Compensation in Preclinical Huntington's Disease: Evidence from the Track-On HD Study

Compensation in Preclinical Huntington's Disease: Evidence from the Track-On HD Study

EBioMedicine 2 (2015) 1420–1429 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect EBioMedicine journal homepage: www.ebiomedicine.com Research Article Compensation in Preclinical Huntington's Disease: Evidence From the Track-On HD Study Stefan Klöppel a,b,c,1,SarahGregoryd,1, Elisa Scheller a,b,e,LoraMinkovaa,b,e, Adeel Razi d,f, Alexandra Durr g,h, Raymund A.C. Roos i, Blair R. Leavitt j, Marina Papoutsi k,G.BernhardLandwehrmeyerl, Ralf Reilmann m,n, Beth Borowsky o, Hans Johnson p, James A. Mills q, Gail Owen k, Julie Stout r, Rachael I. Scahill k, Jeffrey D. Long q,s, Geraint Rees d,t,⁎,1, Sarah J. Tabrizi k,⁎⁎,1, the Track-On investigators a Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, University Medical Center, Division Freiburg Brain Imaging, Freiburg, Germany b Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Freiburg, Germany c Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Freiburg, Germany d Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK e Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Department of Psychology, Laboratory for Biological and Personality Psychology, Freiburg, Germany f Department of Electronic Engineering, N.E.D University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi, Pakistan g APHP Department of Genetics, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, UPMC Université Paris VI UMR_S1127, Paris France h Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle, INSERM U1127, CNRS UMR7225, UPMC Université Paris VI UMR_S1127, Paris France i Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Leiden, The Netherlands j Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Canada k Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK l Department of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany m George-Huntington-Institute, Muenster, Germany n University of Tuebingen, Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tuebingen, Germany o CHDI Management/CHDI Foundation, Princeton, NJ, USA p Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA q Department of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA r School of Psychological Sciences and Institute of Clinical and Cognitive Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia s Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA t Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK article info abstract Article history: Background: Cognitive and motor task performance in premanifest Huntington's disease (HD) gene-carriers is Received 8 July 2015 often within normal ranges prior to clinical diagnosis, despite loss of brain volume in regions involved in these Received in revised form 31 July 2015 tasks. This indicates ongoing compensation, with the brain maintaining function in the presence of neuronal Accepted 2 August 2015 loss. However, thus far, compensatory processes in HD have not been modeled explicitly. Using a new model, Available online 4 August 2015 which incorporates individual variability related to structural change and behavior, we sought to identify func- tional correlates of compensation in premanifest-HD gene-carriers. Keywords: Methods: We investigated the modulatory effects of regional brain atrophy, indexed by structural measures of Huntington's disease Preclinical disease load, on the relationship between performance and brain activity (or connectivity) using task-based Neural compensation and resting-state functional MRI. MRI Findings: Consistent with compensation, as atrophy increased performance-related activity increased in the right Cognitive parietal cortex during a working memory task. Similarly, increased functional coupling between the right dorso- Motor lateral prefrontal cortex and a left hemisphere network in the resting-state predicted better cognitive perfor- mance as atrophy increased. Such patterns were not detectable for the left hemisphere or for motor tasks. Interpretation: Our findings provide evidence for active compensatory processes in premanifest-HD for cognitive demands and suggest a higher vulnerability of the left hemisphere to the effects of regional atrophy. © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). ⁎ Correspondence to: G. Rees, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK. ⁎⁎ Correspondence to: S. Tabrizi, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (G. Rees), [email protected] (S.J. Tabrizi). 1 Equal first and senior authors. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.08.002 2352-3964/© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). S. Klöppel et al. / EBioMedicine 2 (2015) 1420–1429 1421 1. Introduction activity to maintain similar levels of performance in individuals with higher structural disease load. In neurodegenerative disease, progressive degenerative changes can We characterized structural disease load using volumetric measures be detected many years prior to the manifestation of clinical symptoms of the caudate, putamen, global gray and global white matter that show including cognitive and motor deficits. Such findings indicate that the sensitivity towards HD-related changes (Tabrizi et al., 2012). These brain has capacity to compensate for degenerative losses, maintaining structural markers of disease load were included in a systematic exam- normal levels of cognitive and motor function, until such time that ination of both brain activity and connectivity. Brain activity was mea- neuropathology translates into clinical loss of function. For example, in sured during performance of a motor or cognitive task using task-fMRI Huntington's disease (HD), a fully penetrant monogenic disorder, indi- and brain connectivity within cognitive and motor networks using viduals far from the onset of overt signs and symptoms demonstrate resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI). This allowed us to perform a comprehen- extensive neuroimaging evidence of subcortical and cortical atrophy. sive, unbiased whole-brain assessment of potential markers of compen- However, such HD expansion mutation carriers perform similarly sation for neurodegeneration in preHD. to healthy controls on a wide variety of motor and cognitive tests and show minimal longitudinal change in performance (Tabrizi et al., 2. Materials and Methods 2011; Papoutsi et al., 2014). We can postulate two different mechanisms that might be responsi- 2.1. Participants ble for this dissociation between progressive structural pathology and minimal measurable phenotypical behavioral change. Inherent cog- 239 participants were recruited from the four Track-On HD study nitive reserve may mitigate against the emergence of measurable sites and comprised the following three groups: (1) 106 individuals phenotypical alterations before a threshold for functional degradation without HD but carrying the mutant huntingtin gene (F 54; mean is exceeded. Alternatively, secondary compensatory mechanisms, in age ± SD: 42 · 80 ± 9 · 10), (2) 22 early HD patients (F 15, mean which brain pathology leads to adaptation of neural activity patterns, age ± SD: 45 · 22 ± 7 · 89), and (3) 111 age- and sex-matched controls may emerge in the course of the disease process and could create alter- (F 67, mean age ± SD: 48 · 14 ± 10 · 70). The 22 early HD patients were native or modified neural processes to support maintenance of cogni- removed from all analyses as very few participated in all assessments. tive and motor function at normal levels. However, no universally 14 participants were left-handed and were excluded from the motor accepted definition of compensation exists (Barulli and Stern, 2013), fMRI task and resting state analyses (Oldfield, 1971). Most preHD and and the underlying mechanisms are unknown. control participants were recruited from the Track-HD study (Tabrizi Our previous longitudinal multi-site study (Track-HD) showed et al., 2009). Newly-recruited preHD participants were required to disease-related reductions in striatal and white matter volume (Tabrizi have a CAG repeat length ≥40 and a disease burden score greater than et al., 2009),andelevatedratesofatrophyfromtheveryearliest 250 at recruitment (Penney et al., 1997). Newly recruited control partic- premanifest stages (Tabrizi et al., 2011, 2012, 2013). Despite this ipants were either the partner or spouse of a participant, not at risk consistent progressive structural loss, high levels of functional per- of HD, or HD normal-repeat-length sibling or control volunteers. For formance are maintained in this cohort and there is little evidence both groups, exclusion criteria included manifest disease, age below of cognitive or motor decline over time (Tabrizi et al., 2009, 2011, 18 or above 65 (unless previously in Track-HD study), major psychiatric, 2012, 2013). The current study (Track-On HD) was designed to ex- neurological or medical disorder or a history of severe head injury (see plore the hypothesis that compensatory brain networks exist to

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us