Measurement of Functional Residual Capacity of the Lung by Partial CO2 Rebreathing Method During Acute Lung Injury in Animals

Measurement of Functional Residual Capacity of the Lung by Partial CO2 Rebreathing Method During Acute Lung Injury in Animals

Measurement of Functional Residual Capacity of the Lung by Partial CO2 Rebreathing Method During Acute Lung Injury in Animals Lara M Brewer MSc, Dinesh G Haryadi PhD, and Joseph A Orr PhD BACKGROUND: Several techniques for measuring the functional residual capacity (FRC) of the lungs in mechanically ventilated patients have been proposed, each of which is based on either nitrogen wash-out or dilution of tracer gases. These methods are expensive, difficult, time-consum- ing, impractical, or require an intolerably large change in the fraction of inspired oxygen. We propose a CO2 wash-in method that allows automatic and continual FRC measurement in mechan- ically ventilated patients. METHODS: We measured FRC with a CO2 partial rebreathing tech- nique, first in a mechanical lung analog, and then in mechanically ventilated animals, before, during, and subsequent to an acute lung injury induced with oleic acid. We compared FRC mea- surements from partial CO2 rebreathing to measurements from a nitrogen wash-out reference method. Using an approved animal protocol, general anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol in 6 swine (38.8–50.8 kg). A partial CO2 rebreathing monitor was placed in the breathing circuit between the endotracheal tube and the Y-piece. The partial CO2 rebreathing signal obtained from the monitor was used to calculate FRC. FRC was also measured with a nitrogen wash-out measurement technique. In the animal studies we collected data from healthy lungs, and then subsequent to a lung injury that simulated the conditions of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. The injury was created by intravenously infusing 0.09 mL/kg of oleic acid over a 15-min period. At each stage of the experiment, the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was set to 0, 5, 10, or 15 cm H2O. At each PEEP level we compared the average of 3 CO2 rebreathing FRC measurements to the average of 3 nitrogen wash-out reference measurements. We also tested the FRC measurement system with a mechanical test lung in which the true FRC could be directly measured. RESULTS: The squared correlation for the linear regression between CO2 rebreathing The average error of .(50 ؍ n) 0.89 ؍ and nitrogen wash-out measurements in the animals was r2 ؎ ؊ the CO2 wash-out system was 87 mL and the limits of agreement were 263 mL. In the mechanical test lung, the average error of the FRC measured via the CO2 wash-in system was .mL, and the limits of agreement were ؎ 103 mL, which was equivalent to 1.7% of the true FRC 37 -CONCLUSION: These results indicate that FRC measure .0.96 ؍ The squared correlation was r2 ment via CO2 rebreathing can reliably detect an FRC decrease during lung injury and can reflect the response of the FRC to treatment with PEEP. Key words: functional residual capacity, FRC, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute lung injury, animal models, lung volumes, mechanical ventilation, carbon dioxide rebreathing, positive end-expiratory pressure. [Respir Care 2007;52(11):1480–1489. © 2007 Daedalus Enterprises] Lara Brewer MSc and Joseph Orr PhD are affiliated with the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. Dinesh Ms Brewer presented a version of this report at the 51st International Haryadi PhD is an employee of Respironics, Wallingford, Connecticut. Respiratory Congress of the American Association for Respiratory Care, held December 3–6, 2005, in San Antonio, Texas. Dr Orr receives royalties from Respironics. Both Dr Orr and Ms Brewer work as consultants for Respironics, which financially supported this Correspondence: Lara Brewer MSc, Department of Anesthesiology, Uni- research. The authors report no other conflicts of interest related to the versity of Utah Health Sciences Center, 30 North 1900 East 3C444 SOM, content of this paper. Salt Lake City UT 84132. 1480 RESPIRATORY CARE • NOVEMBER 2007 VOL 52 NO 11 MEASUREMENT OF FRC DURING ACUTE LUNG INJURY IN ANIMALS Introduction FRC before, during, and after lung injury, with 2 methods: CO2 wash-in and nitrogen wash-out. The aims of the study Measurement of the functional residual capacity (FRC) were to evaluate the new method in a mechanical lung of the lung via computed tomography is a sensitive indi- model and to compare FRC measurements with the 2 meth- cator of decreased aeration and increased consolidation ods in mechanically ventilated animals during induced lung during the progression of acute respiratory distress syn- injury. We demonstrate that the CO2-based FRC measure- drome (ARDS) and acute lung injury (ALI), as well as the ment can be used to trend the effects of lung injury and reversal of the compromised state following appropriate track the response to treatment. ventilator treatment.1–2 Suter et al2 found