This Is a Self-Archived Version of an Original Article. This Version May Differ from the Original in Pagination and Typographic Details

This Is a Self-Archived Version of an Original Article. This Version May Differ from the Original in Pagination and Typographic Details

This is a self-archived version of an original article. This version may differ from the original in pagination and typographic details. Author(s): Mangeloja, Esa Title: Religious Revival Movements and the Development of the Twentieth-century Welfare- state in Finland Year: 2019 Version: Published version Copyright: © 2019 the Authors Rights: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 Rights url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Please cite the original version: Mangeloja, E. (2019). Religious Revival Movements and the Development of the Twentieth- century Welfare-state in Finland. In K. Sinnemäki, A. Portman, J. Tilli, & R. Nelson (Eds.), On the Legacy of Lutheranism in Finland : Societal Perspectives (pp. 220-236). Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. Studia Fennica Historica, 25. https://oa.finlit.fi/site/books/10.21435/sfh.25/ On the Legacy of Lutheranism in Finland Societal Perspectives Edited by Kaius Sinnemäki, Anneli Portman, Jouni Tilli and Robert H. Nelson Finnish Literature Society Ü SKS Ü Helsinki Ü 2019 studia fennica historica 25 The publication has undergone a peer review. © 2019 Kaius Sinnemäki, Anneli Portman, Jouni Tilli, Robert H. Nelson and SKS License CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International Cover Design: Timo Numminen EPUB: Tero Salmén ISBN 978-951-858-135-5 (Print) ISBN 978-951-858-150-8 (PDF) ISBN 978-951-858-149-2 (EPUB) ISSN 0085-6835 (Studia Fennica. Print) ISSN 2669-9605 (Studia Fennica. Online) ISSN 1458-526X (Studia Fennica Historica. Print) ISSN 2669-9591 (Studia Fennica Historica. Online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.21435/sfh.25 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License. To view a copy of the license, please visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ A free open access version of the book is available at https://doi.org/10.21435/sfh.25 or by scanning this QR code with your mobile device. BoD – Books on Demand, Norderstedt, Germany 2019 Esa Mangeloja https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6975-5458 Religious Revival Movements and the Development of the Twentieth-century Welfare-state in Finland Abstract The Lutheran state church had a monopoly status in Finland for centuries. But its dominance slowly weakened as pietistic revival movements spread in Finland in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. These movements had religious purposes, but they were also forerunners of profound social and economic changes in Finland in the twentieth century. In challenging the role of the state church, they challenged national unity, spread Western cultural values, emphasized individual rights, and improved the status of women in society. Men of political eminence, such as Anders Chydenius, introduced these influences on Finnish economic life. Overall, the revival movements helped to pave the way for the modern Finnish welfare state. During that process, the church lost some of its most important social responsibilities – health care, education and social work – as these tasks were assumed by the secular Finnish state. Introduction As previous studies have shown, religion is a significant factor in explaining the development of the Scandinavian welfare system.1 In this chapter I argue that the effects of religious developments should be included as explanatory variables in accounts of the historical rise of the welfare state in Finland as well. My focus is the influence of pietistic revival movements. Pietist revival movements are an important part of Finnish religious history. Ecstatic movements were born in the 1770s in various parts of Finland and were initially independent of one another. During that time the Christian religion held an unrivalled influence on the beliefs of Finnish citizens, thanks to the determined efforts of the dominant Lutheran state church.2 1 See, e.g., Manow (2002) and Anderson (2009). 2 Ruokanen (2002: 37, 253). 220 Religious Revival Movements and the Development of the Welfare-state in Finland The most noteworthy revival movements were those that remained within the Lutheran state church. They began mainly as protest movements, and the followers were somewhat spurned by the officials of the church. These followers belonged formally to the church but were also, to a greater or lesser extent, involved in their own separate groups. The diversity of Finnish revival movements reflects the fact that they have often been most successful individually in particular geographical areas. Some of the important revival movements in Finnish history are the Awakening Movement (or just the Awakening; herännäisyys in Finnish), Beseecherism (rukoilevaisuus in Finnish), the Laestadian Movement (lestadiolaisuus in