Genetics of Obesity in Adult Adoptees and Their Biological Siblings BMJ: First Published As 10.1136/Bmj.298.6666.87 on 14 January 1989

Genetics of Obesity in Adult Adoptees and Their Biological Siblings BMJ: First Published As 10.1136/Bmj.298.6666.87 on 14 January 1989

Genetics of obesity in adult adoptees and their biological siblings BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.298.6666.87 on 14 January 1989. Downloaded from Thorkild I A Sorensen, R Arlen Price, Albert J Stunkard, Fini Schulsinger Abstract study requires separation ofgenetic and environmental An adoption study of genetic effects on obesity influences. This means separation of the child from the in adulthood was carried out in which adoptees natural parents shortly after birth, negligible effect on separated from their natural parents very early in the trait at issue of the prenatal and postnatal environ- life were compared with their biological full and ments shared with the natural mother, and rearing half siblings reared by their natural parents. The of the child independent of the natural parents by adoptees represented four groups who by sampling biologically unrelated adoptive parents who are from a larger population were categorised as either selected without regard to the trait at issue. These thin, medium weight, overweight, or obese. Weight requirements generally appear to have been met in the and height were obtained for 115 full siblings of 57 Danish adoptee population.4 1718 adoptees and for 850 half siblings of 341 adoptees. In This study was based on the 5455 adoptions granted full siblings body mass index (kg/m2) significantly in Copenhagen. Current addresses of 4643 adoptees increased with weight of the adoptees. Body mass still living in Denmark were obtained from the local index of the half siblings showed a steady but weaker population registers, which since 1923 have filed increase across the four weight groups of adoptees. names and addresses of every person in Denmark from There were no significant interactions with sex ofthe birth to death or emigration. The adoptees were mailed adoptees, sex ofthe siblings, or (for the half siblings) a questionnaire asking about current height, weight, sex of the common parent. In contrast with the and other health issues, and 3651 (79%) replied.'4 Data findings in half siblings and (previously) the natural on height and weight were complete for 3580 adoptees parents there was a striking, significant increase in and were used to calculate the body mass index body mass index between full siblings of overweight (weight (kg)/(height (m))2) as a measure of fatness.'9 and obese adoptees. Mean age of the adoptees was 42 2 (SD 8-1) years, and The degree of fatness in adults living in the same 56% were women. environment appears to be influenced by genetic Four weight groups-namely, thin, medium weight, factors independent of sex, which may include overweight, and obese, each constituting 4% of the polygenic as well as major gene effects on obesity. sample-were selected from among 3580 adoptees for further study. To minimise possible bias due to the Introduction influence ofage and sex on body mass index selection of the four groups proceeded on the basis of ranked body Fatness runs in families,' 4 and the evidence for a mass index values within 5 x 2 age and sex strata. The genetic contribution to this tendency comes from thin group consisted of those between the lowest four several types of studies.5 These include fitting genetic centiles, the medium weight group those closest to the http://www.bmj.com/ models to the familial correlations,6 studies of twins, median, the overweight group those between the 92nd and studies comparing adoptees and the offspring of and 96th centiles, and the obese group those above the adoptive parents.6 8`1 None, however, has excluded the 96th centile. Characteristics of the 540 selected confounding due to environmental effects. Two recent adoptees have been described. 14 studies of adult adoptees and their natural parents'4 15 further evidence. The were have provided findings IDENTIFICATION AND ASCERTAINMENT OF SIBLINGS Department of Medicine, compatible with additive polygenic effects, but major Hvidovre University gene influences could not be excluded. Furthermore, By means of the regional population registers we Hospital, Copenhagen, in contrast with the family studies,'46 these studies traced 506 (94%) natural mothers and 418 (77%) on 1 October 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. Denmark suggested a stronger genetic relation between women natural fathers and identified 210 biological ftill sib- Thorkild I A Sorensen, than between men. The studies, however, were limited lings of the adoptees, 709 maternal half siblings, and DRMED, chiefphysician owing to difficulty in ascertaining parental fatness and 649 paternal half siblings. Follow up of the siblings by changes over time in environmental effects. means of the registers showed that 164 full siblings, Department of Psychiatry, 610 maternal half siblings, and 544 paternal half University of Pennsylvania, We report a new type