Recurrent Selection for European Corn Borer Resistance in a Maize Synthetic James Robert Klenke Iowa State University

Recurrent Selection for European Corn Borer Resistance in a Maize Synthetic James Robert Klenke Iowa State University

Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1985 Recurrent selection for European corn borer resistance in a maize synthetic James Robert Klenke Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agricultural Science Commons, Agriculture Commons, and the Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Klenke, James Robert, "Recurrent selection for European corn borer resistance in a maize synthetic " (1985). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 8713. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/8713 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most adveinced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages in any manuscript may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to indicate this. 3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec­ tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hand comer and continu­ ing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or in black and white paper format.* 4. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or micro­ fiche but lack clarity on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, all photographs are available in black and white standard 35mm slide format.» *For more information about black and white slides or enlarged paper reproductions, please contact the Dissertations Customer Sendees Department- AW ATTTIM^ersHy INfieroffilms laternatiaDal 8604483 Klenke, James Robert RECURRENT SELECTION FOR EUROPEAN CORN BORER RESISTANCE IN A MAIZE SYNTHETIC Iowa State University PH.D. 1985 University Microfilms Internâtionâl SOO N Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 Recurrent selection for European corn borer resistance in a maize synthetic by James Robert Klenke A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department: Agronomy Major: Plant Breeding and Cytogenetics Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. In Charge of Major Work Signature was redacted for privacy. 'the Major Department Signature was redacted for privacy. For the Graduate College Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 1985 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 Review of Literature 2 Biology of the insect 4 Yield loss 7 Genetics 9 Recurrent selection 13 Estimation of genetic and inbreeding effects from recurrent selection 16 DIMBOA 21 'BS9* Chronology 27 1972 32 1975 33 1978 34 1980 35 Tables 36 Explanation of Dissertation Format 37 SECTION I. RECURRENT SELECTION FOR RESISTANCE TO EUROPEAN CORN BORER IN A CORN SYNTHETIC AND CORRELATED EFFECTS ON AGRONOMIC TRAITS 39 ABSTRACT 40 INTRODUCTION 42 MATERIALS AND METHODS 46 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 32 CONCLUSIONS 70 REFERENCES 73 SECTION II. HARVEST LOSS CAUSED BY SECOND-GENERATION EUROPEAN CORN BORER IN 'BS9' CORN SYNTHETIC 77 ABSTRACT 78 INTRODUCTION 80 MATERIALS AND METHODS 83 iii Page RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 87 CONCLUSIONS 98 REFERENCES 100 SECTION III. DISTRIBUTIONS FOR CORN BORER RATINGS OF S^ LINES FROM 'BS9' CORN SYNTHETIC AND GENE FREQUENCY CHANGES IN AGRONOMIC TRAITS 102 ABSTRACT 103 INTRODUCTION 105 MATERIALS AND METHODS 108 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 117 CONCLUSIONS 135 REFERENCES 137 SECTION IV. DISEASE RESISTANCE IN FIVE CYCLES OF 'BS9' CORN SYNTHETIC SELECTED FOR RESISTANCE TO TWO GENERATIONS OF EUROPEAN CORN BORER 140 ABSTRACT 141 INTRODUCTION 143 MATERIALS AND METHODS 150 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 154 CONCLUSIONS 163 REFERENCES 164 GENERAL SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION 168 GENERAL REFERENCES 173 iv Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 182 APPENDIX A: SECTION I TABLES 183 APPENDIX B: SECTION II TABLES 223 APPENDIX C: SECTION III TABLES 231 APPENDIX D: SECTION IV TABLES 242 APPENDIX E: CARBOFURAN (FURADAN) EFFECT 249 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION Damage to corn (2ea mays L«) plants by the European corn borer (ECB), Ostrinia nubilalis (Hubner), is evident in most farmers' fields every year. The extent of the damage, however, is extremely dependent on weather conditions and survival of the larvae. Because of the effects of climate, predators, and insect pathogens, predictions for the level of infestation from the first to subsequent generations in one year or from year-to-year are not reliable. The ECB normally has two generations per year in Iowa, and the generations coincide with two growth stages of the corn plant. First- generation resistance is expressed as leaf-feeding resistance before tassel emergence and second—generation resistance