Tracheal Cartilaginous Sleeves in Children with Syndromic Craniosynostosis

Tracheal Cartilaginous Sleeves in Children with Syndromic Craniosynostosis

ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE © American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Tracheal cartilaginous sleeves in children with syndromic craniosynostosis Tara L. Wenger, MD, PhD1, John Dahl, MD, PhD2, Elizabeth J. Bhoj, MD, PhD3, Anna Rosen, BS1, Donna McDonald-McGinn, MS, CGC3, Elaine Zackai, MD3, Ian Jacobs, MD4, Carrie L. Heike, MD, MS1, Anne Hing, MD1, Avni Santani, PhD3, Andrew F. Inglis, MD2, Kathleen C.Y. Sie, MD2, Michael Cunningham, MD, PhD1 and Jonathan Perkins, DO2 Purpose: Because a tracheal cartilaginous sleeve (TCS) confers a Conclusion: There is an association between TCS and syndromic ­significant mortality risk that can be mitigated with appropriate inter- craniosynostosis, and it appears to be particularly high in individu- vention, we sought to describe the prevalence and associated geno- als with the W290C mutation in FGFR2. Referral to a pediatric oto- types in a large cohort of children with syndromic craniosynostosis. laryngologist and consideration of operative airway evaluation (i.e., bronchoscopy or rigid endoscopy) in all patients with syndromic Methods: Chart review of patients with syndromic craniosynostosis craniosynostosis should be considered to evaluate for TCS. Results across two institutions. from genetic testing may help providers weigh the risks and benefits Results: In a cohort of 86 patients with syndromic craniosynostosis, of early airway evaluation and intervention in children with higher- 31 required airway evaluation under anesthesia. TCS was found in risk genotypes. 19, for an overall prevalence of 22%. FGFR2, TWIST1, and FGFR3 mutations were identified in children with TCS. All five children with Genet Med advance online publication 26 May 2016 a W290C mutation in FGFR2 had TCS, and most previously reported children with W290C had identification of TCS or early death. In Key Words: Crouzon syndrome; Pfeiffer syndrome; Saethre-­ contrast, TCS was not associated with other mutations at residue 290. Chotzen syndrome; sudden death; tracheal cartilaginous sleeves INTRODUCTION syndrome and a child with Opitz G syndrome.3,6–31 Lertsburapa Syndromic craniosynostosis syndromes (e.g., Pfeiffer, Crouzon, and colleagues performed a meta-analysis of all previously Apert, Beare-Stevenson, Saethre-Chotzen) are associated with reported cases of TCS and reported a 90% risk of death by age significant morbidity and mortality, including increased risk of 2 years without a tracheostomy.8 Of note, no patients in that infantile death. Early mortality estimates were approximately study had undergone surgical airway reconstruction, which 25–85% for Pfeiffer syndrome.1–3 With advances in early surgi- may be an effective surgical alternative to tracheostomy.17 TCS cal interventions, more recent estimates have ranged from 7 to is often diagnosed by bronchoscopy, although many cases are 22%.4,5 Some deaths have been attributed to complications of diagnosed at the time of autopsy. An operative airway evalu- known malformations. However, there is also an increased risk ation with general anesthesia in young infants also carries sig- of death due to sudden respiratory arrest.6 nificant risk, making it difficult to balance the anesthesia and A tracheal cartilaginous sleeve (TCS) occurs when typical procedure-related risks with the risk of delaying TCS diagnosis. segmentation of the C-shaped tracheal rings is absent and the Approximately 50 children with TCS have been reported, trachea consists of a long tube of solid cartilage anteriorly and with varying amounts of phenotypic information and incon- laterally, with a normal membranous tracheal wall posteriorly.7 sistent genetic testing. Although craniosynostosis syn- Typical C-shaped rings permit airway distention for effective dromes such as Apert and Beare-Stevenson syndromes are airway clearance with coughing and normal tracheal lumen easily distinguishable based on clinical examination, there is enlargement. As a child with TCS grows, the tubelike tracheal significant overlap between the clinical features of Crouzon cartilage fails to appropriately increase in size, resulting in a and Pfeiffer syndromes, and some overlap with Saethre- relatively stenotic airway. This phenomenon places patients Chotzen syndrome. Identical mutations in FGFR2 have at risk for sudden death due to tracheal occlusion. Most chil- been reported in children with clinical diagnoses of either dren with TCS also have syndromic craniosynostosis, although Crouzon syndrome or Pfeiffer syndrome.32 Moreover, most TCS has been reported in a patient with suspected Goldenhar of these conditions share common medical problems and 1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Craniofacial