 5) Case Discussions 30 mintes “Acute treatment of Knee Dislocations” William T Obremskey MD MPH MMH OTA October 2017 I. Why treat knee dislocation different than an elbow dislocation? a. Stabilize the bone b. Repair the ligaments c. Move the joint II. AAOS KD Study Group 2009 - Recommendations a. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the ACL and PCL should be done, rather than repair b. Primary open reconstruction rather than repair of the LCL/PLC should be done c. Based on: i. Stannard JP. Am J Sports Med. 2005;3:881-888 ii. Stannard. AOS for Sports Med, 2005 iii. Levy BA, Am J Sports Med. 2010, 38:804 iv. Surgeries were staged and delayed – Levy et al. mean 132 days III. Repair Works a. Martinek V. American Journal of Knee Surgery. 13(2):74-82, 2000. b. Weaver JK. Clin Orthop. 1985;91:185-191. c. Chhabra A. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume. 87 Suppl 1(Pt 1):1-21, 2005 Mar. d. Strand T. Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery. 125(4):217-21, 2005 May. e. Owens et al. J. of Orthopedic Trauma Feb. 2007 IV. Owens et al. J. of Orthopedic Trauma Feb. 2007 a. 25 patients w/ multiligament tears b. all repaired, even midsubstance tears c. 5/25 (20%) needed MUA or lysis of adhesions d. No late loosening V. Vanderbilt data a. 47 pts (81% male, average age 33 years, range 19 to 56) 12 months F/U b. 26 KD III – 55%, 14 KD IV – 30%, 7 KD V - 15% c. IKDC mean 63.5 points (range 28-100) d. 90% “normal or near normal” e. ROM mean 124 degrees f. KT-1000 > 5 mm 7 (33%) patients g. No revision for loosening h. 48% patients Tegner Score > 7/10 VI. Complications a. Stiffness 4/47 - 8.5 % i. MUA – 2/47 – 2.25 % ii. Lysis of Adhesions - 2/47 - 2.25 % b. Infection – 2/47- 4.25 % i. One with I&D and antibiotics ii. One due to rotational flap failure c. HO with surgery – 2/47 – 4.25% d. Late loosening and instability w/ Reoperation - 0% VII. Predictors of IKDC < 50 a. 6/8 medial and lateral meniscal injuries b. Not ISS c. 28 IKDC score had isolated injury d. One pt w/ 100 IKDC score had ISS > 40 VIII. Delayed or Scope treatment cannot treat all associated injuries a. PT avulsion b. Fractures c. Bucket handle meniscus d. Extruded meniscus e. MCL “flipped” avulsions f. Menisco-capsular rim tears Staged Treatment: Treatment of Complex Knee Dislocations Symposium John D. Adams, Jr. MD OTA Annual Meeting 2017 1. Staged Treatment Approach Outline • Why consider a staged approach • Benefits and downsides to a staged protocol • Compass Hinge External Fixation • Static External Fixation 2. Common Complications to Consider • Infection Rate- reported to be as high as 12.5% • Arthrofibrosis- 40% need treatment • Continued instability- 40% 3. Typical Staged Protocol • Early Stage- 3-4 weeks after injury o Reconstruct PCL and Corners o Treat Menisci o Hinged Ex-Fix • Late Stage- 6-8 weeks later o ACL Reconstruction o Removal of Hinged Ex-fix o MUA 4. Why Consider a Staged Approach? • Early Stage o Allows soft tissue recovery o ROM • Late Stage o Shortens initial surgery o “Free” MUA and Lysis of Adhesions o Specific rehab 5. Staged Approach: addresses complications • Infection Rate o Allows soft tissue to recover and shortens OR time • Arthrofibrosis o MUA at 6 weeks • Instability o Specific Rehab and Hinged Exfix 6. Compass Hinge Exfix • When to use it? • Results- Stannard et al. JBJS 2014 7. Static Spanning External Fixation • When to apply? .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us