No Hexavalent Half-Arc-Transitive Graphs of Order Twice a Prime Square Exist

No Hexavalent Half-Arc-Transitive Graphs of Order Twice a Prime Square Exist

Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) (2018) 128:3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12044-018-0385-4 No hexavalent half-arc-transitive graphs of order twice a prime square exist MI-MI ZHANG Department of Mathematics, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China E-mail: [email protected] MS received 30 September 2016; revised 1 October 2017; accepted 3 November 2017; published online 19 March 2018 Abstract. Agraphishalf-arc-transitive if its automorphism group acts transitively on its vertex set and edge set, but not arc set. Let p be a prime. Wang and Feng (Discrete Math. 310 (2010) 1721–1724) proved that there exists no tetravalent half-arc-transitive graphs of order 2p2. In this paper, we extend this result to prove that no hexavalent half-arc-transitive graphs of order 2p2 exist. Keywords. Half-arc-transitive; bi-Cayley graph; vertex transitive; edge transitive. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 05C25, 20B25. 1. Introduction All groups considered in this paper are finite, and all graphs are finite, connected, simple and undirected. For group-theoretic and graph-theoretic terminologies not defined here, we refer the reader to [4,24]. For a graph ,letV (), E(), A() and Aut () be the vertex set, the edge set, the arc set and the full automorphism group of , respectively. A graph is said to be vertex- transitive, edge-transitive or arc-transitive if Aut () acts transitively on V (), E() or A(), respectively. A graph is said to be half-arc-transitive provided that it is vertex- and edge-transitive, but not arc-transitive. The investigation of half-arc-transitive graphs was initiated by Tutte [20] who proved that a vertex- and edge-transitive graph with odd valency must be arc-transitive. In 1970, Bouwer [2] constructed an infinite family of half-arc-transitive graphs, and proved the existence of half-arc-transitive graphs of every even valency at least 4. After Bouwer’s work, many infinite families of half-arc-transitive graphs have been constructed (see, for example, [11,16–18,21]). In 1981, Holt [15] found a half-arc-transitive graph with 27 vertices and valency 4. Alspach et al. [1] proved that Holt’s graph is the smallest half-arc- transitive graph. In the literature, tetravalent half-arc-transitive graphs have also received a lot of attention (see [7,19]), and much work focuses on the classification problem. Let p beaprime.Xu[25] classified the tetravalent half-arc-transitive graphs of order p3 and Feng et al. [13] classified the tetravalent half-arc-transitive graphs of order p4.Itisknown that no half-arc-transitive graphs of order p or p2 exist (see [1]). In [8], Cheng and Oxley © Indian Academy of Sciences 1 3 Page 2 of 8 Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) (2018) 128:3 proved that there exist no half-arc-transitive graphs of order 2p.In[23], Wang and Feng proved that no tetravalent half-arc-transitive graphs of order 2p2 exist. In this paper, we shall extend this result to the hexavalent half-arc-transitive graphs of order 2p2. The following is the main result of this paper. Theorem 1.1. No hexavalent half-arc-transitive graphs of order twice a prime square exist. 2. Preliminaries For a finite, simple and undirected graph and a subset B of V (), the subgraph of induced by B will be denoted by [B]. Let be a connected vertex-transitive graph, and let G ≤ Aut () be vertex-transitive on .ForaG-invariant partition B of V (),thequotient graph B is defined as the graph with vertex set B such that for any two vertices B, C ∈ B, B is adjacent to C if and only if there exist u ∈ B and v ∈ C which are adjacent in .LetN be a normal subgroup of G. Then the set B of orbits of N in V () is a G-invariant partition of V (). In this case, the symbol B will be replaced by N . Z Z∗ For a positive integer n,let n denote the cyclic group of order n and n be the mul- tiplicative group of Zn consisting of numbers coprime to n. For two groups M and N, N M denotes a semidirect product of N by M. For a subgroup H of a group G, denote by CG (H) the centralizer of H in G and by NG (H) the normalizer of H of G. Let G be a permutation