Analysis of the Costs and Benefits of Alternative Solutions for Restoring Biodiversity

Analysis of the Costs and Benefits of Alternative Solutions for Restoring Biodiversity

ANALYSIS OF THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR RESTORING BIODIVERSITY Defra Competition Code: WC0758/CR0444 REFERENCES Appendix 7 to Final report to Defra - December 2010 . Hodder, KH; Douglas S; Newton, A; Bullock, JM; Scholefield, P.; Vaughan, R. Cantarello, E; Birch, J. Contact: Dr Kathy H. Hodder CCEEC, School of Conservation Sciences Talbot Campus Bournemouth University Talbot Campus Poole, Dorset BH12 5BB Tel: 01202 966784, Fax: 01202 965046 Mobile: 07905 161180 [email protected] Report to Defra, Appendix 7, K. Hodder, Bournemouth University 2010. 1 7. References Alexander, R. 2004. Reedbeds metadata v1.2 (supplied with Natural England 'reedbeds' GIS data; accessed from http://www.gis.naturalengland.org.uk/pubs/gis/GIS_register.asp) . Natural England, Peterborough. Anderson, B. J., P. R. Armsworth, F. Eigenbrod, C. D. Thomas, S. Gillings, A. Heinemeyer, D. B. Roy, and K. J. Gaston. 2009. Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities. Journal of Applied Ecology 46 :888-896. Anderson, P. 2010. Sustainable catchment management programme monitoring progress report - year 4 http://www.unitedutilities.com/Documents/scamp1.pdf. United Utilities. Anon. 2007. The Pumlumon Large Area Conservation Project – Progress Report. Montgomeryshire Wildlife Trust, Welshpool. Archer, D. R. 2007. The use of flow variability analysis to assess the impact of land use change on the paired Plynlimon catchments, mid-Wales. Journal of Hydrology 347 :487-496. Armstrong, A., J. Holden, P. Kay, B. Francis, M. Foulger, S. Gledhill, A. T. McDonald, and A. Walker. 2010. The impact of peatland drain-blocking on dissolved organic carbon loss and discolouration of water; results from a national survey. Journal of Hydrology 381 :112-120. Bailey, E., C. Faulkner, S. Hughes, and E. Lewis-Reddy. 2010. The Pumlumon project two year progress report 2008 - 2010. Montgomeryshire Wildlife Trust, Welshpool. Balmford, A., A. Rodrigues, M. Walpole, P. ten Brink, M. Kettunen, L. Braat, and R. de Groot. 2008. Review on the economics of biodiversity loss: scoping the science. Final report. European Commission. Benayas, J. M. R., A. C. Newton, A. Diaz, and J. M. Bullock. 2009. Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis. Science 325 :1121-1124. Bennett, R. M., R. B. Tranter, and R. J. P. Blaney. 2003. The value of countryside access: a contingent valuation survey of visitors to the Ridgeway National Trail in the United Kingdom. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46 :659- 671. Birch, J. N., A.C.; Alvarez Aquino C.; Cantarello E.;, Echeverría C.; Kitzberger T.; Schiappaccasse I.; Tejedor Garavito N. In press. Cost-effectiveness of dryland forest restoration evaluated by spatial analysis of ecosystem services. PNAS. Brenman, S. 2005. Rebuilding Biodiversity in the South West. Technical manual. The South West Wildlife Trusts, Bristol. Report to Defra, Appendix 7, K. Hodder, Bournemouth University 2010. 2 Brouwers, N. C. N., A.C.; Watts, K.; Bailey, S. 2010. Evaluation of buffer-radius modeling approaches used in forest conservation and planning. Forestry 83 :409- 421. Bullock, C. H., D. A. Elston, and N. A. Chalmers. 1998. An application of economic choice experiments to a traditional land use - deer hunting and landscape change in the Scottish Highlands. Journal of Environmental Management 52 :335-351. Bulman, C. R. B., N. A. D., Warren, M. S. , editor. 2008. Conservation Review, 2000- 2008. Butterfly Conservation, Wareham. Calder, I. R., I. Reid, T. Nisbet, A. Armstrong, J. C. Green, and G. Parkin. 2002. Study of the potential impacts on water resources of proposed afforestation. Defra contracts CWO 633-I and CWO 633-II. Trees and Drought Project on Lowland England - TaDPoLE. Loughborough University, Loughborough. Cantarello, E., A. C. Newton, and R. A. Hill. submitted. Potential effects of future land- use change on regional carbon stocks in the UK. Environmental Science & Policy. Carey, P. D., S. Wallis, P. M. Chamberlain, A. Cooper, B. A. Emmett, L. C. Maskell, T. McCann, J. Murphy, L. R. Norton, B. Reynolds, W. A. Scott, I. C. Simpson, S. M. Smart, and J. M. Ullyett. 2008. Countryside Survey: UK Results from 2007 (CEH Project Number: C03259). NERC/Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford. Carroll, Z. L., S. B. Bird, B. A. Emmett, B. Reynolds, and F. L. Sinclair. 2004a. Can tree shelterbelts on agricultural land reduce flood risk? Soil Use and Management 20 :357-359. Carroll, Z. L., B. Reynolds, B. A. Emmett, F. L. Sinclair, C. Ruiz de Ona, and P. Williams. 