Results of Project Phase 1

Results of Project Phase 1

EUROPEAN MARKET OBSERVATORY FOR FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE PRODUCTS RESULTS OF PROJECT PHASE 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – APRIL 2011 This study was conducted by: In partnership with: This study is financed by the European Commission, DG-MARE. The views and conclusions presented in this executive summary reflect the opinion of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Commission or of its officers. i CONTENTS 1 Overarching objective and work plan .............................................................................................. 1 2 Specific objectives of the EUMOFA .................................................................................................. 1 3 Methodology adopted for the “state of play” analysis ..................................................................... 2 4 Survey results and data feeding proposals by stage of the supply chain ............................................ 3 4.0 Overall findings which could limit future data gathering ........................................................................... 5 4.1 First sale stage ........................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1.1 Results of the survey and most relevant sources identified .................................................................... 6 4.1.2 Data feeding structural options, by project objective .............................................................................. 8 4.2 Wholesale stage ........................................................................................................................................16 4.2.1 Results of the survey and most relevant sources identified .................................................................. 16 4.2.2 Data feeding structural options, common proposals for the 3 Project Objectives ................................ 16 4.3 Import/Export stage .................................................................................................................................20 4.3.1 Results of the survey and most relevant sources identified .................................................................. 20 4.3.2 Data feeding structural options, by project objective ............................................................................ 21 4.4 Processing stage .......................................................................................................................................23 4.4.1 Results of the survey and most relevant sources identified .................................................................. 23 4.4.2 Data feeding structural options, by project objective ............................................................................ 24 4.5 Consumption stage ...................................................................................................................................28 4.5.1 Results of the survey and most relevant sources identified .................................................................. 30 4.5.2 Data feeding structural options, by project objective ............................................................................ 31 4.6 Structural options for achieving the project’s Objective 4 .........................................................................37 4.7 Proposal for the setting up of a “European Antennas System for Fishery” ................................................39 ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1 - Existence of weekly prices from sales notes/auctions by MS and source ........................................................... 9 Table 2 - Pros/cons analysis of option FS 1.1-fishery.......................................................................................................... 9 Table 3 – Existing aquaculture monitoring initiatives by MS and species ........................................................................ 10 Table 4 - Pros/cons analysis of option FS 1.2-Aquaculture ............................................................................................... 11 Table 5 - Existence of monthly prices and volumes from sales notes/auctions by MS and source .................................. 12 Table 6 - Pros/cons analysis of option FS 2.1-Fishery ....................................................................................................... 13 Table 7 – Sources proposed for preliminary figures, by MS ............................................................................................. 14 Table 8 - Pros/cons analysis of option FS 3.1-Fishery ....................................................................................................... 15 Table 9 - Pros/cons analysis of option FS 3.2-Aquaculture ............................................................................................... 15 Table 10 - Proposed sources for the first group of MS (FR, IT and ES)* ........................................................................... 17 Table 11 - Pros/cons analysis of the options for the wholesale stage, for the MS of group 1 ......................................... 18 Table 12 – Proposed sources for the second group of MS ............................................................................................... 19 Table 13 - Pros/cons analysis of options for the wholesale stage, for the MS of Group 2 ............................................... 19 Table 14 - Pros/cons analysis of option IE – 1A ................................................................................................................ 22 Table 15 - Pros/cons analysis of option IE – 2A and option IE - 3A ................................................................................... 22 Table 16 – Sources for Production and Sales data on a yearly basis ................................................................................ 25 Table 17 - Pros/cons analysis of option P 3-A ................................................................................................................... 25 Table 18 - Sources for economic and financial data on a yearly basis, by MS .................................................................. 26 Table 19 - Pros/cons analysis of option P 3-B ................................................................................................................... 27 Table 20 – Sources for retail prices by MS ........................................................................................................................ 32 Table 21 - Pros/cons analysis of option C 1-A ................................................................................................................... 32 Table 22 - Pros/cons analysis of options C 2-A and C2-B .................................................................................................. 34 Table 23 - Pros/cons analysis of option C 2-C ................................................................................................................... 34 Table 24 - Pros/cons analysis of option C 3-A and C3-B ................................................................................................... 36 Table 25 - Pros/cons analysis of option C 3-C ................................................................................................................... 36 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 - Food Balance of fish and fishery products (% in volume) ................................................................................... 4 Figure 2 - Catches and aquaculture production broken down by fishing area (% in volume - 2007) ................................. 4 Figure 3 - Comparison of “intra EU” vs “extra EU” Imports .............................................................................................. 20 Figure 4 – Processed fish production by status (% on total volumes of final products - 2007) ........................................ 23 Figure 5 – Group Analysis approach ................................................................................................................................. 26 Figure 6 - Consumption of F&A products by status (% in volume – only MS where data are available) .......................... 28 Figure 7 - Domestic versus HORECA consumption (F&A products; % in volume ; only MS where data are available) .... 29 Figure 8 - Distribution channels referring to F&A products (% on sales – only MS where data are available) ................ 30 iii List of sources acronyms Association Des Entreprises de Produits Alimentaires Elaborés - Association of Food Processing ADEPALE Companies - France Associazione Nazionale Conservieri Ittici e delle Tonnare - National Association of Seafood processing ANCIT Companies - Italy ANFACO Canning industry organization - Spain BLE Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung - Germany CMR Centrum Monitorowania Rybolówstwa - Fisheries Monitoring Centre in Gdynia - Poland CBS Central Statistic Bureau - Latvia DFD Danish Fishery Directorate - Denmark DFMR Department of Fisheries and Marine Research Ministry of Agriculture - Cyprus DGPA Direcção-Geral das Pescas e Aquicultura - Portugal Docapesca Auction markets manager - Portugal DPMA Direction des pêches maritimes et de l´aquaculture du Ministiere de l´agriculture et de la pêche - France FDVO The Fisheries Department of the Vlaamse Overheid - Belgium FGFRI Finnish Game and Fisheries Research institute - Finland FIDIR Directorate of Fisheries - Norway Fiskistofa Directorate of Fisheries - Iceland GUS Central Statistical

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    44 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us