University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 24 Issue 2 Selected Papers from New Ways of Article 6 Analyzing Variation (NWAV 46) 10-15-2018 Why the Long FACE?: Ethnic Stratification and ariationV in the London Diphthong System Shivonne M. Gates Queen Mary University of London Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl Recommended Citation Gates, Shivonne M. (2018) "Why the Long FACE?: Ethnic Stratification and ariationV in the London Diphthong System," University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: Vol. 24 : Iss. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol24/iss2/6 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol24/iss2/6 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Why the Long FACE?: Ethnic Stratification and ariationV in the London Diphthong System Abstract This study attempts to challenge the monolithic representation of race and ethnicity in multicultural contexts in the UK. Whilst there are various descriptions of ethnic varieties of British English (e.g., Kirkham 2012, Rampton 2006, Sebba 1993, Sharma 2011), our understanding of race and ethnicity in the UK and its role in language variation and change is still rather limited. Recent work on Multicultural London English (MLE) found some evidence of ethnic stratification; for example, non-Anglo" " boys were often more likely to use innovative linguistic features (Cheshire et al. 2011). Despite this, MLE is described as an "ethnically-neutral variable repertoire" (Cheshire et al. 2013). In order to shed light on the dynamics of race and ethnicity in multicultural contexts, the present study uses qualitative and quantitative methods to examine a different diverse inner London adolescent community. Data were gathered at Riverton Secondary School, a multi-ethnic school in a diverse borough of East London, from 27 Year Ten students (aged 14-15). Sociophonetic analyses of FACE and PRICE reveal stark gender differences in vowel production, as well as some ethnic stratification. orF example, White British girls have much longer FACE trajectories, as well as a lower, more centralised onset. However, the picture is complicated by the fact that adolescents’ constructions of ethnic identity are inextricably linked to friendship networks, orientation to school, and notions of localness and Britishness. Results complement previous findings in London, but also shine an important light on the relevance of ethnicity in multicultural British contexts. This working paper is available in University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol24/iss2/6 Why the Long FACE?: Ethnic Stratification and Variation in the London Diphthong System Shivonne M. Gates∗ 1 Introduction It has been well documented that London English has undergone many changes in recent years (e.g. Cheshire et al. 2011, Fox 2007, Tollfree 1999). Rather than the traditional Cockney, young, working- class, inner-city East Londoners are now more likely to speak Multicultural London English (MLE) (Cheshire et al. 2008). This term is used to capture an array of changes across multiple levels of language, such as phonology, morphosyntax, and pragmatics. The London diphthong system has not been immune to these changes, and it has been suggested that the London diphthong shift described by Wells (1982) is reversing (Kerswill et al. 2008). This paper presents an ongoing analysis of the diphthong system in London English, investigating whether the changes noted by Kerswill et al. (2008) have stabilised, continued, or reversed. Locating the source of change in London English is a complex issue. It has been suggested that language change in London is a consequence of group second language acquisition and ethnically- diverse friendship networks (cf. Cheshire et al. 2008, 2011, 2013). Language contact is also likely to have impacted language change in London. However, with such a diverse pool of contact languages, combined with a high proportion of first and second generation foreign nationals, it is an empirical and theoretical challenge to connect changes to one or a group of languages. Additionally, there is limited understanding of the ethnic variation in MLE. MLE has been described as an “ethnically neutral variable repertoire” (Cheshire et al. 2013:3), findings that are similar to other urban centres across Europe, where it has been repeatedly claimed that emerging linguistic repertoires in multicultural communities are ethnically neutral (e.g., Quist 2008, Svendsen and Royneland 2008, Wiese 2009). Although there is evidence of ethnic stratification in the MLE data, ethnicity was never a significant social factor, so ethnic variation was presented as incidental. This paper explores these issues by combining ethnographic knowledge of an adolescent com- munity in East London with multivariate analysis of acoustic vowel measurements. The acoustic analysis of diphthongs sheds light on the trajectory and source of change in London, whilst the ethnographic knowledge allows for a nuanced understanding of the dynamics of ethnic variation in a multicultural community. 