Unplighted Troths: Causes for Divorce in a Frontier Town Toward the End of the Nineteenth Century

Unplighted Troths: Causes for Divorce in a Frontier Town Toward the End of the Nineteenth Century

University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for 1993 Unplighted Troths: Causes for Divorce in a Frontier Town Toward The End of the Nineteenth Century C. Robert Haywood Washburn University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the Other International and Area Studies Commons Haywood, C. Robert, "Unplighted Troths: Causes for Divorce in a Frontier Town Toward The End of the Nineteenth Century" (1993). Great Plains Quarterly. 737. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/737 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. UN PLIGHTED TROTHS CAUSES FOR DIVORCE IN A FRONTIER TOWN TOWARD THE END OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY C. ROBERT HAYWOOD "Welcome to Dodge City, the biggest, national social values and mores that later gen­ wildest, wickedest little city on the continent," erations would label Victorian. As a mecca for was the exuberant greeting given out-of-town free-spending cowboys it was a place to let off visitors to Dodge's Fourth ofJuly celebration in steam, live high, and have fun. For the mer­ 1883. The assessment projected was a self­ chants, gamblers, joint operators, and cattle­ congratulatory one shared and frequently en­ men it was a time to fleece the unwary, reap vied by the rest of the United States. Dodge was handsome profits, and grow respectably rich.! enjoying the peak of its cattle-town fame and But not for everyone. Mary Sawyer needed a prosperity as the quintessential frontier boom divorce--desperately needed to be free of the town, unrestrained by convention, the "very marital trap she found herself in. She was con­ embodiment of waywardness and wantonness." fined to a sick bed in a dugout where the damp, Few communities seemed more at odds with the crumbling walls provided shelter "little better than living outside." Her husband swore at her, falsely accused her of adultery, refused to pro­ vide adequate food or fuel, and neglected her at the most critical point of her illness. For Mary Sawyer, the crucial questions relating to Dodge City were would the local courts in this male­ dominated setting where women were seen in the courtroom only in the dock or on rare occa­ C. Robert Haywood is professor of history and vice­ sions in the spectator's gallery, provide a rem­ president emeritus of Washburn University. His books edy for her plight? And, if so, on what grounds?2 on Kansas history include Cowtown Lawyers (1988) For the rest of the United States, contradict­ and V ictorian West (1991). ing the stereotypical conception of ironclad marriages and compliant, even beleaguered, Victorian wives, divorce rates rose rapidly in [GPQ 13 (Fall 1993): 211-21] the last half of the nineteenth century, jumping 211 212 GREAT PLAINS QUARTERLY, FALL 1993 almost eighty percent in the United States in the divorces granted, 34.2 percent for husbands the decade of the 1870s. Mary perhaps knew to 65.8 percent for wives. In Dodge women did that the West led the other sections in this even better, winning 69.5 percent of the cases. 7 increase and Kansas ranked well up among the The new perception of family life saw mar­ leading states.3 Kansas supported liberal statutes riage as involving mutual love and respect in and generous judicial interpretations of what what was to be an economically and sexually constituted grounds for divorce. The earliest compatible partnership to undergird procre­ divorce law in territorial Kansas made provi­ ation and shared child-nurturing. A husband in sions for nine causes of dissolution, which in­ such an arrangement was obligated to be a cluded such open, catch-all phrases as "shall caring and considerate companion who pro­ offer such indignities to the person ... of the vided for the physical comforts of wife and other as shall render his or her condition intol­ children; the wife's reciprocal role was to pro­ erable."4 The statutes applying during the last vide moral guidance for all in the family, nur­ quarter of the nineteenth century had expanded ture the children, look after the home, and to ten the causes for granting a divorce. Al­ cheerfully submit to the husband in all reason­ though omitting the nebulous "intolerable con­ able demands in other matters.s Although the dition" clause, the newer statutes replaced it bargain seemed tipped in the husband's favor, with an equally flexible expression, "gross ne­ the woman's position of moral superiority over glect of duty."5 District courts could and did men made her, as one western Kansas newspa­ grant divorce for anyone or any combination of per