Seismic Activity and Neotectonic Evolution of the Western Carpathians (Slovakia)

Seismic Activity and Neotectonic Evolution of the Western Carpathians (Slovakia)

EGU Stephan Mueller Special Publication Series, 3, 167–184, 2002 c European Geosciences Union 2002 Seismic activity and neotectonic evolution of the Western Carpathians (Slovakia) M. Kova´cˇ1, M. Bielik2, J. Hok´ 3, P. Kova´cˇ3, B. Kronome1, P. Labak´ 2, P. Moczo2, D. Plasienkaˇ 4, J. Sefaraˇ 5, and M. Sujanˇ 6 1Department of Geology and Paleontology, Comenius University, Mlynska´ dolina G, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia 2Geophysical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravsk´ a´ cesta 9, 842 28 Bratislava, Slovakia 3Geological Survey of Slovak Republic, Mlynska´ dolina 1, 817 04 Bratislava, Slovakia 4Geological Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravsk´ a´ cesta 9, 842 28 Bratislava, Slovakia 5Department of Geophysics, Comenius University, Mlynska´ dolina G, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia 6EQUIS Ltd., Racianskaˇ 57, 831 02 Bratislava, Slovakia Received: 2 May 2000 – Accepted: 8 March 2001 Abstract. Seismic activity in the Western Carpathians is ing the Miocene as low-angle extensional faults. The seismic closely related to the crustal rheology and combined struc- events (e.g. Komarno´ area) are most probably generated on tural pattern within the brittle upper crust. The structural these low-angle surfaces. pattern is a combination of three structural levels. The deep- est level is represented by the Paleo-Alpine suture zones Key words. Western Carpathians, rheology, structural pat- dissected by neo-Alpine fault structures, above all strike- terns, recent stress field, seismic activity, seismic hazard slip fault zones (second level). The recent tectonic regimes are controlled by the contemporary stress field and vertical movements (third level). Following the analyses of structures and various geophysical data, the principal seismo-tectonic 1 Introduction zones of the Western Carpathians are defined. The most remarkable and important first-order tectonic Seismicity, as one of the important environmental hazards, is structure in the Western Carpathians is the zone of the closely related to the stress release in the crust, often bound Pieniny Klippen Belt, which represents the contact of the to the brittle fault deformation. Therefore prevention of pos- Western Carpathian internides and the stable European Plat- sible catastrophic consequences of earthquakes needs a good form. seismotectonic model of the investigated area based on, in The Mur-Murz-Leitha¨ fault zone in the area of the Vienna addition to seismological studies, a complex research of fault Basin represents the contact of the Eastern Alps with the structures by all available means of geological and geophys- block of Western Carpathian internides. Both these tectonic ical methods. lines represent subvertical boundaries with Tertiary tectonic Seismic activity of Slovakia is closely related to crustal activity. rheology and structural pattern. In most cases the seismic The Certovicaˇ fault zone is a surface projection of the events are immediately related with the movements on fault thrust plane of the Veporic thick-skinned sheet over the Tatric surfaces. Therefore it is possible to correlate more or less unit. Based on geological and geophysical data it is as- successfully the earthquake hypocenters with the fault struc- sumed that the Certovicaˇ zone is recently active due to its tures, which are in an appropriate anglular relationship with extensional reactivation. Earthquake events are released here major elements of the stress field. mostly along the Hron fault system of the ENE-WSW direc- tion. The present paper gives an overview of the research in The next important tectonic structure is the Hurbanovo- seismic hazard assessment, in order to document the present Diosjen´ o˝ line, which is most probably the continuation of the stage of knowledge about the neotectonics of the Slovakian Raba´ line into the Slovak territory. Based on reflection seis- territory. Based on the geological structure, tectonic de- mic interpretations, there are several low-angle fault surfaces formation, localised earthquake epicenters and geophysical dipping to the SE. These thrust planes were reactivated dur- characteristics we have tried to identify the geological struc- tures, which in our opinion could potentially generate the Correspondence to: M. Kova´cˇ ([email protected]) seismic events. 