is expressed as sheath-collar feeding resistance after tassel emergence. With similar levels of infestation, the later generation usually causes more yield loss than does the earlier generation. Resistance to ECB in hybrid corn can reduce yield losses. Commercial com hybrids presently used have more resistance to ECB than did hybrids of earlier years, but available highly resistant germplasm has not been used extensively in breeding programs. Perhaps these resistant sources have not been used more extensively because their yield potential and other agronomic traits are inferior, and the resistance is not easily incorporated into existing inbred lines of corn. Resistance in com during the two growth stages to feeding by ECB is conditioned by several genes. Major genes for resistance seem of no importance in US Corn Belt germplasm, and there seems little relationship 2 between first-generation (leaf-feeding) and second-generation (sheath- collar feeding) resistance. Quantitative-genetics theory indicates that it should be possible to achieve a good level of resistance to ECB in a breeding population by using a recurrent selection scheme that recombines selected resistant lines from the population through several successive generations. A 10-line synthetic, BS9, was developed specifically to be used in a recurrent selection program to determine the extent to which resistance for the whole life of the plant could be improved. Specific objectives are: (1) to evaluate the progress that has been achieved in BS9 through four cycles of recurrent selection to improve the resistance for both first and second generations of the European corn borer; (2) to assess the worth of this resistance to prevent yield losses caused by the pest ; and (3) to determine what changes have occurred for other plant, ear, and grain traits. Review of Literature The release of BS9(CB)C4 to the hybrid seed industry (Russell and Guthrie, 1982) was a significant event to host-plant resistance investi­ gations because it was the first released Com Belt synthetic specifically developed and selected for resistance to the ECB for the whole life of the plant. Successful development of this synthetic has proved the reliabil­ ity of recent advances in artificial rearing techniques. Additionally, 3 this synthetic proves the efficacy of an recurrent selection procedure to improve the resistance of Corn Belt germplasm to ECB. An excellent source of resistance to both generations of ECB also helps alleviate a chronic void in available germplasm. The European com borer is the most damaging corn insect pest in the USA with annual losses now exceeding $200 million (Burkhardt, 1978, as cited by Burbutis et al., 1984). Utilization of hybrids resistant to ECB is the most economical method to control yield losses because no addi­ tional inputs are required. Breeding for resistance to prevent yield losses, therefore, is of great importance to the farm economy. A high level of infestation of an insect is essential for most host- plant resistance studies. Natural infestations, however, are too erratic and unpredictable to be dependable (Guthrie et al., 1965). Guthrie et al. (1971) stated that progress would be nil without artificial rearing techniques. Methods of laboratory production of egg masses have evolved slowly (Guthrie et al., 1965), and the most significant improvements in meridic or artificial diets for rearing large numbers of insects have been developed in the last 15 to 18 years (Guthrie and Dicke, 1972; Guthrie and Berry, 1979). Resistance to first-generation ECB has been easy to find (Guthrie and Dicke, 1972), whereas resistance to second generation is more difficult to find (Guthrie et al., 1971). In a survey of 114 corn inbreds, Pesho et al. (1965) found only one inbred, B52, with good resistance. Another resistant line to both first- and second-generation ECB, B86, has been recently released (Russell and Guthrie, 1979). Inbred B86 was developed by selecting and self-pollinating through several generations in progeny of the single cross B52 x Oh43 under high artificial infestations of both generations of ECB. The inbred contrib­ utes resistance to first-generation borer (from the Oh43 parent) and to second-generation borer (from the B52 parent) in single-cross hybrids (Guthrie et al., 1985b). B86 was the first inbred stock of Corn Belt origin known to combine into one genotype good resistance to the insect for the life of the plant (Russell and Guthrie, 1979). More recently, two other publicly released inbreds, SC213 and DE811, have displayed resistance to second-generation ECB (W. D. Guthrie, Corn Insects Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Ankeny, lA, 1984, personal communication).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    263 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us