Brief Amici Curiae: U.S. V Virginia

Brief Amici Curiae: U.S. V Virginia

NYLS Journal of Human Rights Volume 14 Issue 1 A SYMPOSIUM ON FINDING A PATH TO GENDER EQUALITY: LEGAL AND POLICY Article 19 ISSUES RAISED BY ALL-FEMALE PUBLIC EDUCATION 1997 BRIEF AMICI CURIAE: U.S. V VIRGINIA Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_human_rights Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation (1997) "BRIEF AMICI CURIAE: U.S. V VIRGINIA," NYLS Journal of Human Rights: Vol. 14 : Iss. 1 , Article 19. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_human_rights/vol14/iss1/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of Human Rights by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. No. 94-1941 In the OCTOBER TERM, 1994 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, -V.- COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, et al., Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRcurr BRIEF AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS; THE CENTER FOR WOMEN POLICY STUDIES; THE PROGRAM ON GENDER, SCIENCE AND LAW; STANLEY ARONOWITZ, Pt.D; PATRICIA CAMPBELL, PH.D.; BLYTHE MCVICKER CLINCHY, PH.D; MARY CRAWFORD, PH.D; FAYE J. CROSBY, PH.D; CYNTHIA FUCHS EPSTEIN, PH.D.; MICHELLE FINE, PH.D.; CAROL GILLIGAN, PH.D.; MARY S. HENIFIN, M.P.H., J.D.; RUTH HUBBARD PH.D.; VILMA HUNT, B.D.S., M.A.; ANNE S. KASPER, PH.D.; PENELOPE KEGEL-FLOM, PH.D.; EVELYN FOX KELLER, PH.D.; VALERIE E. LEE, ED.D.; ZELLA LUIA, PH.D.; MAUREEN PAUL, M.D., M.P.H.; DIANE S. POLLARD, PH.D.; SUSAN REVERBY, PH.D.; JO SANDERS; BERNICE SANDLER, ED.D.; ELLEN WAHL; LESLIE WOLFE, PH.D. JOAN E. BERTIN (Counsel ofRecord) Program on Gender, Science and Law Columbia University School of Public Health 60 Haven Avenue, B2-219 New York, New York 10032 237 238 N.Y.L. SCH. J. HUM. RTS. [Vol. XIV Due to the publishing format of the New York Law School Journalof Human Rights, the original page numbering in the Table of Contents has been altered to accommodate printing. 19981 United States. v. Virginia 239 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Authorities ..................................... (ii) Interest of Amici Curiae .................................. 1 Summary of Argument ................................... I ARGUM EN T .......................................... 2 I. VMI'S SEX-BASED ADMISSION POLICY VIOLATES EQUAL PROTECTION ........... 3 A. VMI's Policy of Exclusion Is Based on Impermissible Generalizations and Stereotypes .......................... 4 B. The Generalizations Offered By VMI Are Inaccurate and Misleading ............. 10 C. There Is No Constitutionally Sufficient Rationale To Justify a Continuing Exclusion of Women .................. 15 II. THE LOWER COURTS RELIED ON PALPABLY INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO JUSTIFY CONTINUING SEX DISCRIMINATION ....... 21 CON CLUSION ......................................... 30 240 N.Y.L. SCH. J. HUM. RTS. [Vol. XIV TABLE OF AUTHORITIES FEDERAL CASES Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976) ........................ 4 ,16 .......................... Daubertv. MerrellDow Pharmaceuticals,113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993) ........................ ..... ........ ............. 2 ,2 2 Dothardv. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977) ............. .. .... .............. 16,20 InternationalUnion, UA Wv. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991) .... ........................... 18 JE.B. v. Alabama ex rel. TB., 114 S. Ct. 1419 (1994) ........... ....................... passim Mississippi Univ. for Women v. Hogar 458 U.S. 718 (1982)1 ........... ........................ 2,4,17 Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908) ........................ ... .: . 3 Orrv. Orr, 440 U.S. 268 (1979) ..... 4 ,16 PersonnelAdm'r v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979) ............. ...........................18 Reedv. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971) .... .. 4 ,16 Roberts v. UnitedStates Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609 (1984) ........... .. 3 Schlesinger v. Ballard,419 U.S. 498 (1975) ........................ ........ ........... ..........19 United States v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 55 F.3d 90 (4th Cir. 1995) ......................... ......................... ...16 United States v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 44 F.3d 1229 (4th Cir. 1995) ................. .. ... 5 ,18 1998] United States. v. Virginia 241 United States v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 766 F. Supp. 1407 (W .D .V a. 1991) ........................................ passim United States v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 852 F. Supp. 471 (W .D .V a. 1994) ........................................... 5,24 United States v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 976 F.2d 891 (4th Cir. 1992) ........................ 5,20 Wengler v. DruggistsMut. Ins. Co., 446 U .S. 142 (1980) ........................................ 