that the highest FRC coincides with maximum oxygen transport and the Methods highest static compliance at a specific positive end-expi- ratory pressure (PEEP). Hedenstierna3 concluded that FRC Nitrogen Wash-Out Method measurement is critical for finding optimal ventilator set- tings. We used a variation of the nitrogen wash-out FRC- As a surrogate for direct measurement of FRC in ven- measurement method published by Olegard et al16 as the tilated patients, some studies have pointed to the use of reference measurement. This method has been described lung mechanics, including the static pressure-volume in the literature but is not commercially available. In our curves and the measurement of the upper and lower in- implementation, the nitrogen wash-out method required a flection points of the alveolar pressure-volume curve, to brief (Ͻ 5 min) 0.2 step increase in F (eg, from 0.4 to IO2 guide ventilator settings.4 However, mechanics-based mea- 0.6). The volume of released nitrogen and the change in surements have proven difficult to use for guiding venti- nitrogen concentration following the change in F were IO2 lator settings,5 because aeration of the injured lung is dy- used to calculate FRC. namic and heterogeneous.6 Direct measurement of FRC Oxygen was analyzed with a sidestream paramagnetic could allow ventilation to be set by volume rather than by O2 analyzer (Datex, Helsinki, Finland). CO2 was mea- pressure. sured with an infrared analyzer, and flow was measured Although computed tomography has been useful for de- with a differential pressure-type pneumotachometer, both termining the pathophysiology and progression of ARDS/ of which are integrated in the NICO2 mainstream sensor ALI and for demonstrating the usefulness of the FRC mea- (model 7300, Respironics-Novametrix, Wallingford, Con- surement to actively control lung volume during mechanical necticut). The gas analyzers were calibrated with calibra- ventilation, the method is regarded as risky and cumber- tion gas prior to the experiment. Each of the analyzers some to use regularly at the bedside for monitoring the automatically re-zeros periodically to avoid baseline drift. evolution of lung injury and the effects of the ventilatory Gas for the sidestream analyzer was sampled at the ven- strategy. Several other techniques for FRC measurement tilator circuit Y-piece, and the mainstream sensor was in mechanically ventilated patients have been proposed placed between the gas sampling adaptor and the endotra- during the past 2 decades, each of which is based on either cheal tube. Both inspired and expired gases were measured nitrogen wash-out or dilution of tracer gases. The tech- continuously. niques include closed-circuit helium dilution,7,8 open-cir- The raw data of flow and gas concentration measure- cuit nitrogen wash-out,9–11 and open-circuit sulfur ments were sampled at 100 Hz and processed digitally hexafluoride wash-out.12,13 Additionally, FRC has been using custom-written software to generate end-tidal and 14 estimated via electrical impedance tomography and a volumetric O2 and CO2 measurements and tidal volume 15 single-breath-hold Fick method. These methods are ex- (VT). We calculated oxygen consumption from the di- pensive, difficult and time consuming at the bedside, im- rectly measured CO consumption (V˙ ) and the mini- 2 CO2 practical for continual use, or require an intolerably large mum/maximum difference in the O2 signal. We assumed change in the fraction of inspired oxygen (F )tocom- that since the waveform of the fast oxygen signal is an IO2 plete the measurement. inverted, scaled version of the capnogram, oxygen con- We propose here a CO wash-in method that allows sumption can be calculated as V˙ multiplied by the min- 2 CO2 automatic and continual measurement of FRC in mechan- imum/maximum difference in the O2 divided by the min- 9,16 ically ventilated subjects. The new method measures FRC imum/maximum difference in CO2. We calculated end- using the “CO wash-in” signals during the onset of a tidal and mixed nitrogen fraction (F ) as the balance gas 2 N2 partial CO rebreathing maneuver that is automatically (F ϭ 1–F –F ). Nitrogen excretion was calculated 2 N2 O2 CO2 initiated every 3 minutes by a CO2 rebreathing noninva- as the difference between expired volume multiplied by sive cardiac output monitor (NICO2, Respironics, Wall- mixed expired N2 fraction and inspired volume multiplied ingford, Connecticut). In an oleic acid model of ARDS/ by inspired N2 fraction. After at least 2 minutes of baseline ALI in mechanically ventilated animals, we measured the data had been collected, the nitrogen wash-out FRC mea- RESPIRATORY CARE • NOVEMBER 2007 VOL 52 NO 11 1481 MEASUREMENT OF FRC DURING ACUTE LUNG INJURY IN ANIMALS surement was initiated by increasing the F by 0.2 for each IO2 measurement, within the range of 0.3 to 1.0. Typically, the successive step changes in F for 3 measurements were 0.4 IO2 to 0.6, 0.6 to 0.8, and 0.8 to 1.0.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us