Finnish) and the Lutheran Evangelical Movement (evankelisuus in Finnish). All these movements have their own traditions, hymns, and religious rhetoric. The latest large revival movement is the Fifth Revival (viides herätysliike in Finnish), which has also remained inside the Lutheran church. The political state of affairs in Finland in the nineteenth century was somewhat different than that of the other Nordic countries, as its separation from the Kingdom of Sweden in 1809 raised the need to strengthen Finnish nationalism. In nineteenth-century Finland the Lutheran church functioned as a safeguard against Russian hegemony. As a result, religious revival movements played an important national unifying role. For political, sociological, and cultural reasons, Finland proved to be fertile soil for new revivals.3 Finnish revival movements were thus important cultural and political forces because they spread Western cultural influences, strengthened the work ethic, and emphasized individualism and civil rights. The emphasis of Lutheranism on the importance of daily work and a ‘priesthood of all believers’ corresponds to values central to the Finnish welfare state: full employment and equality.4 History of pietism In Germany, important dissident voices against the theological mainstream appeared towards the end of the seventeenth century, most notably in the pietist movement led by Philipp Jacob Spener (1635–1705), who was the leader of the congregation in Frankfurt. Pietists accused the Lutheran church of having lapsed into its own version of Scholasticism, its theology repeating similar themes with increasing logical sophistication but showing little real new life. Spener argued that the Lutheran orthodox ecclesiastical establishment had become so absorbed in the defence of doctrinal correctness that it was neglecting the pastoral needs of ordinary Christians. The religious life of the Lutheran parish had become desiccated and stale.5 3 Kakkuri (2014: 111). 4 Anderson (2009: 213). 5 Clark (2007: 124). 221 Esa Mangeloja After Spener, August Herman Francke (1663–1727) founded the famous Francke Foundations. The establishmentof this foundation signalled that pietism was not only demanding personal faith, but was a practically oriented movement, emphasizing education, missionary work, and social care. In Finland, an early forerunner for pietism and a main figure in challenging later Lutheran orthodoxy was Johann Arndt (1555–1621). His books The Garden of Paradise (first Finnish translation published 1732, with three other additional editions published during the eighteenth century in Finland) and True Christianity (published in 1832 in Finnish) were important guides for Finnish revivals. Pietism proper came ashore in Finland relatively rapidly. One of the first importers of pietism was Johannes Gezelius the younger (1647–1718), who later became the Bishop of Turku. He lived in Frankfurt am Main during the years when pietism was gaining force. There Gezelius became acquainted with Spener and other pietists, with whom he also corresponded after he left Germany. However, in the eighteenth century, religion was far from being a private matter; it was also an essential political factor. If one struggled against the Lutheran state church, one was fighting against the very identity of the nation and society.6 This meant severe punishments for some of the more influential pietists. For instance, the most influential early pietist in Finland, Laurentius Ulstadius, caused a riot in Turku during a Mass in 1688 and was sentenced to death in 1692, with the sentence later changed to life in prison. He died in 1732 after spending 44 years in prison. Another early pietist in Finland, Petter Schäfer (1663–1729), first escaped to Germany and later to North America because of his religious convictions. After his long travels, he finally returned to Turku and in 1709 was sentenced to death and imprisoned for his lifetime.7 Schäfer was detained in the castle of Turku and during his last years in Gävle, Sweden, where he died in 1729. Yet another of the early pietists in Finland was Isaacus Laurbecchius (1677–1719), who was a learned son of the bishop of Viipuri. He got a Doctor’s degree at the University of Altdorf at the age of only 23. His contacts with Schäfer caused him serious problems, and he subsequently lost his degree, priesthood, and academic position.8 Thus, when analysing the importance of the Lutheran church in Finland, not only the theological dimensions are important, but the political as well. The period when Finland was a Grand Duchy of Russia (1809–1917) was a difficult one for Finnish identity. Under Russian rule, Finland struggled to maintain its Scandinavian culture and autonomy. Several important institutions were ‘Russianized’ during this time, such as the Senate and the University of Helsinki, among many others. Nevertheless, one central Finnish authority and institution

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    20 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us