Medicine, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA; 2Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA; 3Department of Pediatrics, Division of Human Genetics and Molecular Biology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; 4Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Correspondence: Tara L. Wenger ([email protected]) Submitted 28 January 2016; accepted 29 March 2016; advance online publication 26 May 2016. doi:10.1038/gim.2016.60 62 Volume 19 | Number 1 | January 2017 | GEnEticS in mEdicinE Tracheal sleeves in syndromic craniosynostosis | WENGER et al ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE management issues, and there is a significantly increased tracheal wall (Figure 1). High-resolution computerized risk of infantile death with all of these syndromes. Many tomography and/or direct visualization of the anterior tracheal providers do not routinely perform genetic testing in chil- wall at tracheostomy were used to confirm endoscopic findings. dren with syndromic craniosynostosis because management recommendations are similar for all syndromes. Genotype determination No prevalence estimates are currently available for TCS in After initial determination of prevalence of TCS, we sought to syndromic craniosynostosis, and genotypes have been reported determine whether there were genotype–phenotype correla- for only 18 patients in the literature (see Table 1). Therefore, tions. To do this, we included patients with genotypes of inter- neonatologists and otolaryngologists caring for children with est from a cohort at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia syndromic craniosynostosis have limited ability to make a per- because there were not a sufficient number of patients at Seattle sonalized risk assessment for TCS in a child with syndromic Children’s Hospital to make an adequate comparison. A com- craniosynostosis. This forces providers to use clinical informa- parison cohort of patients with FGFR2 mutations at residue 290 tion to balance the procedure and anesthesia-related risks of were identified by chart review of clinical and/or research test- operative airway evaluation with the risk of missing a TCS. ing at Seattle Children’s Hospital (IRB#10925) or through clini- The goals of the present study were (i) to describe the preva- cal testing by the molecular laboratory at Children’s Hospital of lence of TCS in a population of children with syndromic cranio- Philadelphia. Parents of patients who had genetic testing per- synostosis and (ii) to explore genotype–phenotype correlations formed on a research basis provided informed consent. by combining data from patients with known genotypes in our cohort and the literature. RESULTS Eighty-six children with syndromic craniosynostosis met MATERIALS AND METHODS inclusion criteria for this study. Of these 86, 31 had undergone Prevalence estimate bronchoscopy or rigid endoscopy for evaluation of respiratory Patient selection and population characteristics. We perfor- med a retrospective chart review for children with syndromic Table 1 Reported mutations in patients with tracheal craniosynostosis who received care at Seattle Children’s Hospital cartilaginous sleeve (IRB#10925) and had their most recent visit within the past 3 Number in Present years. Seattle Children’s Hospital is the only craniofacial team Gene Mutation literature report Total referral site for syndromic craniosynostosis for a five-state region FGFR2 C278F – 1 1 (Washington, Alaska, Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming). Because FGFR2 C278L – 1 1 there are no other centers in the five-state region that provide FGFR2 C342G 1 – 1 care for children with syndromic craniosynostosis, we are fairly FGFR2 C342R 2 4 6 confident that there are few, if any, patients living in the region FGFR2 C342S 2 – 2 who have not been evaluated in this center. In addition, few FGFR2 C342W 1 – 1 patients move out of the catchment area after initiating treatment. FGFR2 C342Y – 1 1 At our center, all children with syndromic craniosynostosis are FGFR2 S252W – 1 1 evaluated by experienced pediatric otolaryngologists due to the FGFR2 S347C – 1 1 high rate of midface hypoplasia and obstructive sleep apnea. Children are evaluated at least annually; in the majority of cases, FGFR2 S351C 6 – 6 children receive all of their craniosynostosis-related care through FGFR2 S354C 1 – 1 our hospital. Examination of our database revealed that two FGFR2 W290C 3* 5 8 otolaryngologists (J.P., K.C.Y.S.) had seen 100% of patients eligible FGFR2 Y375C 1 – 1 for this study at Seattle Children’s Hospital. For this study, we also FGFR3 A391E 1 1 2 excluded patients with isolated unicoronal craniosynostosis and TWIST1 Tyr103term – 1 1 a diagnosis of Muenke syndrome because it is common, well (FGFR2) Apert,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us