Accepted to the Astrophysical Journal on November 30, 2015 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 THE CHANDRA COSMOS LEGACY SURVEY: OPTICAL/IR IDENTIFICATIONS S. Marchesi1,2,3, F. Civano1,2, M. Elvis2, M. Salvato4, M. Brusa3,5, A. Comastri5, R. Gilli5, G. Hasinger6, G. Lanzuisi3,5, T. Miyaji7,8, E. Treister9, C.M. Urry1, C. Vignali3,5, G. Zamorani5, V. Allevato10, N. Cappelluti5, C. Cardamone11, A. Finoguenov10, R. E. Griffiths12, A. Karim13, C. Laigle14, S. M. LaMassa1, K. Jahnke15, P. Ranalli16, K. Schawinski17, E. Schinnerer18,19, J. D. Silverman20, V. Smolcic21, H. Suh6,2, B. Trakhtenbrot17 Accepted to the Astrophysical Journal on November 30, 2015 ABSTRACT We present the catalog of optical and infrared counterparts of the Chandra COSMOS-Legacy Survey, a 4.6 Ms Chandra program on the 2.2 deg2 of the COSMOS field, combination of 56 new overlapping observations obtained in Cycle 14 with the previous C-COSMOS survey. In this Paper we report the i, K, and 3.6 µm identifications of the 2273 X-ray point sources detected in the new Cycle 14 observations. We use the likelihood ratio technique to derive the association of optical/infrared (IR) counterparts for 97% of the X-ray sources. We also update the information for the 1743 sources detected in C-COSMOS, using new K and 3.6 µm information not available when the C-COSMOS analysis was performed. The final catalog contains 4016 X-ray sources, 97% of which have an op- tical/IR counterpart and a photometric redshift, while ≃54% of the sources have a spectroscopic redshift. The full catalog, including spectroscopic and photometric redshifts and optical and X-ray properties described here in detail, is available online. We study several X-ray to optical (X/O) prop- erties: with our large statistics we put better constraints on the X/O flux ratio locus, finding a shift towards faint optical magnitudes in both soft and hard X-ray band. We confirm the existence of a correlation between X/O and the the 2-10 keV luminosity for Type 2 sources. We extend to low luminosities the analysis of the correlation between the fraction of obscured AGN and the hard band luminosity, finding a different behavior between the optically and X-ray classified obscured fraction. 1 Yale Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, 260 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT 06520, USA 2 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 3 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universit`adi Bologna, viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, Italy 4 Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur extraterrestrische Physik, Giessen- bachstrasse 1, D-85748 Garching bei M¨unchen, Germany 5 INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, via Ranzani 1, 40127 Bologna, Italy 6 Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA 7 Instituto de Astronom´ıa sede Ensenada, Universidad Na- cional Aut´onoma de M´exico, Km. 103, Carret. Tijunana- Ensenada, Ensenada, BC, Mexico 8 University of California San Diego, Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093- 0424, USA 9 Universidad de Concepci´on, Departamento de Astronom´ıa, Casilla 160-C, Concepci´on, Chile arXiv:1512.01105v1 [astro-ph.GA] 3 Dec 2015 10 Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf H¨allstr¨omin katu 2a, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland 11 Department of Science, Wheelock College, Boston, MA 02215, USA 12 Physics & Astronomy Dept., Natural Sciences Division, University of Hawaii at Hilo, 200 W. Kawili St., Hilo, HI 96720, USA 13 Argelander-Institut f¨ur Astronomie, Universit¨at Bonn, Auf dem H¨ugel 71, D-53121 Bonn, Germany 14 Sorbonne Universit´e, UPMC Univ Paris 06, et CNRS, UMR 7095, IAP, 98b bd Arago, F-75014, Paris, France 15 Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Koenigstuhl 17, D- 69117 Heidelberg, Germany 16 Lund Observatory, P.O. Box 43, 22100 Lund, Sweden 17 Institute for Astronomy, Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland 18 Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Knigstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany vanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277- 19 NRAO, 1003 Lopezville Road, Socorro, NM 87801, USA 8583, Japan 21 20 Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Department of Physics, University of Zagreb, Bijeniˇcka Universe (WPI), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Ad- cesta 32, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia 2 Marchesi et al. 1. INTRODUCTION strategy, being layered in decreasing area and increasing It is widely believed that galaxies and their central su- depth (see Figure 16 in Civano