18 TRANSCRIPTS OF PROCEEDINGS United States v. Commonwealth of Virginia (W.D. Va.) (90-01260-R) ......................... passim CONSTITUTION, STATUTES AND RULES US. Const.: Equal Protection ............................. passim Clause Fed. R.. Evid. 702-703, 28 U .S.C .A .................................................. 2,22 BOOKS & ARTICLES Astin, Alexander, Four CriticalYears: Effects of College on Beliefs, Attitudes, and Knowledge (1977) ............................... 29 Babbie, Earl, The Practiceof Social Science Research (4th Ed. 1986) .............................. 23 Baer, Judith, The Chains of Protection (19 7 8) .. .. ... .... .................. ... ..... ...... ......... 3 242 N.Y.L. SCH. J. HUM. RTS. [Vol. XIV Boutilier M., & L. SanGiovanni, Women and Sports: Reflections on Health andPolicy, in Women, Health, and Healing: Toward a New Perspective (Lewin & Olsesen eds., 1985) ................................. 15 Bryk, Anthony, Valerie Lee & P.B. Holland, Catholic Schools and the Common Good (1993) ................................... 26 Deaux, Kay and Mary Kite, Thinking About Gender,in Analyzing Gender: A Handbook of Social Science Research (Hess & Ferree eds., 1987) ........................... 13 Deaux, Kay and Mary Kite, Gender Stereotypes in Psychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues & Theories (Denmark & Paludi eds., 1993) ........................................... 11,12,13 Eagley, Alice, The Science and Politicsof Comparing Women and Men, 50 Am. Psych. 145 (1995) ............................... 11 Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs, Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender, and the Social Order (1988) ........................................ 12 Fahey, T.D., Endurance Training, in Women and Exercise: Physiology and Sports Medicine, 2nd Ed. 80 (Shangold & M irkin eds., 1994) ............................... 14 Fox-Genovese, Elizabeth, Feminism Without Illusions:A Critique of Individualism (1991) ........................................ 11 Genel, Myron, Gender Differences in Growth andMaturation: Are These Relevant for Athletic Competition? 4 J.W omen's Health 425 (1995) ............................... 14 19981 United States. v. Virginia 243 Gilligan, Carol, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (1982) ..................................... 25,26 Gould, Stephen J., The Mismeasure of Man (1981) ....... ................................... 3 Guinier, Lani, Michelle Fine and Jane Balin, Becoming Gentlemen: Women's Experiences at One Ivy League Law School, 143 U. Pa. L . R ev. 1 (1994) ........................................... 27 Hale, R.W., Differences and SimilaritiesBetween the Sexes, in Caringfor the Exercising Woman (Hale ed., 1991) ..................................... 14 Hyde, J.S., & M.C. Linn, The Psychology of Gender (1986) ........................................... 13 Jimenez, Emanuel & Marlaine Lockheed, Enhancing Girls Education Through Single-Sex Education: Evidence and a Policy Conundrum, 11 Educ. Eval. and Policy Anal. 117 (1989) .................................. 27 Kessler-Harris, Alice Out to Work (1982) .......................................... 3 Lee, Valerie, Single-Sex Schooling: What Is the Issue?, in US. Dept. ofEduc. Single-Sex Schooling: Proponents Speak (1993) ................................. 28,29 Lee, Valerie & Helen Marks, Sustained Effects of the Single-Sex Secondary School Experience on Attitudes, Behaviors, and Values in College, 82 J. Educ. Psych. 578 (1990) ................................. 26 244 N.Y.L. SCH. J. HUM. RTS. [Vol. XIV Lee, Valerie, et al., Sexism in Single-Sex and Coeducational Independent Secondary School Classroom, 67 Sociol. of Educ. 97 (1994) ................................ ............... 26,27 Lee & Bryk, Effects of Single-Sex Secondary Schools on Student Achievement andAttitudes, 78 J. Educ. Psych. 381 (1986) ................... ....... ........... 2 6 Lowe, Marian, Social Bodies: The Interaction of Culture and Women's Biology, in Biological Woman: The ConvenientMyth (Hubbard, et ...i. .. .............3 al., eds., 1982) ............................ Marsh, Herbert, Public, Catholic Single-Sex, and Catholic CoeducationalHigh Schools: Their Effects on Achievement, Affect, and Behaviors, 81 J. Educ. Psych. 320 (1989) ............................... ....... ........ .. 2 8 McArdle, W.D., Essentials of Exercise Physiology (1994) ......................... ................. 14 National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Women's Work, Men's Work: Occupational Segregation on the Job (Reskin & Hartmann eds., 1986) ...................... ............... 2 0 Offer, Daniel, The Psychological World of the Teenager: A Study of175 B oys (1969) .............................. ................. 25 19981 United States. v. Virginia 245 Parlee, Mary Brown, Women, Peace and The Reproduction of Gender,in On Peace, War

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    53 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us