TheThe Politics Outlook: of Masculinity Journal in Tony of Gould’s English Imperial Studies Warriors ISSN: 2565-4748 (Print); ISSN: 2773-8124 (Online) Published by Department of English, Prithvi Narayan Campus Tribhuvan University, Pokhara, Nepal [A Peer-Reviewed, Open Access Journal; Indexed in NepJOL] http://ejournals.pncampus.edu.np/ejournals/outlook/ THEORETICAL/CRITICAL ESSAY ARTICLE The Politics of Masculinity in Tony Gould’s Imperial Warriors: Britain and the Gurkhas Ram Prasad Rai Department of English, Ratna Rajyalaxmi Campus, Kathmandu, Nepal Article History:1Submitted 2 June 2021; Reviewed 20 June 2021; Revised 4 July 2021 Corresponding Author: Ram Prasad Rai, Email: [email protected] DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ojes.v12i1.38749 Abstract The main concern of this paper is to study on masculinity and more importantly the hyper masculinity of the Gorkhas in Imperial Warriors: Britain and the Gurkhas by Tony Gould. The writer describes the courage with discipline and dedication, the Gorkhas had while fighting for Nepal, their homeland during the Anglo-Nepal War (1814-1816) and for Britain in the First and Second World Wars, following the other wars and confrontations in many parts of the world. Despite a lot of hardships and pain in wars, they never showed their back to the enemies, but kept Britain’s imperial image always high with victories. They received Victoria Crosses along with other bravery medals. As a masculinity, the hegemonic masculinity is obviously present in the book since the high ranked British Officers are in the position to lead the Gorkha soldiers. However, the masculinity here is associated with the extreme level of bravery and that is the hyper- masculinity of the Gorkhas. Since this is a qualitative research work, the researcher has consulted various books, reviews and journal articles related to the Gorkhas. It is a new concept in the study of the Gorkhas in the particular book by Gould. So, it will certainly be a new insight for the future researchers in the related area. Keywords: Confrontations, courage, hyper masculinity, loyalty, world wars Introduction In general, the term “masculinity” refers to maleness. There are certain qualities with males that make their maleness. “Masculinity is a set of qualities, characteristics or roles generally considered typical of, or appropriate to, a boy or man” (Siddhanta and SK 1). Traditionally, a male is believed to be strong, brave, capable to face risks, independent and able to give protection to his family members. Females are said to be weak hearted, sensitive, passive, and dependent upon the male authority. In our society, males are usually found involved in risk bearing tasks such as carrying heavy loads; driving heavy vehicles; flying planes; rescuing people from natural disasters and so on. Murray Drummond asserts, “…the visual aspects of males, such as large muscular 1Copyright 2021 © the Author(s) and the Publisher. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License. The Outlook: Journal of English Studies, Vol. 12, July 2021 [pp. 34-42] 34 The Politics of Masculinity in Tony Gould’s Imperial Warriors bodies, and traditional stereotypical “masculinized” roles including financial provider, along with the heteronormative construction of being a protector of families and females” (1). Males do outside works and manage daily needed goods in a family. Females usually stay home and do cooking, washing, feeding children and supporting the males. However, now-a-days, an exchange in gender roles between males and females can be observed in some societies. For example, husbands stay busy in the household works and wives go to office and earn money for the families. People are a little liberal in the matter of gender role in the society these days. What is more, about the plurality of masculinity Sanjeev Uprety argues that “there is not a single, universal model of masculinity; rather, there are multiple masculinities shaped by a variety factors, including class, ethnicity, and institutional and political location” (41). The sense of masculinity has been multiple in the modern days. The homosexuality of males is a form of masculinity. People would remain silent about the homosexuality prior to the 19th century. Sean Nixon notes, “Jeffrey Weeks has charted historically the formation of a range of (largely masculine) sexual identities from the late eighteenth century onwards” (297). Giving space to homosexuality in discourse was illegal in the society. The same sex relation was strictly prohibited in the past. Only after the 19th century, people began to talk about homosexuality especially male homosexuality. For John Brannigan, “Male homosexuality also found itself too often expressed through farce” (638). It became a subject matter in literature only in the early 20th century. Since then, people began to write and read about homosexuality in the Western universities. The openness of homosexuality in the society is a power play of