2 Diphthongs in London: A Brief Overview In his discussion of London English, Wells (1982) describes a diphthong system that has undergone a chain shift. The onset position of fronting, closing diphthongs shifted down and back in a counter- clockwise direction, and backing, closing diphthongs shifted down and forward in a clockwise di- rection, resulting in the vowel space depicted on the left in Figure 1. Recent research, however, indicates that this shift is in reversal. Fox (2007) conducted an auditory analysis of vowel produc- tion in White British and Bangladeshi adolescents in Tower Hamlets. She was the first to find that FACE had become more narrow, and she noted three innovative, fronted and raised variants that were sometimes monophthongised. She also noted that PRICE was fronting so that the onset now over- lapped with TRAP. She did also find evidence of more “traditional” FACE and PRICE diphthongs, that were more in line with the vowels described by Wells (1982) and shown on the left in Figure 1. The data for this project was collected in 2001-2. Three years later, from 2004-7, data were collected in neighboring borough Hackney as part of the Linguistic Innovators project (Kerswill et al. 2007). There was now little evidence of the traditional, shifted diphthongs described by Wells (1982). Instead, Kerswill et al. (2008) found further evidence that FACE had become raised and ∗I would like to thank audiences at UKLVC 2017, NWAV46, and Glasgow University Laboratory of Pho- netics for their comments and assistance with this paper. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 24.2, 2018 40 SHIVONNE M. GATES Figure 1: Traditional and innovative London vowels, from Kerswill et al. (2008). with a shortened trajectory, PRICE had centralised and lowered, MOUTH had lowered, and GOAT had raised and backed. This is depicted on the right in Figure 1. It seemed that the London diphthong shift was reversing. Theoretically, work on MLE has had some important implications for processes of language change in London. For diphthongs, as well as other linguistic variables like variation in past tense BE, TH- and DH- variation, and the use of new pronoun man, speakers with the most ethnically- diverse friendship networks were most likely to use innovative variants. In addition, rather than following the expected channels of acquiring language through the caregiver, Cheshire et al. (2011) describe a process of group second language acquisition where speakers with a foreign heritage language at home learn the dominant language (English) from their peers once in school. Language contact is likely to have had an impact, but this has been difficult to discern due to the great number of different heritage languages spoken in London. As noted above, later work describes MLE as an “ethnically-neutral variable repertoire” (Cheshire et al. 2013; 3). But a closer look at findings does show some evidence ethno-linguistic variation. For example, Anglo (that is, White British), girls lagged behind their peers in the use of innovative vowel variants, and Afro-Caribbean boys were often the leaders in the use of innovative diphthongs (Kerswill et al. 2008). Despite this, ethnicity is not explored in detail in the work on MLE: it is in- cluded in statistical models, but comes out insignificant, and it was beyond the scope of the projects to explore the dynamics of race and ethnicity further. Therefore, this paper attempts to further our understanding of language and ethnicity in a multicultural context. There are some key issues that emerge from this brief review of recent work in London. First, it raises questions about the trajectory of sound change in London. Second, it seems questionable as to whether MLE is truly “ethnically-neutral”. Finally, if ethnicity is socially-important in multicultural communities, then the role of ethnicity in language change in London needs further exploration. As such, this paper aims to answer the following research questions: (1) Are the FACE and PRICE vowels continuing along the same trajectory of change found by Kerswill et al. (2008)? (2) What role does ethnicity play in language variation and change in an ethnically-diverse ado- lescent community in East London? (3) Do answers to these questions have any implications for our understanding of processes of language change and variation in London? To answer these questions, this paper presents an acoustic analysis of FACE and PRICE. Previous research has shown changes in both onset position of FACE and PRICE, therefore F1 onset of FACE ETHNOLINGUISTIC VARIATION IN LONDON DIPHTHONGS 41 is examined in order to understand the degree to which FACE is raised, F2 onset position of PRICE is analysed to determine the degree of fronting of PRICE. 3 Methodology 3.1 The Field Site The field site for this study was situated in Newham, an inner-city East London borough.1 It is bor- dered by other ethnically-diverse inner-city boroughs Hackney and Tower Hamlets (where Cheshire et al.