168 M. Kova´cˇ et al.: Seismic activity and neotectonic evolution of the Western Carpathians (Slovakia) Fig. 1. Map of epicentres of macroseismically observed earthquakes for the period 1034–1990 (Labak´ and Broucek,ˇ 1996) 2 Seismic activity tral Slovakia, Komarno´ and Slanske´ vrchy Mts. Dobra´ Voda is the best spatially defined focal zone. This is thanks to the Territory of the Western Carpathians and the whole Slovakia consistent clustering of the macroseismically and instrumen- can be characterised by a moderate earthquake activity. This tally localized earthquake epicenters. is documented by descriptive (Rethly,´ 1952; Karn´ ´ık et al., Epicentral intensities of the three largest documented 1957) and parametric catalogues (Zs´ıros et al., 1988 and earthquakes, the June 5, 1443 Central Slovakia earthquake, Labak´ and Broucek,ˇ 1996) as well as several case studies 28 June 1763 Komarno´ earthquake and 9 January 1906 (e.g. Szeidovitz, 1986; Broucekˇ et al., 1991; Labak´ et al., Dobra´ Voda earthquake, all with epicentral intensity of I0 = 1996). More than 590 macroseismically felt earthquakes 8–9◦ MSK, allow for the lower bound estimate of the maxi- with epicentres on the territory of Slovakia since 1034 are mum magnitude of MS = 5.7. The recent estimate of the max- documented in the Labak´ and Broucek’sˇ (1996) catalogue. imum magnitude in the Western Carpathians of Ms = 6.2–6.8 Given the fact that more than 550 of them occurred after was determined by Labak´ et al. (1997) who performed the the 28 June 1763 Komarno´ earthquake, it is clear that the integrated seismic hazard analysis for the Bohunice nuclear real number of the macroseismically felt earthquakes during power plant site. the documented period should be considerably larger than 590. In addition to the macroseismic catalogues, the seismic activity is documented by seismometrically localised earth- 3 Depth of the earthquake foci and rheology quakes. 35 earthquakes with local magnitude larger than ap- proximately 2.5 have been localised for the whole territory Earthquake hypocenters deeper than 20–30 km are known of Slovakia since 1956. Data on microseismic activity is, in only from the marginal parts of the Carpathians and/or from fact, restricted to the Dobra´ Voda focal zone. Since 1987, the southeastern margin of the Pannonian Basin. The only more than 60 earthquakes with local magnitude greater than active Benioff zone in the Carpathian arc related to the sub- or equal to 1 have been recorded and localised by a local net- duction process is situated in the Vrancea area, at a junc- work there. tion of the Eastern and Southern Carpathians in Roma- Data indicate the existence of several earthquake focal nia. Hypocenters are in depths 10–180 km there, with an zones (Fig. 1) – Male´ Karpaty Mts., Dobra´ Voda, Zilina,ˇ Cen- enigmatic seismic gap, which can be observed between 40 M. Kova´cˇ et al.: Seismic activity and neotectonic evolution of the Western Carpathians (Slovakia) 169 Fig. 2. Yield-strength contour plot for compressional deformation for NW-SE cross-section of Central Europe from the Bohemian Massif via the Western Carpathians to the Pannonian basin, at a strain-rate of ε = 10−15 s−1 (modified after Lankreijer et al., 1999). A clear rheological stratification of the lithosphere is visible. The Moldanubicum core of the Bohemian massif indicates a strong keel. The strength rapidly decreases away from the strong center towards SE and NW. The Carpathian foreland is relatively strong, too. The Vienna basin shows a remarkably strong lithosphere owing to the fact we did not correct for the insulation effect of thermal blanketing of the over 6 km fill of the basin. The Pannonian basin typically only displays lithospheric strength in the uppermost parts of the crust. and 60 km (Onescu, 1984). The other earthquakes in the shallow crustal earthquakes. Carpathian-Pannonian region are shallow and their origin is related probably to processes different from subduction. Based on extrapolation of failure criteria, lithology and temperature models, Lankreijer et al. (1999) predicted rheol- For about 10% of the total number of the macroseismi- ogy of the lithosphere for two sections through the Western cally located earthquakes in Slovakia, macroseismic focal Carpathians and surrounding regions. Yield-strength con- depths were determined. They range from several kilometres tour plot for compressional deformation for NW-SE cross- down to approximately 15–18 km. The focal depth interval is section of Central Europe from the Bohemian Massif via confirmed by seismometric hypocenter locations. The recent the Western Carpathians to the Pannonian basin is shown in study of the 5 June 1443 Central Slovakia earthquake (Labak´ Fig. 2. The lithological model was defined by means of grav- et al., 1996) shows that the previously reported focal depth ity and geothermal interpretations, together with deep seis- of about 25 km is doubtful and available data do not allow mic profiling on the structure and composition of the crust reliable focal depth determination. The Western Carpathians and subcrustal lithosphere. They adopted a five-layer litho- and surrounding region can be, therefore, characterised by logical model for the calculation of yield strength

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    18 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us