2004b. The effect of stocking density on soil in upland Wales. Final report. Countryside Council for Wales contract science report no. 630. CCW contract no. FC 73-02-280. CEH project no. C02448NEW. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bangor. Catchpole, R. D. J. 2006. Planning for Biodiversity – opportunity mapping and habitat networks in practice: a technical guide. English Nature Research Reports, No 687. CEH. 2006. The Great Fen Project presentation (24/07/06), provided by C. Gerrard 19/05/10. Chan, K. M. A., M. R. Shaw, D. R. Cameron, E. C. Underwood, and G. C. Daily. 2006. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. Plos Biology 4:2138-2152. Chhetri, P., and C. Arrowsmith. 2008. GIS-based modelling of recreational potential of nature-based tourist destinations. Tourism Geographies 10 :233-257. Christie, M., I. Fazey, R. Cooper, T. Hyde, A. Deri, L. Hughes, G. Bush, L. Brander, A. Nahman, W. de Lange, and B. Reyers. 2008. An evaluation of economic and non- economic techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity to people in Report to Defra, Appendix 7, K. Hodder, Bournemouth University 2010. 3 developing countries. Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth. Christie, M., N. Hanley, B. Garrod, T. Hyde, N. Lyons, A. Bergmann, and S. Hynes. 2006. Valuing forest recreation activities. Final phase 2 report. Report to the Forestry Commission. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh. Collingwood Environmental Planning 2008. Thames Gateway ecosystem services assessment using green grids and decision support tools for sustainability. Supporting the development of a strategy for the Kent Thameside green grid using ecosystem services. Strategic study report. Project code NR0109. Defra, London. Dawson, J., and P. Smith. 2007 Carbon losses from soil and its consequences for land- use management. Science of the Total Environment 382 165–190. de Groot, R. S., R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen. 2009. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity. DECC. 2008. Greenhouse gas policy evaluation and appraisal in government departments. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London. DECC. 2009a. Carbon appraisal in UK policy appraisal: a revised approach. A brief guide to the new carbon values and their use in economic appraisal. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London. DECC. 2009b. Carbon valuation in UK policy appraisal: a revised approach. Department of Energy and Climate Change, London. Defra. 2009. Biodiversity indicators in your pocket 2009. Measuring progress towards halting biodiversity loss. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London. Dramstad, W. E., M. S. Tveit, W. J. Fjellstad, and G. L. A. Fry. 2006. Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning 78 :465-474. Edwards, P. N., and J. M. Christie. 1981. Yield models for forest management. Forestry Commission booklet 48. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh. EFTEC. 2006a. Valuing our natural environment final report - Annexes. NR0103. EFTEC, London. Eftec. 2006b. Valuing our natural environment final report. NR0103. EFTEC, London. EFTEC. 2010. Valuing environmental impacts: practical guidelines for the use of value transfer in policy and project appraisal. Technical report. Submitted to Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Economics for the Environment Consultancy, London. Report to Defra, Appendix 7, K. Hodder, Bournemouth University 2010. 4 Eftec, and Just Ecology 2005a. England's ecosystem services. Final report, 15 July 2005, submitted to English Nature. Economics for the Environment Consultancy, Just Ecology, London, Berkeley. EFTEC, and Just Ecology. 2005b. England's ecosystem services. Final report, 15 July 2005, submitted to English Nature. Economics for the Environment Consultancy, Just Ecology, London, Berkeley. Eigenbrod, F., B. J. Anderson, P. R. Armsworth, A. Heinemeyer, S. F. Jackson, M. Parnell, C. D. Thomas, and K. J. Gaston. 2009. Ecosystem service benefits of contrasting conservation strategies in a human-dominated region. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 276 :2903-2911. Eigenbrod, F., P. R. Armsworth, B. J. Anderson, A. Heinemeyer, S. Gillings, D. B. Roy, C. D. Thomas, and K. J. Gaston. 2010. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology 47 :377-385. Environment Agency, Huntingdonshire District Council, Middle Level Commissioners, Natural England, C. Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Northamptonshire and Peterborough,, and LDA Design. 2010. Great Fen masterplan. Environment Group. 2004. An economic assessment of the costs and benefits of Natura 2000 sites in Scotland. Final report. Scottish Executive, Edinburgh. Fisher, B., K. Turner, M. Zylstra, R. Brouwer, R.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us