et al. 2015b, hereafter permassive black holes (SMBH) undergo closely coupled Paper I), to obtain roughly similar numbers of detected evolution. SMBH masses in the nuclei of nearby galaxies sources spanning a broad range in redshift-luminosity space. At one extreme of this layer are wide/shallow sur- correlate with bulge luminosity and stellar velocity dis- 2 persion, with a very small scatter (Magorrian et al. 1998; veys like XBootes (9 deg ; Murray et al. 2005), Stripe Gebhardt et al. 2000; Ferrarese & Merrit 2000; Merloni 82X (31.2 deg2, LaMassa et al. 2013 and submitted), et al. 2010; McConnell & Ma 2013). Most SMBH - and XXL (50 deg2, Pierre et al. submitted) and 3XMM definitely the most massive ones - had to grow during (≃880 deg2, Rosen et al. submitted), which are designed an active accretion phase, when they would be visible to cover a large volume of the Universe and thus find rare as an active galactic nucleus (AGN), which implies that sources, i.e., high-luminosity and/or high-redshift AGN. most bulges had an active phase in their past. Galaxies At the opposite extreme are narrow/ultra-deep surveys and AGN show also coeval cosmic “downsizing”: more like the 4 Ms Chandra Deep Field South (CDF-S, 0.1 luminous AGN and more massive galaxies formed earlier deg2; Xue et al. 2011; other 3 Ms of Chandra time have (and therefore their number density peaks at higher red- already been granted in Chandra Cycle 15), which can shift) than less luminous AGN and less massive galaxies detect non-active galaxies, even at medium to high red- (Cowie et al. 1996). Massive galaxies exhibit a peak in shifts (Luo et al. 2011; Lehmer et al. 2012), and AGN star formation at z≃2 (Cimatti et al. 2006; Madau and at z>5 down to very faint limits, but have statistically Dickinson 2014), and SMBH growth peaks in the same small samples of sources at any redshift (e.g., Weigel et redshift range (z=2-3), as the quasar luminosity function al. 2015 showed that the CDF-S does not appear to con- (Hasinger et al. 2005; Silverman et al. 2008; Hasinger tain any AGN at z>5). 2008; Ueda et al. 2014; Aird et al. 2015; Miyaji et al. The Chandra COSMOS-Legacy project, i.e., the com- 2015). However, even if this common growth seems se- bination of the 1.8 Ms C-COSMOS survey (Elvis et al curely established, the causes of this trend remain largely 2009) with 2.8 Ms of new Chandra ACIS-I observations not understood (e.g. Merloni & Heinz 2008; Alexander (Paper I) is exploring a new region of the area versus & Hickox 2012). flux space, by using an unusually large total exposure The co-evolution of SMBH and galaxies can be studied time (4.6 Ms total) with respect to the observed area with sizable samples of AGN, both obscured and unob- (2.15 deg2). Chandra COSMOS-Legacy is deep enough scured, with sufficient multiwavelength data to disentan- (flux limit f≃2 × 10−16 erg s−1cm−2 in the 0.5-2 keV gle selection effects. To access the moderate luminos- band) to find obscured sources with no clear AGN sig- ity AGN that dominate the X-ray background requires a 2 natures in the optical spectra or spectral energy distri- deep moderate-area survey (≥ 1 deg in area, at sufficient 45 butions (SEDs) up to redshift z ≃6 and LX ≃10 erg depth to detect AGN up to z ∼6), on areas wide enough s−1; at the same time it is wide enough to have one of to measure large-scale structures and find rare objects. the largest samples of X-ray point-like sources (4016). Moreover, spectroscopic information deep enough to de- ∗ Moreover, the Chandra COSMOS-Legacy sources are tect faint sources (with L luminosities) even at z ≃3 is also bright enough to obtain almost complete optical also required. and near-infrared (near-IR) identifications of the X-ray X-ray data play an important role in the selection of sources (97% in C-COSMOS, Civano et al. 2012b, C12 AGN, because at these energies the contamination from hereafter): this extended follow-up is also due to the com- non-nuclear emission, mainly due to star-formation pro- prehensive nature of the Cosmic Evolutionary Survey cesses, is far less significant than in optical and infrared (COSMOS; Scoville et al. 2007) and to its multiwave- surveys (Donley et al. 2008, 2012; Stern et al. 2012; length photometric and spectroscopic database (Schin- Lehmer et al. 2012). X-ray surveys with Chandra and nerer et al. 2007; Sanders et al. 2007; Taniguchi et al. XMM-Newton are also very effective at selecting both 2007; Capak et al. 2007; Koekemoer et al. 2007; Zamo- unobscured and obscured AGN, including also a fraction jski et al. 2007; Lilly et al. 2007; Trump et al. 2007; of AGN in the Compton thick regime, i.e., with hydrogen 24 −2 Ilbert et al. 2009; McCracken et al.