Bus Rapid Transit Project Section 106 Assessment of Effects and Final Determination of Effect for Historic Properties November 2020 Prepared by: Minnesota Department of Transportation Cultural Resources Unit 395 John Ireland Boulevard Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 http://www.dot.state.mn.us/culturalresources/index.html http://www.dot.state.mn.us/culturalresources/contacts.html On behalf of: United States Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Region V 200 West Adams Street, Suite 320 Chicago, Illinois 60606 To request this document in an alternative format: Please call 651-366-4718 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota). You may also send an email to [email protected]. Summary The METRO Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project (Project) is a proposed ten-mile-long BRT line located in Ramsey and Washington counties, Minnesota. Operating in both mixed traffic and on a dedicated guideway, the proposed alignment will generally parallel Interstate (I-) 94 from downtown Saint Paul to just east of I-694, where it will turn south and extend along Helmo and Bielenberg Avenues to the Woodbury Village Shopping Center, connecting downtown Saint Paul with the suburban cities of Maplewood, Landfall, Oakdale and Woodbury. The proposed line includes 21 stations, four (4) of which will include a park-and-ride facility. The Metropolitan Council (MC) intends to apply to the Federal Transit Authority (FTA) to fund the Project, request an Interstate right-of-way use agreement for a portion of the Project’s preferred alternative from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), acting through the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), and seek permits for construction from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Therefore, the Project is a federal undertaking and must comply with Section 306108 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA), as amended (54 United States Code [USC] § 306108; hereinafter referred to as Section 106) and its implementing regulations, 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 800 et. seq.; Section 101(b)(4) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, (42 USC § 4331); and other applicable federal mandates. The Project will also seek funding and use of public lands from the State of Minnesota and political subdivisions of the State, and permits for construction from several state agencies. Therefore, it must also comply with Minnesota laws, including the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act of 1973, the Minnesota Field Archaeology Act (Minnesota Statute [MS] § 138.31–138.42), the Minnesota Historic Sites Act (MS § 138.661– 138.669), and the Minnesota Private Cemeteries Act (MS 307.08), as applicable. This assessment of effects study was prepared to comply with these legislative requirements. This report describes the proposed Project; its Area of Potential Effects (APE); efforts to identify and evaluate historic properties within the Project’s APE to determine their eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places; and evaluates the Project’s effects on those properties. Based on findings of the effects assessments, the Project will have No Effect on 17 historic properties; No Adverse Effect on 5 historic properties; and No Adverse Effect on 12 historic properties with the implementation of conditions. One additional property has been identified as requiring additional research and possible assessment of effect; this property will be addressed in a supplemental report. FTA has determined therefore that the undertaking will have No Adverse Effect on historic properties. MERTO Gold Line BRT Project i Section 106 Assessment of Effects and Final Determination of Effect for Historic Properties This page intentionally left blank. MERTO Gold Line BRT Project ii Section 106 Assessment of Effects and Final Determination of Effect for Historic Properties Table of Contents Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................. iv List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................................. vi Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................... vii Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 2: Project Description .................................................................................................................................... 4 Geographic Area and Bus Rapid Transit Alignment ................................................................................................... 4 Guideway .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Stations and Park-and-Ride Lots ................................................................................................................................. 5 Operations and Maintenance Facility (OMF) ............................................................................................................. 7 Bridges ........................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Roadway Improvements............................................................................................................................................. 8 Noise Barriers ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 Retaining Walls and Stormwater Retention Facilities .............................................................................................. 10 Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements ..................................................................................................................... 11 BRT Vehicles ............................................................................................................................................................. 11 Transit Operations .................................................................................................................................................... 12 Section 3: Section 106 Legal and Regulatory Context .............................................................................................. 15 Section 4: Identification of Historic Properties ........................................................................................................ 16 Area of Potential Effects ........................................................................................................................................... 16 Identification and Evaluation of Historic Properties ................................................................................................ 21 Section 5: Section 106 Consultation ......................................................................................................................... 30 Agency Coordination and Public Involvement ......................................................................................................... 30 MERTO Gold Line BRT Project iii Section 106 Assessment of Effects and Final Determination of Effect for Historic Properties Tribal Consultation ................................................................................................................................................... 31 Section 6: Assessment of Effects .............................................................................................................................. 33 Assessing Effects on Historic Properties ................................................................................................................... 33 Effects Assessment and Effects Findings .................................................................................................................. 34 Individual Historic Property Assessments ................................................................................................................ 39 Project Determination of Effect ............................................................................................................................. 131 References ............................................................................................................................................................. 135 List of Figures Figure 1. Project Location ...........................................................................................................................................2 Figure 2. Typical BRT Bus ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 3. Architecture/History APE: Woodbury to Van Dyke Street in Saint Paul .................................................. 17 Figure 4. Architecture/History APE: Van Dyke Street to Downtown Saint Paul .....................................................