group on a set and α ∈ . Denoted by Gα the stabilizer of α in G, that is, the subgroup of G fixing the point α. We say that G is semiregular on if Gα = 1 for every α ∈ and regular if G is transitive and semiregular. It is well-known that a graph is a Cayley graph if it has a group of automorphisms acting regularly on V (). If we, instead, require the graph to have a group of automorphisms acting semiregularly on V () with two orbits, then we obtain a so-called bi-Cayley graph. The following proposition is easy to obtain (see, for example, [23, Proposition 1.2]). PROPOSITION 2.1 Every edge-transitive Cayley graph over an abelian group is also arc-transitive. Note that every bi-Cayley graph admits the following concrete realization. Given a group H,letR, L and S be subsets of H such that R−1 = R, L−1 = L and R ∪ L does not contain the identity element of H.Thebi-Cayley graph over H relative to the triple (R, L, S), denoted by BiCay(H, R, L, S) is the graph having vertex set the union of the right part H0 ={h0 | h ∈ H} and the left part H1 ={h1 | h ∈ H}, and edge set the union −1 −1 of the right edges {{h0, g0}|gh ∈ R}, the left edges {{h1, g1}|gh ∈ L} and the −1 spokes {{h0, g1}|gh ∈ S}.If|R|=|L|=s, then BiCay(H, R, L, S)issaidtobe an s-type bi-Cayley graph (see [27]). Let = BiCay(H, R, L, S).Forg ∈ H, define a permutation R(g) on the vertices of by the rule R(g) = ( ) , ∀ ∈ Z , ∈ . hi hg i i 2 h H Then R(H) ={R(h) | h ∈ H} is a semiregular subgroup of Aut () which is isomorphic to H and has H0 and H1 as its orbits. When R(H) is normal in Aut (), the bi-Cayley graph Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) (2018) 128:3 Page 3 of 8 3 = BiCay(H, R, L, S) will be called a normal bi-Cayley graph over H (see [28]). A bi-Cayley graph over an abelian group is simply called a bi-abelian. The following proposition is about half-arc-transitive bi-abelians. PROPOSITION 2.2 [9, Proposition 1.3] Every connected regular edge transitive bi-Cayley graph = BiCay(H, R, L, S) over an abelian group is vertex-transitive. Moreover, if is half-arc-transitive, then R ∪ Lis non-empty and does not contain involutions |R|=|L| is even, |S| > 2, and the valency of is at least 6. In view of [22], we have the following proposition. PROPOSITION 2.3 [22, Proposition 2.6] Let X be a connected half-arc-transitive graphs of valency 2n. Let A = Aut (X) and let Au be the stabilizer of u ∈ V (X) in A. Then each prime divisor of |Au| is a divisor of n!. In particular, if X has valency 6 then Au is a {2, 3}-group. By Theorems 1 and 3 of [5], we have the following proposition. PROPOSITION 2.4 [5] Let be a arc-transitive graph of order p and valency n with p a prime and 0 < n < p. Then n is even and divides p − 1 and |Aut ()|=np. Let p be a prime. The following two propositions are all cubic arc-transitive graphs of order 2p and 4p, respectively. PROPOSITION 2.5 [12, Proposition 2.8] Let p be a prime and let be a connected cubic arc-transitive graph of order 2p. Then is 1-,2-,3-or4-regular. Furthermore, −1 (1) is 1-regular if and only if is isomorphic to the graph Cay (D2p, {a, ab, ab }), p 2 where D2p =a, b | a = b = 1, bab = 1, p ≥ 13 and p − 1 is a multiple of 3.In −λ this case, the Cayley graph Cay (D2p, {a, ab, ab }) is normal and it is independent λ Z∗ of the choice of an element of order 3 in p. (2) is 2-regular if and only if is isomorphic to the complete graph K4 of order 4. (3) is 3-regular if and only if is isomorphic to the complete bipartite graph K3,3 of order 6 or the Petersen graph O3 of order 10. (4) is 4-regular if and only if is isomorphic to the Heawood graph of order 14. PROPOSITION 2.6 [26, Theorem 1.3] Let be a connected cubic arc-transitive graph of order 4p, p a prime. Then is one of the following: Q3, the 3-dimensional cube; D20, the dodecahedron; C28, the Coxeter graph; and G P(10, 3), the generalized Peterson graph, which is also the standard double cover of Petersen graph. 3 Page 4 of 8 Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) (2018) 128:3 3. Proof of Theorem 1.1 Suppose to the contrary, is a hexavalent half-arc-transitive graph of order 2p2 for a prime p. As the smallest half-arc-transitive graph has order 27, we can assume that p ≥ 5. Let A = Aut () and let P be a Sylow p-subgroup of A.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us