put it, "the inspiration of all good works,"9 the ten reasons. Ford County, with Dodge City and, consequently, the recipient of great respect the county seat in 1874, was served by the and discreet behavior from the husband in and Sixteenth District Court and, like more than away from the home, even though public life three hundred other citizens of the town and its clearly reflected male domination. environs between 1874 and 1900, Mary Sawyer The details of what this domestic relation­ brought her petition to the District Court.6 ship ought to be were often hammered out, not The rapidly rising national divorce rate was in the glorifying, ethereal rhetoric of women's not initiated by the changing laws, however, but magazines and other uplifting literature, but in was, like the laws themselves, a reflection of the bitter, even nasty confrontations of the society's changing understanding of the duties divorce court. Godey's Lady's Book could de­ of marriage partners. Women's rights were ex­ scribe the moral and spiritual infusion of the panded during this period and women took mother as the "light of the home," a loving, advantage of changed attitudes to free them­ caring, and calming companion, but when John selves from unfortunate unions. Approximately H. Cane, in the district court held in Dodge seventy percent of all divorce cases in the City, charged his wife, Sally, with being "a United States were initiated by women (70.3 woman of temper, of a cold and cruel disposition percent in the Dodge City district). These spi­ ... easily provoked and angered, which caused raling numbers, according to Robert L. Griswold, him to leave home to keep from bearing her were "an accurate barometer of rising marital abuse" while she was "twitting him" and "aggra­ expectations" on the part of women. Men found vating him," the court might agree that her the causes women used in seeking dissolution of behavior was "outrageous," but it was not a marriages equally serviceable justifications for deviation so far from the norms of her duty as ending their own untenable unions. Perhaps to justify divorce. On the other hand, when Mary Sawyer would have sought the court's John used "profane and indecent language in remedy earlier if she had known that female the presence of the children," beat his wife with petitioners were usually favorably received by a broomstick, and failed to provide decent these all-male bastions of justice. Nationally, housing when he had the opportunity, the women received approximately two-thirds of court found he had not fulfilled his duties as a DIVORCE IN A FRONTIER TOWN 213 husband and granted Sally a divorce that pro­ two-year requirement provided in the original vided an equitable division ofland and property statutes adopted in 1855. The hardship suffered (3770).10 It was from such distinctions, aired in by a spouse and family during an extended public, that the weighing of wifely and husbandly absence and the improvement of transportation duty was spelled out with full legal and societal on the frontier, making travel easier and quicker, sanctions behind them. The District Court in indicated that a change in the law was needed. Dodge was to have ample opportunity ro deal But even more important was the alteration of with the distinctions. society's domestic ideology to stress the joint Divorce came to the citizens of Dodge during obligation of husband and wife to a marriage. the last half of the nineteenth century like the When the prescribed duties were broken, as common cold, respecting neither class nor fi­ they most surely were when a spouse deserted nancial standing. The two leading merchants, the family, divorce became a benign remedy to Robert M. Wright and Charles Rath, and their be applied as soon as reasonably possibleY If wives found themselves in court, as did many there was a question of return or reconciliation, men and women who were so poverty stricken the court did not hesitate to place limits on the they could nQt travel even short distances to conditions for granting the final decree, and, by contest the proceedings. The wives of the law­ statute, the decree would only become "abso­ yers, real estate men, and physicians-men pos­ lute and take effect" at the end of six months. sessing the best education the community could As was true for the rest of the United States, boast (for example, Frederick T. M. Wenie, C. abandonment was the ground most frequently S. Williams, and Harry E. Gryden)-had the cited by Dodge City plaintiffs. Between 1867 same dubious honor of being divorcees as did and 1886 in the United States, 75,191 women Tinnie Dibrow, who signed her petition with and 51,485 men indicated desertion as cause for an X.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us