masculinity as “the criminalization of male homosexuality in England and Wales in 1885 was an important part of this process” (Jary and Jary 273). It was a big challenge to the conventional society. It concerned with the sexual identity of males. As a result, homosexuality stands as one of the modes of plural masculinity. Hegemonic masculinity is another form of masculinity. It occupies a strong space in everyday life in our society. The term “hegemony” is introduced by the Italian philosopher Antonio Gramsci about which Murray Drummond writes, “Hegemony is a concept arising from Antonio Gramsci’s early works in relation to the formation and destruction of social groups based on winning and holding power” (1). The meaning of ‘hegemony’ is a rule over people by winning their consent but not by imposing force upon them. In the similar way, ‘hegemonic masculinity’ indicates the control of male over not only females but also other males of lower class, caste or ranks in offices. According to Sofia Aboim, “Although hegemonic masculinity is essentially directed at the domination of women thereby nourishing a traditionally dichotomized gender system that cuts across social class, it similarly discriminates against men from lower classes and, even more so, gay and non-white males” (3). The females are already subordinated to male authority but in hegemonic masculinity, males also are submissive to males in power. In hegemonic masculinity, there is “men’s domination over women and power of some men over other (often minority groups of) men” (Connell 113). They are in margin having lack of access to the power in centre. Hegemonic masculinity is not strange because it is a common practice that we have in our society. The most extreme form of masculinity is hyper-masculinity. It is introduced by Donald L. Mosher and M. Sirkin. The prefix “hyper” signifies “over or beyond, excessive” (Brown 121). So, hyper-masculinity is a super level of masculinity. That is sometimes counted as unusual intelligence, skill or power and it attracts attention of many people in a positive way. Moreover, it is also concerned with the topmost level of courage and bravery of men in their action. On the other hand, it sometimes roles The Outlook: Journal of English Studies, Vol. 12, July 2021 [pp. 34-42] 35 The Politics of Masculinity in Tony Gould’s Imperial Warriors negative as well. Matt C. Zaitchik and Donald L. Mosher argue that hyper-masculinity is an extreme form of masculine gender ideology, often comprised of a cluster of beliefs that includes toughness, violence, dangerousness, and calloused attitudes toward women and sex (228). That is why hyper-masculinity denotes also the masculinity which has a destructive, irrational and erotic nature. However, warriors’ war heroism, the hyper- masculinity should not be taken as “destructive and exaggerated” (Herek 66). Though there are deaths, injuries, violence and destruction in wars, it is headed for something good. The Gorkhas’ masculinity is their hyper-masculinity because their heroic battling has made them victorious in many wars around the world. Their worldwide popularity in war heroism has made not only themselves and Britain but also Nepal known to the world. The book Imperial Warriors: Britain and the Gurkhas by Tony Gould talks about the Gorkhas’ bravery they showed in the Anglo-Nepal War (1814-1816) for their motherland and in many wars around the world along with the First and Second World Wars on behalf of Britain. With extreme courage, they fought against the British East India Company who had to face many deaths of their soldiers, but eventually the Gorkha soldiers were compelled to accept their defeat because they lacked modern war weapons like their enemies had. After their recruitment in the British East India Company, they were able to make the British authority happy because they succeeded to suppress banditries and mutinies that were a great headache for them. Similarly, in the First and Second World Wars, the Gorkhas’ heroic battling helped Britain to expand her imperial power around the world. The Gorkhas were one and only the power to keep the name and fame of Britain high in the world. Even after the Second World War, they have contributed their hard work to Britain by over-coming the confrontations in Malaya and Borneo Island and defeating Argentina in Falklands War. All these contributions of the Gorkhas are concerned with their masculinity, but it goes beyond the common masculinity and it is their ‘hyper masculinity’ which this paper aims to study on in Imperial Warriors: Britain and the Gurkhas. Masculinity and the Anglo-Nepal War The masculinity and hyper-masculinity of the Gorkhas exhibited in the Anglo Nepal war has occupied an important place in the history of Nepal and should even be the same in the British and the world history. The various principalities of Nepal had already been united into a greater Nepal by the hyper-masculinity of the late King Prithvi Narayan Shah and his successors.