of study, which compares the current body mass index of adult adoptees with that of siblings were currently living in Denmark. Philadelphia, USA A questionnaire requesting information on R Arlen Price, PHD, assistant their biological full and half siblings from whom they height professor were reared apart. Our findings allow further assess- and weight was sent to the biological siblings. Replies Albert J Stunkard, MD, ment of the genetic contribution. were received from 115 (70%) of the full siblings, 466 professor (76%) of the maternal half siblings, and 384 (71%) of the paternal half siblings. This corresponded to 57 full Psykologisk Institut, Subjects and methods sibships and 341 half sibships (255 maternal, 196 Kommunehospitalet, ADOPTEES paternal; 110 sibships included both types). Table I Copenhagen, Denmark Data on every completely non-familial adoption shows the distribution of siblings over the four weight Fini Schulsinger, DRMED, granted in Denmark between 1924 and 1947 were groups of adoptees. The ages of the siblings in the four professor transferred to the Danish Adoption Register at the weight groups were similar to those of the adoptees. and are known to show Correspondence to: Psykologisk Institut, Kommunehospitalet, in Copen- Self reported height weight Dr T I A Sorensen, hagen.'6 The records provide date offormal adoption, modest errors that increase with increasing body Department of Medicine B age of the child at transfer to the adoptive parents, the weight.20 The frequency of non-response depends in 259, Hvidovre University identity of the adoptive father and mother, and, when part on the degree of fatness as well as on various Hospital, DK-2650 known, the identities of the natural parents. Paternity related psychosocial characteristics (S Sonne-Holm Copenhagen, Denmark. was established by acknowledgment or biological tests, et al, unpublished observations). It seemed reasonable as required by Danish law. to assume that these limitations would make the results BrIledY7 1989;298:87-9(0 Valid assessment of genetic effects in an adoption conservative estimates of the true relations. BMJ VOLUME 298 14 JANUARY 1989 87 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS TABLE iI-Multiple regression analyses of body mass index ofsiblings (residuals after adjustment for age, weighted according to size of Having adjusted for the confounding effect ofage on sibship) on weight groups ofadoptees, sex ofadoptees, sex ofsiblings, body mass index, we assessed in hierarchical multiple and (for halfsiblings) sex ofcommon parent linear regression analyses the relation between body mass index of the siblings and weight groups of the Estimated Standard adoptees, sex of the siblings, sex of the adoptees, and, Variable coefficient error p Value for the half siblings, sex of the common parents. As the Pull siblings* body mass index of siblings is correlated,'3 we adjusted Intercept 3 09 1 27 0.02 BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.298.6666.87 on 14 January 1989. Downloaded from Weight groupt: the individual body mass index of siblings for size of Thin -4-59 0 97 0 0001 sibships (weighted by the reciprocal of the number of MNledium -3-98 0-92 0 0001 Overweight -2-73 0 97 0-006 siblings in the sibship and counting degrees of freedom Female adoptee 0 31 0-64 0-6 on the basis of number of sibships). Weight groups of Female sibling -0 13 0-64 0-8 adoptees (thin, medium, overweight, obese) were used Halfsiblings* Intercept 1-17 0-33 0-0004 either as qualitative variables or, in order to assess Weight groupt: trends across the weight groups, as a continuous Thin -1 04 0-34 0 003 variable. Statistical significance was evaluated by F test Medium -0-42 0 34 0-3 Overweight --0 39 0-32 0-3 and accepted at a two sided level of 0-05. Femaleadoptee 0 19 0-24 0-5 Female sibling -1-87 0-24 0 0001 Common mother 0-29 0-24 0-3 Results *Interaction effects within full and half sibling models (all non-significant) The mean body mass index of the full siblings not shown. increased with the weight group of the adoptees (thin tEach group estimated relative to obese group. 22-0, medium 22-7, overweight 23 8, obese 26 6) (figure). In the regression analysis the differences overweight 23 5, obese 23 6) (figure) and not signifi- between weight groups was significant (p<005) (table cant in the analysis of trends. Neither type of half II) and there was a highly significant trend across siblings showed the steep increase in body mass index weight groups (p<00001). The striking increase in between the overweight and obese groups seen in the body mass index of siblings between the overweight full siblings. and obese weight groups of adoptees was significant In the regression analysis of all half siblings together (p<O-Ol). the coefficients showed a steady increase in body mass The figure shows the average body mass index of index over the four weight groups of adoptees (table siblings for each of the four male-female combinations II); the trend across weight groups was significant of adoptees and their full siblings.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us